Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Permanent Cardiac Pacing in Pediatric Patients

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Pediatric Cardiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Pediatric pacemaker (PM) implants comprise less than 1 % of all PM implants. This study aimed to investigate permanent cardiac pacing among the pediatric population, identifying different indications and complications of pediatric cardiac pacing, especially focusing on the effect of the pacing sites, the PM lead type, and the indications for pacing. The current work is a cross-sectional study of 103 procedures for permanent PM insertion in pediatric patients between January 2001 and December 2010. The patients were followed up 1, 3, and 6 months after implantation, then every 6 months or as needed. Evaluation included routine clinical examination, electrocardiography, chest X-ray, echocardiography, and a full analysis of the pacing system measurements. The ages of the patients ranged from 0.09 to 12 years (median, 2.3 years). The most common indication for pacing was postoperative complete heart bock, noted in 54 patients (52.4 %). Transvenous endocardial PM insertion was performed in 92 procedures (89.3 %), whereas transthoracic epicardial insertion was performed in 11 procedures (10.7 %). The most common site of pacing was the right ventricular apex (n = 64, 62 %), followed by the right ventricular outflow tract (n = 25, 24.3 %). Transthoracic epicardial PM insertion was associated with a significantly higher percentage and greater severity of complications. In this study, 65 % of the patients with left ventricle (LV) dilation before pacing showed a significant improvement in LV dimensions and function after pacing. This was noted only in those with endocardially inserted PM leads in both the congenital and the postoperative groups regardless of the pacing site. Endocardial PM insertion in children is a safe procedure with fewer complications and a lower ventricular threshold than the epicardial route. Permanent single-chamber right ventricle pacing is safe and can lead to significant improvement in LV function and dimensions. However, long-term follow-up assessment is needed for further evaluation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Antretter H, Colvin J, Schweigmann U, Hangler H, Höfer D, Dunst K, Margreiter J, Laufer G (2003) Special problems of pacing in children. Indian Pacing Electrophysiol J 3:23

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Batra AS, Wells WJ, Hinoki KW, Stanton RA, Silka MJ (2003) Late recovery of atrioventricular conduction after pacemaker implantation for complete heart block associated with surgery for congenital heart disease. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 125:1291–1293

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Brockmeier K, Ulmer HE, Hessling G (2002) Termination of atrial reentrant tachycardias by using transesophageal atrial pacing. J Electrocardiol 35:159–163

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Çeliker A, Başpınar O, Karagöz T (2007) Transvenous cardiac pacing in children: problems and complications during follow-up. Original investigation. Anadolu Kardiyol Derg 7:292–297

    Google Scholar 

  5. Doniger SJ, Sharieff GQ (2006) Pediatric dysrhythmias. Pediatr Clin North Am 53(1):85–105

    Google Scholar 

  6. Ector B, Willems R, Heidbüchel H, Gewillig M, Mertens L, Meyns B, Daenen W, Ector H (2006) Epicardial pacing: a single-centre study on 321 leads in 138 patients. Acta Cardiol 61:343–351

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Fortescue EB, Berul CI, Cecchin F, Walsh EP, Triedman JK, Alexander ME (2004) Patient, procedural, and hardware factors associated with pacemaker lead failures in pediatrics and congenital heart disease. Heart Rhythm 1:150–159

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Gebauer RA, Tomek V, Salameh A, Marek J, Chaloupecký V, Gebauer R, Matějka T, Vojtovič P, Janoušek J (2009) Predictors of left ventricular remodelling and failure in right ventricular pacing in the young. Eur Heart J 30:1097–1104

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Gross GJ, Chiu CC, Hamilton RM, Kirsh JA, Stephenson EA (2006) Natural history of postoperative heart block in congenital heart disease: implications for pacing intervention. Heart Rhythm 3:601–604

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Kammeraad JA, Rosenthal E, Bostock J, Rogers J, Sreeram N (2004) Endocardial pacemaker implantation in infants weighing < or = 10 kilograms. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 27:1466–1474

