Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Esophageal cancer characterization with pneumo-64-MDCT

  • Published:
Abdominal Imaging Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Early diagnosis and accurate staging of esophageal cancer are both essential for therapeutic strategy planning. Endoscopic ultrasound, CT, and positron emission tomography have all been used in the preoperative staging of esophageal cancer separately or in various combinations. Each imaging method has its strengths and weaknesses. Depiction of the tumor’s anatomic location conditions the surgical strategy. Endoscopic ultrasound and PET have important advantages but neither provides information for surgical planning. CT scans have some limitations for hollow organ assessment in the absence of lumen distension, since the organ wall may be collapsed. Therefore, optimal esophageal distension could be very useful to overcome these limitations. This potential drawback is crucial at the level of the GE junction, a typically difficult region to evaluate. In order to optimize tumor visualization in the esophageal wall and in the GE junction, we developed a technique named pneumo-64-MDCT. We achieve maximum lumen distension, which better highlights the thickened areas in relation to the normal esophageal wall. At the present time, we have performed 200 studies with this technique and it proved useful, safe and accurate to identify esophageal wall thickening and to stage esophageal cancer. The additional stomach distension led to an adequate definition of both the upper and lower borders of the lesion in tumors located in the GE junction, which in turn was helpful to design the surgical approach.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Enzinger PC, Mayer RJ (2003) Esophageal cancer. N Engl J Med 349(23):2241–2252

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Jemal A, Siegel R, Ward E, Murray T (2007) Cancer statistics, 2007. CA Cancer J Clin 57:43–66

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Chow WH, Blot WJ, Vaughan TL, et al. (1998) Body mass index and risk of adenocarcinomas of the esophagus and gastric cardia. J Natl Cancer Inst 90(2):150–155

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Gebski V, Burmeister B, Smithers BM, et al. (2007) Survival benefits from neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy or chemotherapy in oesophageal carcinoma: a meta-analysis. Lancet Oncol 8(3):226–234

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Stahl M, Walz MK, Stuschke M, et al. (2009) Phase III comparison of preoperative chemotherapy compared with chemoradiotherapy in patients with locally advanced adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction. J Clin Oncol 27(6):851–856

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Berger AC, Farma J, Scott WJ, et al. (2005) Complete response to neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy in esophageal carcinoma is associated with significantly improved survival. J Clin Oncol 23:4330–4337

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Chandawarkar RY, Kakegawa T, Fujita H (1996) Comparative analysis of imaging modalities in the preoperative assessment of nodal metastases in esophageal cancer. J Surg Oncol 61:214–217

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Pfau PR, Perlman SB, Stanko P, et al. (2007) The role and clinical value of EUS in a multimodality esophageal carcinoma staging program with CT and positron emission tomography. Gastrointest Endosc 65:377–384

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Kumbasar B (2002) Carcinoma of esophagus: radiologic diagnosis and staging. Eur J Radiol 42:170–180

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Onbas O, Eroglu A, Kantarci M, et al. (2006) Preoperative staging of esophageal carcinoma with multidetector CT and virtual endoscopy. Eur J Radiol 57:90–95

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Abdalla EK, Pisters PW (2004) Staging and preoperative evaluation of upper gastrointestinal malignancies. Semin Oncol 31:513–529

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Rogers LF (1999) Bye-bye barium? Am J Roentgenol AJR 172(5):1179

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Ginsberg G, Fleisher D (2002) Esophageal tumors. In: Feldman M, Friedman L, Sleisenger M (eds) Sleisenger and Fordtran’s gastrointestinal and liver disease: pathophysiology, diagnosis, and management. Philadelphia: WB Saunders, pp 647–674

    Google Scholar 

  14. Romagnuolo J, Scott J, Hawes RH, et al. (2002) Helical CT versus EUS with fine needle aspiration for celiac nodal assessment in patients with esophageal cancer. Gastrointest Endosc 55:648–654

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Mallery S, Van Dam J (2000) EUS in the evaluation of esophageal carcinoma. Gastrointest Endosc 52:S6–S11

