Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Pelvic floor muscle evaluation in incontinent patients

  • Original Article
  • Published:
International Urogynecology Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The aim of this study was to assess pelvic floor muscle (PFM) strength and perception and its correlation with stress urinary incontinence (SUI). One hundred and one women were divided into two groups according to the presence (G1=51 patients) or absence (G2=50 patients) of SUI. Subjective [urine stream interruption test (UST), visual survey of perineal contraction and transvaginal digital palpation to assess pelvic muscle contraction] and objective evaluations of pelvic floor muscles in all patients were performed (vaginal manometry). During the UST, 25.5% of G1 patients and 80% of G2 patients were able to interrupt the urine stream (p<0.05). Digital evaluation of pelvic muscular contraction showed higher strength in G2 than in G1 patients (p<0.0001). Perineometer evaluation of PFM strength was significantly higher in the continent group (p<0.001). Pelvic floor muscle weakness in incontinent patients demonstrates the importance of functional and objective evaluation of this group of muscles.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Gosling JA, Dixon JS, Critchley HOD (1981) A comparative study of the human external sphincter and periurethral levator ani muscles. Br J Urol 53:35–41

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Delancey JOL (1988) Structural aspects of the extrinsic continence mechanism. Obstet Gynecol 72:296–301

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Zacharin RF (1980) Pulsion enterocele: review of functional anatomy of the pelvic floor. Obstet Gynecol 55:135–140

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Bressler H, Shuessler B (2003) Childbirth-induced trauma to the urethral continence mechanism: review and recommendations. Urology 62:39–44

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Amaro JL, Gameiro MOO, Padovani CR (2003) Treatment of urinary stress incontinence by intravaginal electrical stimulation and pelvic floor physiotherapy. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 14:204–208

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Bo K (2003) Pelvic floor muscle strength and response to pelvic muscle training for stress urinary incontinence. Neurourol Urodyn 22:654–658

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Satore A, Pregazzi R, Bartoli P, Grimaldi E, Ricci G, Gurschino S (2002) The urine stream interruption test and pelvic muscle function in the puerperium. Int J Gynecol Obstet 78:235–239

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Kegel AH (1948) Progressive resistance exercise in the functional restoration of the muscles. Am J Obstet Gynecol 56:238–249

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Morkved S, Salvesen KA, Bo K, Eik-Nes S (2004) Pelvic floor muscle strength and thickness in continent and incontinent nulliparous pregnant women. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 15:384–390

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Deveuse A, Staes F, De Weerdt W, Feys H, Van Assche A, Penninckx F, Vereecken R (2004) Clinical evaluation of pelvic floor muscle function in continent and incontinent women. Neurourol Urodyn 23:190–197

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Lynch CM, Aronoff CK (2003) Reproducibility of grading scales of pelvic muscle strength: standard versus tampon scale. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 14:288–290

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Goodman LA (1965) On simultaneous confidence intervals for multinomial proportions. Technometrics 7:247–254

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Norman GR, Streiner DL (1994) Biostatistics—the bare essentials. Mosby Year Book, St Louis, p 260

    Google Scholar 

  14. Sampelle CM, Delancey JOL (1992) The urine stream interruption test and pelvic muscle function. Nurs Res 41:73–77

    Google Scholar 

  15. Bo K, Finckenhagen B (2003) Is these any difference in measurement of pelvic floor muscle strength in supine and standing position? Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 82:1120–1125

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Bo K, Kibrstein B, Hagen R, Larsen S (1990) Pelvic floor muscle exercise for the treatment of female stress urinary incontinence. II. Validity of vaginal pressure measurements of pelvic floor muscle strength and the necessity of supplementary methods for control of correct contraction. Neurourol Urodyn 9:479–487

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Faculdade de Medicina de Botucatu, Department of Urology, School of Medicine, São Paulo State University (UNESP), Botucatu, 18618-970, Brazil

    João Luiz Amaro

  2. Physiotherapy Department, Health Sciences Center, Paraná State University, Paraná, Brazil

    Eliane Cristina Hilberath Moreira

  3. School of Medicine, São Paulo State University (UNESP), Botucatu, Brazil

    Mônica Orsi Gameiro

  4. Department of Biostatistics, School of Medicine, São Paulo State University (UNESP), Botucatu, Brazil

    Carlos Roberto Padovani

Authors
  1. João Luiz Amaro
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Eliane Cristina Hilberath Moreira
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Mônica Orsi Gameiro
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Carlos Roberto Padovani
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to João Luiz Amaro.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Amaro, J.L., Moreira, E.C.H., Gameiro, M.O. et al. Pelvic floor muscle evaluation in incontinent patients. Int Urogynecol J 16, 352–354 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-004-1256-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-004-1256-3

Keywords

Search

Navigation