Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

The positive color Doppler sign post biopsy: effectiveness of US-directed compression in achieving hemostasis

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Pediatric Radiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Percutaneous biopsies of soft-tissue organs are frequently performed using US guidance. US permits visualization of blood flow on color Doppler imaging.

Objective

To report the presence of color Doppler signal (positive color Doppler sign) along the biopsy tract after percutaneous needle biopsy of the liver and kidney as an indication of bleeding and to describe US-guided hemostasis.

Materials and methods

A case-control study of US-guided liver and kidney biopsies performed between January 2005 and September 2009 was undertaken. All pediatric patients with a positive color Doppler sign along the biopsy tract were included. Controls consisted of patients in whom no color Doppler sign was identified.

Results

Fifty-three cases with positive color Doppler sign were identified. One hundred and six matched controls were selected. The average compression time was 9.2 min in kidney and 8.4 min in liver cases. US-guided compression achieved cessation of the positive color Doppler sign in all cases. There was no significant difference between the mean pre- and post-procedure hemoglobin and platelet levels between kidney cases and controls (P = 0.68 and P = 0.63, respectively) and between liver cases and controls (P = 0.45 and P = 0.80).

Conclusion

Color Doppler US can detect bleeding post percutaneous liver and kidney biopsies. US-guided compression is effective in obliterating the color Doppler signal and achieving appropriate hemostasis.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Long BW (2000) Image-guided percutaneous needle biopsy: an overview. Radiol Technol 71:335–359, quiz 360–363

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Bach D, Hanraths M, Maar K et al (1998) Ultrasound guided percutaneous biopsy or operative biopsy in patients with kidney impairment? Int Urol Nephrol 20:519–523

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Caturelli E, Giacobbe A, Facciorusso D et al (1996) Percutaneous biopsy in diffuse liver disease: increasing diagnostic yield and decreasing complication rate by routine ultrasound assessment of puncture site. Am J Gastroenterol 91:1318–1321

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Pasha T, Gabriel S, Therneau T et al (1998) Cost-effectiveness of ultrasound-guided liver biopsy. Hepatology 27:1220–1226

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Sebire N, Roebuck D (2006) Pathological diagnosis of pediatric tumours from image-guided needle core biopsies: a systematic review. Pediatr Radiol 36:426–431

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Chahal PS, Ready J (2002) Hemothorax after percutaneous liver biopsy: an unusual complication. Am J Gastroenterol 97:1068–1069

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Eiro M, Katoh T, Watanabe T (2005) Risk factors for bleeding complications in percutaneous kidney biopsy. Clin Exp Nephrol 9:40–45

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Hoffer FA (2000) Liver biopsy methods for pediatric oncology patients. Pediatr Radiol 30:481–488

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Omary RA, Bettmann MA, Cardella JF et al (2003) Quality improvement guidelines for the reporting and archiving of interventional radiology procedures. J Vasc Interv Radiol 14(9 Pt 2):S293–295

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Chesney DS, Brouhard BH, Cunningham RJ (1996) Safety and cost effectiveness of pediatric percutaneous kidney biopsy. Pediatr Nephrol 10:493–495

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Feneberg R, Schaefer F, Zieger B et al (1998) Percutaneous kidney biopsy in children: a 27-year experience. Nephron 79:438–446

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Waldo B, Korbet SM, Freimanis MG et al (2009) The value of post-biopsy ultrasound in predicting complications after percutaneous kidney biopsy of native kidneys. Nephrol Dial Transplant 24:2433–2439

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Korbet SM (2002) Percutaneous kidney biopsy. Semin Nephrol 22:254–267

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Stratta P, Canavese C, Marengo M et al (2007) Risk management of kidney biopsy: 1, 387 cases over 30 years in a single centre. Eur J Clin Investig 37:954–963

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. McVay PA, Toy PT (1990) Lack of increased bleeding after liver biopsy in patients with mild hemostatic abnormalities. Am J Clin Pathol 94:747–753

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Amaral JG, Schwartz J, Chait P et al (2006) Sonographically guided percutaneous liver biopsy in infants: a retrospective review. Am J Roentgenol 187:W644–W649

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgment

The authors would like to thank Dr. Abdallah Alghamdi for his great help in statistical analysis.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Bairbre Connolly.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Alotaibi, M., Shrouder-Henry, J., Amaral, J. et al. The positive color Doppler sign post biopsy: effectiveness of US-directed compression in achieving hemostasis. Pediatr Radiol 41, 362–368 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00247-010-1848-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00247-010-1848-7

Keywords

Navigation