Skip to main content
Log in

Use of specific peptide biomarkers for quantitative confirmation of hidden allergenic peanut proteins Ara h 2 and Ara h 3/4 for food control by liquid chromatography–tandem mass spectrometry

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A liquid chromatography–electrospray-tandem mass spectrometry (LC–ESI-MS–MS) method based on the detection of biomarker peptides from allergenic proteins was devised for confirming and quantifying peanut allergens in foods. Peptides obtained from tryptic digestion of Ara h 2 and Ara h 3/4 proteins were identified and characterized by LC–MS and LC–MS–MS with a quadrupole-time of flight mass analyzer. Four peptides were chosen and investigated as biomarkers taking into account their selectivity, the absence of missed cleavages, the uniform distribution in the Ara h 2 and Ara h 3/4 protein isoforms together with their spectral features under ESI-MS–MS conditions, and good repeatability of LC retention time. Because of the different expression levels, the selection of two different allergenic proteins was proved to be useful in the identification and univocal confirmation of the presence of peanuts in foodstuffs. Using rice crispy and chocolate-based snacks as model food matrix, an LC–MS–MS method with triple quadrupole mass analyzer allowed good detection limits to be obtained for Ara h2 (5 μg protein g−1 matrix) and Ara h3/4 (1 μg protein g−1 matrix). Linearity of the method was established in the 10–200 μg g−1 range of peanut proteins in the food matrix investigated. Method selectivity was demonstrated by analyzing tree nuts (almonds, pecan nuts, hazelnuts, walnuts) and food ingredients such as milk, soy beans, chocolate, cornflakes, and rice crispy.

ESI-QTOF-MS mass spectrum of Ara h3/4 triptig digest

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Grundy J, Matthews S, Bateman B, Dean T, Arshad SH (2002) J Allergy Clin Immunol 110:784–789

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Bock SA, Munoz-Furlong A, Sampson HA (2001) J Allergy Clin Immunol 107:191–193

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Rangaraj S, Ramanathan V, Tuthill DP, Spear E, Hourihane JO, Alfaham M (2004) Pediatr Allergy Immunol 15:449–453

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Sicherer SH, Leung DY (2005) J Allergy Clin Immunol 116:153–163

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Hourihane JB, Kilburn SA, Nordlee JA, Hefle SL, Taylor SL, Warner JO (1997) J Allergy Clin Immunol 100:596–600

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Kemp SF, Lockey RF (1996) JAMA 275:1636–1637

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Vierk K, Falci K, Wolyniak C, Klontz KC (2002) J Allergy Clin Immunol 109:1022–1026

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Joshi P, Mofidi S, Sicherer SH (2002) J Allergy Clin Immunol 109:1019–1021

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Directive 2003/89/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 10 November 2003 amending Directive 2000/13/EC, Official Journal of the European Union 25.11.2003, L 308/15

  10. Humieres J, Wal JM (2004) Allergy 59:1259–1261

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Mills EN, Valovirta E, Madsen C, Taylor SL, Vieths S, Anklam E (2004) Allergy 59:1262–1268

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Schmitt D, Cheng H, Maleki J (2004) JAOAC Int 87:1492–1497

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Whitaker TB, Williams KM, Trucksess MW, Slate AB (2005) JAOAC Int 88:161–174

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Hird H, Lloyd J, Goodier R, Brown J, Reece P (2003) Eur Food Res Technol 217:265–268

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Careri M, Elviri L, Mangia A, Mucchino C (2007) Anal Bioanal Chem 387:1851–1854

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. de Jong EC, Van Zijverden M, Spanhaak S (1998) Clin Exp Allergy 28:743–751

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Clarke MC, Kilburn SA, Hourihane JO (1998) Clin Exp Allergy 28:1251–1257

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Shefcheck KJ, Musser SM (2004) J Agric Food Chem 52:2785–2790

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Shefcheck KJ, Callahan JH, Musser SM (2006) J Agric Food Chem 54:7953–7959

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Chassaigne H, Nørgaard JV, van Hengel A (2007) J Agric Food Chem 55:4461–4473

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Chatel JM, Bernard H, Orson FM (2003) Int Arch Allergy Immunol 131:14–18

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Stanley JS, King N, Burks AW, Huang SK, Sampson H, Cockrell G, Helm RM, West CM, Bannon GA (1997) Arch Biochem Biophys 342:244–253

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Xiang P, Beardslee TA, Zeece MG, Markwell J, Saratha G (2002) Arch Biochem Biophys 408:51–57

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors acknowledge funding support from MIUR (Ministero dell’Istruzione, dell’Università e della Ricerca, Italy), PRIN 2004 Project “Identification of allergenic proteins from peanuts and hazelnuts in foods as a consequence of process contamination or adulteration; determination by mass spectrometry-based methods”.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to L. Elviri.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Careri, M., Costa, A., Elviri, L. et al. Use of specific peptide biomarkers for quantitative confirmation of hidden allergenic peanut proteins Ara h 2 and Ara h 3/4 for food control by liquid chromatography–tandem mass spectrometry. Anal Bioanal Chem 389, 1901–1907 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00216-007-1595-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00216-007-1595-2

Keywords

Navigation