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Rösch T (1995) Endosonographic staging of esophageal cancer: a review of literature results. Gastrointest Endosc Clin North Am 5:537–547

    Google Scholar 

  17. Rasanen JV, Sihvo EI, Knuuti MJ, et al. (2003) Prospective analysis of accuracy of positron emission tomography, computed tomography, and endoscopic ultrasonography in staging of adenocarcinoma of the esophagus and the esophagogastric junction. Ann Surg Oncol 10:954–960

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Lerut T, Flamen P, Ectors N, et al. (2000) Histopathologic validation of lymph node staging with FDG-PET scan in cancer of the esophagus and gastroesophageal junction: a prospective study based on primary surgery with extensive lymphadenectomy. Ann Surg 232:743–751

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Kato H, Miyazaki T, Nakajima M, et al. (2005) The incremental effect of positron emission tomography on diagnostic accuracy in the initial staging of esophageal carcinoma. Cancer 103:148–156

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Liberale G, Van Laethem JL, Gay F, et al. (2004) The role of PET scan in the preoperative management of oesophageal cancer. Eur J Surg Oncol 30:942–947

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Sihvo EI, Rasanen JV, Knuuti MJ, et al. (2004) Adenocarcinoma of the esophagus and the esophagogastric junction: positron emission tomography improves staging and prediction of survival in distant but not locoregional disease. J Gastrointest Surg 8:988–996

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Mazzeo S, Caramella D, Gennai A, et al. (2004) Multidetector CT and virtual endoscopy in the evaluation of the esophagus. Abdom Imaging 29:2–8

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Kim AY, Kim HJ, Ha HK (2005) Gastric cancer by multidetector row CT: preoperative staging. Abdom Imaging 30(4):465–472

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Ulla M, Cavadas D, Muñoz I, et al. (2010) Esophageal cancer: pneumo-64-MDCT. Abdom Imaging 35(4):383–389

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Carrascosa P, Capuñay C, Lopez Martin, et al. (2008) Esophageal stenosis; three dimensional multidetector CT and virtual endoscopy. Abdom Imaging 34(1):19–25

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Thompson WM (1997) Esophageal carcinoma. Abdom Imaging 22:138–142

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Filippone A, Ambrosini R, Fuschi M, et al. (2004) Preoperative T and N staging of colorectal cancer: accuracy of contrast-enhanced multi-detector row CT colonography-initial experience. Radiology 231:83–90

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Brugel M, Link TM, Rummeny EJ, et al. (2004) Assessment of vascular invasion in pancreatic head cancer with multislice spiral CT: value of multiplanar reconstructions. Eur Radiol 14:1188–1195

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Itoh S, Ikeda M, Ota T, et al. (2003) Assessment of the pancreatic and intrapancreatic bile ducts using 0.5-mm collimation and multiplanar reformatted images in multislice CT. Eur Radiol 13:277–285

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Quarticelli T, Scardapane A, Memeo M, et al. (2004) Multidetector CT assessment of postgastrectomy patients. Radiol Med (Torino) 107:317–324

    Google Scholar 

  31. Ba-Ssalemah A, Zacherl J, Noebauer-Huhmann IM, et al. (2009) Dedicated multi-detector CT of the esophagus: spectrum of diseases. Abdom Imaging 34(1):3–18

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Kim YN, Choi D, Kim SH, et al. (2009) Gastric cancer staging at isotropic MDCT including coronal and sagittal MRP images: endoscopically diagnosed early vs. advanced gastric cancer. Abdom Imaging 34(1):26–34

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Tamm EP, Balachandran A, Bhosale P, et al. (2009) Update on 3D and multiplanar MDCT in the assessment of biliary and pancreatic pathology. Abdom Imaging 34(1):64–74

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Flamen P, Lerut T, Haustermans K, et al. (2004) Position of positron emission tomography and other imaging diagnostic modalities in esophageal cancer. Q J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 48:96–108

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Marina Ulla.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ulla, M., Gentile, E.M.J., Cavadas, D. et al. Esophageal cancer characterization with pneumo-64-MDCT. Abdom Imaging 37, 501–511 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-011-9784-z

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-011-9784-z

Keywords

Navigation