Skip to main content
Log in

Evaluation of hip fracture risk in relation to fall direction

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Osteoporosis International Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to evaluate hip fracture risk in relation to fall direction, and to elucidate factors that influence the impact force in falls on the hip. Eight healthy volunteers performed deliberate falls in three directions (lateral, posterolateral and posterior) on a force platform covered by a mattress of 13 cm thickness. Fall descent motions and impact postures were examined by a three-dimensional analyzer. The maximum ground force reaction, velocity of the greater trochanter at impact, and activity of quadriceps and gluteus medius were measured. In all trials of lateral and posterolateral falls, but not of posterior falls, the subjects hit their greater trochanter directly on the mattress. The impact forces were between 2,000 N and 4,000 N. Posterolateral falls showed significantly higher velocity at impact than did posterior falls. The height and the lower limb length exhibited positive correlations with the impact force in all directions of fall. In the lateral fall, there was a positive correlation between the activity of quadriceps and the impact force. In view of the impact point, force, and velocity, the posterolateral fall seemed to carry the highest risk of hip fracture.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Hayes WC, Myers WR (1997) Biomechanical considerations of hip and spine fractures in osteoporotic bone. AAOS Instructional Course Lecture 46:431–438

    Google Scholar 

  2. Province MA, Hadley EC, Hornbrook MC et al (1995) The effects of exercise on fall in elderly patients. A preplanned meta-analysis of the FICSIT trial. JAMA 273:1341–1347

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Campbell AJ, Robertson MC, Gardner MM et al (1997) Randomised controlled trial of a general practice programme of home based exercise to prevent falls in elderly women. BMJ 315:1065–1069

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Close J, Ellis M, Hooper R et al (1999) Prevention of falls in the elderly trial (PROFET): a randomized controlled trial. Lancet 53:93–97

    Google Scholar 

  5. Lauritzen JB, Petersen MM, Lund B (1993) Effect of external hip protectors on hip fractures. Lancet 341:11–13

    Google Scholar 

  6. Ekman A, Mallmin H, Michaelsson K et al (1997) External hip protectors to prevent osteoporotic hip fractures. Lancet 350:563–564

    Google Scholar 

  7. Kannus P, Parkkari J, Niemi S et al (2000) Prevention of hip fracture in elderly people with use of a hip protector. N Engl J Med 343:1506–1513

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Harada A, Mizuno M, Takemura M et al (2002) Hip fracture prevention trial using hip protector in Japanese nursing homes. Osteoporos Int 12:215–221

    Google Scholar 

  9. Hausenlmann HJ, Rizzoli R (2003) A comprehensive review of treatments for postmenopausal osteoporosis. Osteoporos Int 14:2–12

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Schwartz AV, Kelsey JL, Sidney S et al (1998) Characteristics of falls and risk of hip fracture in elderly men. Osteoporos Int 8:240–246

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Greenspan SL, Myers ER, Kiel DP et al (1998) Fall direction, bone mineral density, and function: risk factors for hip fracture in frail nursing home elderly. Am J Med 104:539–545

    Google Scholar 

  12. Iida H, Nakamura T, Kanzaki H et al (1997) A new gait analysis system using computer graphics. Journal of Japanese Society for Clinical Biomechanics 18:373–377

    Google Scholar 

  13. Nevitt, MC, Cummings SR (1993) Type of fall and risk of hip and wrist fracture: the study of osteoporotic fractures. J Am Geriatr Soc 41:1226–1234

    Google Scholar 

  14. Greenspan SL, Myers WR, Maitland LA et al (1994) Fall severity and bone mineral density as risk factors for hip fracture in ambulatory elderly. JAMA 271:128–133

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Lozt JC, Hayes WC (1990) The use of quantitative computed tomography to estimate risk of fracture of the hip from falls. J Bone Joint Surg Am 72:689–700

    Google Scholar 

  16. Courtney AC, Wachtel EF, Myers ER et al (1995) Age-related reductions in the strength of the femur tested in a fall-loading configuration. J Bone Joint Surg Am 77:387–395

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Okuizumi H, Harada A, Iwata H et al (1998) Effect on the femur of a new hip fracture preventive system using dropped-weight impact testing .J Bone Miner Res 13:1940–1944

    Google Scholar 

  18. Harada A, Matsui Y (2002) Falls and fracture in elderly people. Orthopaedic Surgery and Traumatology 45:715–722

    Google Scholar 

  19. Nikaido T, Sakaguchi K, Oka M et al (2000) Biomechanical research of the femoral neck fracture. Journal of Japanese Society for Clinical Biomechanics 21:385–391

    Google Scholar 

  20. Oka M, Shima H, Hayami N (2003) Study on falling. Journal of Japanese Society for Clinical Biomechanics 24:314–48

    Google Scholar 

  21. Robinovitch SN, Hayes WC, McMahon TA (1991) Prediction of femoral impact forces in falls on the hip. J Biomech Eng 113:366–374

    Google Scholar 

  22. Robinovitch SN, McMahon TA, Hayes WC (1995) Force attenuation in trochanteric soft tissue during impacts from a fall. J Orthop Res 13:956–962

    Google Scholar 

  23. Grisso JA, Kelsey JL (1997) Risk factors for hip fracture in men. Am J Epidemiol 145:786–793

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Cummings SR, Nevitt MC, Browner WS et al (1995) Risk factors for hip fracture in white women. N Engl J Med 332:767–773

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Kroonenberg AJ, Hayes WC, McMahon TA (1996) Hip impact velocities and body configurations for voluntary falls from standing height. J Biomech 29:807–811

    Google Scholar 

  26. Sabick MB, Hay JG, Goel VK et al (1999) Active responses decrease impact forces at the hip and shoulder in falls to the side. J Biomech 32:993–998

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank Atsushi Iwashita, R.P.T., and Minako Hirakawa, R.P.T., for their helpful discussions and technical assistance. We also thank all the volunteers for participating in the study

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Manabu Nankaku.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Nankaku, M., Kanzaki, H., Tsuboyama, T. et al. Evaluation of hip fracture risk in relation to fall direction. Osteoporos Int 16, 1315–1320 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00198-005-1843-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00198-005-1843-2

Keywords

Navigation