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Karpawich PP (2004) Chronic right ventricular pacing and cardiac performance: the pediatric perspective. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 27:844–849

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Kumor M, Baranowski R, Koźluk E, Walczak F (2010) Is the diagnostic function of pacemakers a reliable source of information about ventricular arrhythmias? Cardiol J 17:495–502

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. McLeod KA (2010) Cardiac pacing in infants and children. Heart 96:1502–1508

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Nolasco RR, Avalos OM, Diez RG, Carrillo JC, Machuca RJ, De Haro S, Villacorta CH (2009) Transvenous pacing in children weighing less than 10 kilograms. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 32:177–181

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Odim J, Suckow B, Saedi B, Laks H, Shannon K (2008) Equivalent performance of epicardial versus endocardial permanent pacing in children: a single-institution and manufacturer experience. Ann Thorac Surg 85:1412–1416

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Post MC, Budts W, Van de Bruaene A, Willems R, Meyns B, Rega F, Gewillig M (2011) Failure of epicardial pacing leads in congenital heart disease: not uncommon and difficult to predict. Neth Heart J 19(7–8):331–335

    Google Scholar 

  17. Sachweh JS, Vazquez-Jimenez JF, Schöndube FA, Daebritz SH, Dörge H, Mühler EG, Messmer BJ (2000) Twenty years experience with pediatric pacing: epicardial and transvenous stimulation. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 17:455–461

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Shalganov TN, Paprika D, Vatasescu R, Kardos A, Mihalcz A, Kornyei L, Szatmari A, Szili-Torok T (2007) Midterm echocardiographic follow-up of left ventricular function with permanent right ventricular pacing in pediatric patients with and without structural heart disease. Cardiovasc Ultrasound 5:13

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Silvetti MS, Drago F (2006) Upgrading of VVIR pacemakers with nonfunctional endocardial ventricular leads to VDD pacemakers in adolescents. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 29:691–696

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Silvetti MS, De Santis A, Grovale N, Grutter G, Baccarini A, Drago F (2007) Ventricular pacing threshold variations in the young. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 30:175–181

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Soongswang J, Nana A, Laohaprasittiporn D, Durongpisitkul K, Chanthong P, KhaoSa-Ard B, Punlee K, Kangkakate C, Udompunturuk S (2005) Permanent cardiac pacing in pediatrics: experience in Thailand. J Med Assoc Thai 88:106–114

    Google Scholar 

  22. Toogood G (2007) Pacemaker therapies in cardiology. Aust Fam Physician 36:518–524

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Udink ten Cate F, Breur J, Boramanand N, Crosson J, Friedman A, Brenner J, Meijboom E, Sreeram N (2002) Endocardial and epicardial steroid lead pacing in the neonatal and paediatric age group. Heart 88:392–396

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Welisch E, Cherlet E, Crespo-Martinez E, Hansky B (2010) From pacing and clinical electrophysiology: a single-institution experience with pacemaker implantation in a pediatric population over 25 years. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 33:1112–1118

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Pediatrics, Pediatric Cardiology, Faculty of Medicine, Cairo University, Cairo, Egypt

    Wael Lotfy, Ranya Hegazy, Osama AbdElAziz, Rodina Sobhy & Fawzan Shaltout

  2. Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Cairo University, Cairo, Egypt

    Hossam Hasanein

  3. 3 Ramez st. off Shehab st. Apartment 51, Mohandeseen, Giza, Egypt

    Ranya Hegazy

Authors
  1. Wael Lotfy
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Ranya Hegazy
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Osama AbdElAziz
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Rodina Sobhy
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Hossam Hasanein
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Fawzan Shaltout
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ranya Hegazy.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lotfy, W., Hegazy, R., AbdElAziz, O. et al. Permanent Cardiac Pacing in Pediatric Patients. Pediatr Cardiol 34, 273–280 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00246-012-0433-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00246-012-0433-2

Keywords

Search

Navigation