Skip to main content
Log in

MR findings for differentiating decidualized endometriomas from seromucinous borderline tumors of the ovary

  • Pelvis
  • Published:
Abdominal Radiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

Decidualized endometriomas (DEs) and seromucinous borderline tumors (SMBTs) exhibit similar MR findings including markedly hyperintense mural nodules within endometriotic cysts on T2-weighted images. The present study aimed to assess the efficacy of MR imaging for differentiating between DEs and SMBTs of the ovary.

Materials and methods

MR images of 8 DEs and 14 SMBTs were retrospectively assessed and compared according to pathologies.

Results

With regard to quantitative assessments of mural nodules, the number and signal intensity ratios (SIRs) on T1-weighted images were significantly greater in DEs than in SMBTs (11.0 ± 8.4 vs. 4.3 ± 4.1, p < 0.05 and 2.36 ± 0.56 vs. 1.49 ± 0.27, p < 0.01, respectively), whereas the height was significantly lower in DEs than in SMBTs (4.5 ± 1.4 mm vs. 21.9 ± 11.4 mm, p < 0.01). However, there were no significant differences between DEs and SMBTs in the SIRs on T2-weighted images, SIRs on diffusion-weighted images, and apparent diffusion coefficient values. With regard to qualitative assessments of mural nodules, the lobulated margin, pedunculated configuration, and T2 hypointense core were significantly more frequent in SMBTs than in DEs (71% vs. 0%, p < 0.01; 86% vs. 0%, p < 0.01; and 43% vs. 0%, p < 0.05, respectively).

Conclusion

The number, height, SIRs on T1-weighted images, lobulated margin, pedunculated configuration, and T2 hypointense core of mural nodules within endometriotic cysts were useful MR findings for differentiating DEs from SMBTs.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Schindler AE (2004) Pathophysiology, diagnosis and treatment of endometriosis. Minerva Ginecol 56:419-435.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Vigano P, Parazzini F, Somigliana E, et al. (2004) Endometriosis: epidemiology and aetiological factors. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol 18:177-200.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Takeuchi M, Matsuzaki K, Uehara H, et al. (2006) Malignant transformation of pelvic endometriosis: MR imaging findings and pathologic correlation. Radiographics 26:407-417.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Bourgioti C, Preza O, Panourgias E, et al. (2017) MR imaging of endometriosis: Spectrum of disease. Diagn Interv Imaging 98:751-767.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Rutgers JL, Scully RE (1988) Ovarian mullerian mucinous papillary cystadenomas of borderline malignancy. A clinicopathologic analysis. Cancer 61:340-348.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Kim KR, Choi J, Hwang JE, et al. (2010) Endocervical-like (Mullerian) mucinous borderline tumours of the ovary are frequently associated with the KRAS mutation. Histopathology 57:587-596.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Tanaka YO, Okada S, Yagi T, et al. (2010) MRI of endometriotic cysts in association with ovarian carcinoma. AJR Am J Roentgenol 194:355-361.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Siegelman ES, Oliver ER (2012) MR imaging of endometriosis: ten imaging pearls. Radiographics 32:1675-1691.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Takeuchi M, Matsuzaki K, Nishitani H (2008) Magnetic resonance manifestations of decidualized endometriomas during pregnancy. J Comput Assist Tomogr 32:353-355.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Morisawa N, Kido A, Kataoka M, et al. (2014) Magnetic resonance imaging manifestations of decidualized endometriotic cysts: comparative study with ovarian cancers associated with endometriotic cysts. J Comput Assist Tomogr 38:879-884.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Kataoka M, Togashi K, Koyama T, et al. (2002) MR imaging of mullerian mucinous borderline tumors arising from endometriotic cysts. J Comput Assist Tomogr 26:532-537.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Kurata Y, Kido A, Moribata Y, et al. (2017) Diagnostic performance of MR imaging findings and quantitative values in the differentiation of seromucinous borderline tumour from endometriosis-related malignant ovarian tumour. Eur Radiol 27:1695-1703.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Takeuchi M, Matsuzaki K, Harada M (2016) Computed diffusion-weighted imaging for differentiating decidualized endometrioma from ovarian cancer. Eur J Radiol 85:1016-1019.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Liu T, Sumida D, Wada T, et al. (2019) A diagnostic challenge of seromucinous borderline tumor: A case report. Medicine (Baltimore) 98:e15707.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Leiserowitz GS, Xing G, Cress R, et al. (2006) Adnexal masses in pregnancy: how often are they malignant? Gynecol Oncol 101:315-321.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Matsubayashi RN, Matsuo Y, Nakazono T, et al. (2015) Magnetic resonance imaging manifestations of ovarian mullerian mixed epithelial borderline tumors: imaging and histologic features in comparison with mullerian mucinous borderline tumors. J Comput Assist Tomogr 39:276-280.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Kurata Y, Kido A, Moribata Y, et al. (2018) Differentiation of Seromucinous Borderline Tumor from Serous Borderline Tumor on MR Imaging. Magn Reson Med Sci 17:211-217.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Fruscella E, Testa AC, Ferrandina G, et al. (2004) Sonographic features of decidualized ovarian endometriosis suspicious for malignancy. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 24:578-580.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Yoshida S, Onogi A, Shigetomi H, et al. (2008) Two cases of pregnant women with ovarian endometrioma mimicking a malignant ovarian tumor. J Clin Ultrasound 36:512-516.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Rodriguez IM, Irving JA, Prat J (2004) Endocervical-like mucinous borderline tumors of the ovary: a clinicopathologic analysis of 31 cases. Am J Surg Pathol 28:1311-1318.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Shimamoto A, Isomoto I, Segawa K, et al. (2014) The MRI findings in a case of ovarian mucinous borderline tumor mimicking a serous surface borderline tumor. Jpn J Radiol 32:552-555.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Tanase Y, Kawaguchi R, Takahama J, et al. (2018) Factors that Differentiate between Endometriosis-associated Ovarian Cancer and Benign Ovarian Endometriosis with Mural Nodules. Magn Reson Med Sci 17:231-237.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Expert Panel on MRS, Kanal E, Barkovich AJ, et al. (2013) ACR guidance document on MR safe practices: 2013. J Magn Reson Imaging 37:501-530.

Download references

Funding

No funding was received for this study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hiroki Kato.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.

Informed consent

Informed consent waiver was obtained by institutional review board for this study.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ando, T., Kato, H., Kawaguchi, M. et al. MR findings for differentiating decidualized endometriomas from seromucinous borderline tumors of the ovary. Abdom Radiol 45, 1783–1789 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-020-02412-x

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-020-02412-x

Keywords

Navigation