Skip to main content
Log in

Training with biofeedback devices improves clinical outcome compared to usual care in patients with unilateral TKA: a systematic review

  • KNEE
  • Published:
Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy Aims and scope

Abstract

Purpose

Biofeedback following total knee arthroplasty (TKA) seems to be a feasible approach to improve rehabilitation, outcomes, mobility and reduce pain. This systematic review gives the practicing orthopedic surgeon a summary of what is available and how biofeedback affects clinical outcomes.

Methods

We reviewed the current literature regarding methods, devices and effects of biofeedback in patients who underwent total knee arthroplasty. Embase, Pubmed, Web of Science, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials were searched from inception to May 2018 for the following keywords: Biofeedback OR Feedback AND Total Knee Arthroplasty OR TKA. Data were extracted according to a predefined setting (see Protocol for systematic review on PROSPEO). Devices used for biofeedback were recorded. Demographics, training methods and effects were also collected.

Results

The search resulted in 380 potentially eligible studies from which 11 met all inclusion criteria including 7 randomized controlled trials (RCTs), 3 cohort studies, and 1 cross-sectional study. A total of 416 patients with unilateral TKA were included, with an average of 37.8 patients per study. In patients with TKA, significant improvements in activity scores or pain were reported by 9 of 11 studies. Only two of the studies reported no significant influence of the feedback on the chosen outcome parameters. Devices for biofeedback varied between studies and included the use of a goniometer, force plate, balance board, treadmill, and/or electromyography (EMG). The most common type of feedback was visual followed by audio, with one study mentioning that the audio mode was preferred by the patients as it was easier to handle. Overall, 5 out of 6 different methods demonstrated a potential value for improving mobility and decreasing pain.

Conclusions

This review suggests that biofeedback in early postoperative rehabilitation after TKA is effective in improving gait symmetry, reducing pain and increasing activity level. It should be noted that the great variety of devices used for feedback limits comparisons between studies.

Level of evidence

IIa.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

EMG:

Electromyography

FB:

Feedback

FTSST:

Five-time sit to stand test

RCT:

Randomized controlled trial

TKA:

Total knee arthroplasty

TUG:

Timed up and go test

VAS:

Visual analog scale

WOMAC:

Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index

References

  1. Bączkowicz D, Skiba G, Czerner M, Majorczyk E (2018) Gait and functional status analysis before and after total knee arthroplasty. Knee 25:888–896

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Baláš J, Panáčková M, Jandová S, Martin AJ, Strejcová B, Vomáčko L, Charousek J, Cochrane DJ, Hamlin M, Draper N (2014) The effect of climbing ability and slope inclination on vertical foot loading using a novel force sensor instrumentation system. J Hum Kinet 44:75–81

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Barrios JA, Crossley KM, Davis IS (2010) Gait retraining to reduce the knee adduction moment through real-time visual feedback of dynamic knee alignment. J Biomech 43:2208–2213

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Bourne RB, Chesworth BM, Davis AM, Mahomed NN, Charron KDJ (2010) Patient satisfaction after total knee arthroplasty: who is satisfied and who is not? Clin Ort Relat Res 468:57–63

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Braun BJ, Bushuven E, Hell R, Veith NT, Buschbaum J, Holstein JH, Pohlemann T (2016) A novel tool for continuous fracture aftercare—clinical feasibility and first results of a new telemetric gait analysis insole. Injury 47:490–494

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Christensen JC, LaStayo PC, Marcus RL, Stoddard GJ, Bo Foreman K, Mizner RL, Peters CL, Pelt CE (2018) Visual knee-kinetic biofeedback technique normalizes gait abnormalities during high-demand mobility after total knee arthroplasty. Knee 25:73–82

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Christiansen CL, Bade MJ, Davidson BS, Dayton MR, Stevens-Lapsley JE (2015) Effects of Weight-bearing biofeedback training on functional movement patterns following total knee arthroplasty: a randomized controlled trial. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 45:647–655

