Skip to main content
Log in

Imaging sedation and anesthesia practice patterns in pediatric radiology departments — a survey of the Society of Chiefs of Radiology at Children’s Hospitals (SCORCH)

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Pediatric Radiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

There are few data describing practice patterns related to the use of sedation/anesthesia for diagnostic imaging in pediatric radiology departments.

Objective

To understand current practice patterns related to imaging with sedation/anesthesia in pediatric radiology departments based on a survey of the Society of Chiefs of Radiology at Children’s Hospitals (SCORCH) in conjunction with the American College of Radiology’s Pediatric Imaging Sedation and Anesthesia Committee.

Materials and methods

A multi-question survey related to imaging with sedation/anesthesia in pediatric radiology departments was distributed to SCORCH member institutions in January 2019. A single reminder email was sent. Descriptive statistical analyses were performed.

Results

Of the 84 pediatric radiology departments, 23 (27%) completed the survey. Fifty-seven percent of the respondents self-identified as academic/university-affiliated and 13% as a division/section in an adult radiology department. Imaging sedation (excluding general anesthesia) is commonly performed by pediatric anesthesiologists (76%) and intensive care unit physicians (intensivists, 48%); only 14% of departments expect their pediatric radiologists to supervise imaging sedation. Ninety-six percent of departments use child life specialists for patient preparation. Seventy percent of departments have preparatory resources available on a website, including simulation videos (26%) and audio clips (17%). Nearly half (48%) of the departments have a mock scanner to aid in patient preparation. Imaging sedation/anesthesia is most often scheduled at the request of ordering clinicians (65%), while 57% of departments allow schedulers to place patients into imaging sedation/anesthesia slots based on specified criteria.

Conclusion

Imaging sedation/anesthesia practice patterns vary among pediatric radiology departments, and understanding current approaches can help with standardization and practice improvement.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Frush DP, Bisset GS 3rd, Hall SC (1996) Pediatric sedation in radiology: the practice of safe sleep. AJR Am J Roentgenol 167:1381–1387

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Slovis TL (2011) Sedation and anesthesia issues in pediatric imaging. Pediatr Radiol 41(Suppl 2):514–516

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Cravero JP, Beach ML, Blike GT et al (2009) The incidence and nature of adverse events during pediatric sedation/anesthesia with propofol for procedures outside the operating room: a report from the Pediatric Sedation Research Consortium. Anesth Analg 108:795–8044

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Rudder BS, Easley SJ, Robinson AL et al (2019) Effects of an MRI Try Without program on patient access. Pediatr Radiol 49:1712–1717

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Jaimes C, Gee MS (2016) Strategies to minimize sedation in pediatric body magnetic resonance imaging. Pediatr Radiol 46:916–927

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. McGee K (2003) The role of a child life specialist in a pediatric radiology department. Pediatr Radiol 33:467–474

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Tyson ME, Bohl DD, Blickman JG (2014) A randomized controlled trial: child life services in pediatric imaging. Pediatr Radiol 44:1426–1432

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Szeszak S, Man R, Love A et al (2016) Animated educational video to prepare children for MRI without sedation: evaluation of the appeal and value. Pediatr Radiol 46:1744–1750

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Brown RKJ, Petty S, O'Malley S et al (2018) Virtual reality tool simulates MRI experience. Tomography 4:95–98

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Morel B, Andersson F, Samalbide M et al (2020) Impact on child and parent anxiety level of a teddy bear-scale mock magnetic resonance scanner. Pediatr Radiol 50:116–120

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Barnea-Goraly N, Weinzimer SA, Ruedy KJ et al (2014) High success rates of sedation-free brain MRI scanning in young children using simple subject preparation protocols with and without a commercial mock scanner — the Diabetes Research in Children Network (DirecNet) experience. Pediatr Radiol 44:181–186

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Carter AJ, Greer M-LC, Gray SE, Ware RS (2010) Mock MRI: reducing the need for anaesthesia in children. Pediatr Radiol 40:1368–1374

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. de Bie HMA, Boersma M, Wattjes MP et al (2010) Preparing children with a mock scanner training protocol results in high quality structural and functional MRI scans. Eur J Pediatr 169:1079–1085

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Edwards AD, Arthurs OJ (2011) Paediatric MRI under sedation: is it necessary? What is the evidence for the alternatives? Pediatr Radiol 41:1353–1364

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Vanderby SA, Babyn PS, Carter MW et al (2010) Effect of anesthesia and sedation on pediatric MR imaging patient flow. Radiology 256:229–237

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Wilder RT, Flick RP, Sprung J et al (2009) Early exposure to anesthesia and learning disabilities in a population-based birth cohort. Anesthesiology 110:796–804

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Creeley C, Dikranian K, Dissen G et al (2013) Propofol-induced apoptosis of neurones and oligodendrocytes in fetal and neonatal rhesus macaque brain. Br J Anaesth 110(Suppl 1):i29–i38

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Callahan MJ, MacDougall RD, Bixby SD et al (2018) Ionizing radiation from computed tomography versus anesthesia for magnetic resonance imaging in infants and children: patient safety considerations. Pediatr Radiol 48:21–30

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Barton K, Nickerson JP, Higgins T, Williams RK (2018) Pediatric anesthesia and neurotoxicity: what the radiologist needs to know. Pediatr Radiol 48:31–36

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank Dr. Richard Barth, ACR Pediatric Commission Chair, and the Society of Chiefs of Radiology at Children’s Hospitals (SCORCH) their help with this study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jonathan R. Dillman.

Ethics declarations

Conflicts of interest

None

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Appendix

Appendix

Table 2

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Dillman, J.R., Gee, M.S., Ward, C.G. et al. Imaging sedation and anesthesia practice patterns in pediatric radiology departments — a survey of the Society of Chiefs of Radiology at Children’s Hospitals (SCORCH). Pediatr Radiol 51, 1497–1502 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00247-021-04996-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00247-021-04996-y

Keywords

Navigation