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Dingwell JB, Davis BL, Frazier DM (1996) Use of an instrumented treadmill for real-time gait symmetry evaluation and feedback in normal and trans-tibial amputee subjects. Prosthet Orthot Int 20:101–110

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Döbele S, Deininger C, Sandmann GH, Schmitt A, Freude T, Stöckle U, Lucke M (2016) New method for monitoring partial weight bearing (PWB) of outpatients with an independent insole sensor system. Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech 83:88–93

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Downs SH, Black N (1998) The feasibility of creating a checklist for the assessment of the methodological quality both of randomised and non-randomised studies of health care interventions. J Epidemiol Community Health 52:377–384

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Fung V, Ho A, Shaffer J, Chung E, Gomez M (2012) Use of Nintendo Wii Fit™ in the rehabilitation of outpatients following total knee replacement: a preliminary randomised controlled trial. Physiotherapy 98:183–188

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Hardt S, Schulz MRG, Pfitzner T, Wassilew G, Horstmann H, Liodakis E, Weber-Spickschen TS (2018) Improved early outcome after TKA through an app-based active muscle training programme-a randomized-controlled trial. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-018-4918-2

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Kagan R, Anderson MB, Christensen JC, Peters CL, Gililland JM, Pelt CE (2018) The recovery curve for the patient-reported outcomes measurement information system patient-reported physical function and pain interference computerized adaptive tests after primary total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 33:2471–2474

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Kammerlander C, Pfeufer D, Lisitano LA, Mehaffey S, Böcker W, Neuerburg C (2018) Inability of older adult patients with hip fracture to maintain postoperative weight-bearing restrictions. J Bone Jt Surg Am 100:936–941

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Kuiken TA, Amir H, Scheidt RA (2004) Computerized biofeedback knee goniometer: acceptance and effect on exercise behavior in post-total knee arthroplasty rehabilitation. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 85:1026–1030

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Noble PC, Gordon MJ, Weiss JM, Reddix RN, Conditt MA, Mathis KB (2005) Does total knee replacement restore normal knee function? Clin Ort Relat Res 431:157–165

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Oh H-T, Hwangbo G (2018) The effects of proprioception exercise with and without visual feedback on the pain and balance in patients after total knee arthroplasty. J Phys Ther Sci 30:124–126

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Paxton RJ, Forster JE, Miller MJ, Gerron KL, Stevens-Lapsley JE, Christiansen CL (2018) A feasibility study for improved physical activity after total knee arthroplasty. J Aging Phys Act 26:7–13

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Shanb A-SA, Youssef EF (2014) Effects of adding biofeedback training to active exercises after total knee arthroplasty. J Musculoskelet Res 17(1):1450001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Wang T-J, Chang C-F, Lou M-F, Ao M-K, Liu C-C, Liang S-Y, Wu S-FV, Tung H-H (2015) Biofeedback relaxation for pain associated with continuous passive motion in Taiwanese patients after total knee arthroplasty. Res Nurs Health 38:39–50

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Wilk-Franczuk M, Zemla J, Sliwinski Z (2010) The application of biofeedback exercises in patients following arthroplasty of the knee with the use of total endoprosthesis. Med Sci Monit 16:CR423–CR426

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Zeni J, Abujaber S, Flowers P, Pozzi F, Snyder-Mackler L (2013) Biofeedback to promote movement symmetry after total knee arthroplasty: a feasibility study. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 43:715–726

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

CK, WB, CP, JG: Interpretation of data, revising manuscript, final approval. MA, NK, DP: Conception of design, acquisition and analysis of data, drafting manuscript, final approval.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Daniel Pfeufer.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors report no significant financial interests related to this research.

Additional information

Following the guidelines, our systematic review protocol was registered in the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO) on May 23, 2018 (registration number CRD42018095518).

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Pfeufer, D., Gililland, J., Böcker, W. et al. Training with biofeedback devices improves clinical outcome compared to usual care in patients with unilateral TKA: a systematic review. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 27, 1611–1620 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-018-5217-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-018-5217-7

Keywords

Navigation