Abstract
We present an algorithmic release approach to the varus knee, including a novel pie crust release technique of the superficial MCL, in 359 total knee arthroplasty patients and report the clinical and radiological outcome. Medio-lateral stability was evaluated as normal in 97% of group 0 (deep MCL), 95% of group 1 (pie crust superficial MCL) and 83% of group 2 (distal superficial MCL). The mean preoperative hip–knee angle was 174.0, 172.1, and 169.5 and was corrected postoperatively to 179.1, 179.2, and 177.6 for groups 0, 1, and 2, respectively. A satisfactory correction in the coronal plane was achieved in 82.9% of all-comers falling within the 180° ± 3° interval. An algorithmic release approach can be beneficial for soft tissue balancing. In all patients, the deep medial collateral ligament should be released and otseophytes removed. The novel pie crust technique of the superficial MCL is safe, efficient and reliable, provided a medial release of 6–8 mm or less is required. The release of the superficial MCL on the distal tibia is advocated in severe varus knees. Preoperative coronal alignment is an important predictor for the release technique, but should be combined with other parameters such as reducibility of the deformity and the obtained gap asymmetry.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Ahlbäck S (1968) Osteoarthrosis of the knee. A radiographic investigation. Acta Radiol Diagn (Stockh) Suppl 277:7–72
Bonnin M, Carillon Y (2004) Scanner analysis of the transepicondylar axis during flexion in healthy knees. J Bone Jt Surg Br 86:32
Bonnin M, Neyret Ph, Carillon Y, Chambat P (2006) Rotation femorale adapté à la morphologie femorale dans les PTG. Les Protheses du genou. Sauramps Medical, pp 13–23
Dubrana F, Lefevre C, Le Nen D, Neyret Ph (2004) Trucs et Astuces en chirurgie du genou. Sauramps Medical
Engh GA, Ammeen D (1999) Results of total knee arthroplasty with medial epicondylar osteotomy to correct varus deformity. Clin Orthop Relat Res 367:141–148
Insall JN, Dorr LD, Scott RD (1989) Rationale of the Knee Society clinical rating system. Clin Orthop Relat Res 248:13–24
Kim SJ, MacDonald M, Hernandez J, Wixson RLJ (2005) Computer assisted navigation in total knee arthroplasty: improved coronal alignment. Arthroplasty 20:123–131
Matziolis G, Krocker D, Weiss U, Tohtz S, Perka C (2007) A prospective, randomized study of computer-assisted and conventional total knee arthroplasty. Three-dimensional evaluation of implant alignment and rotation. J Bone Jt Surg Am 89:236–243
Ranawat CS, Flynn WF Jr, Saddler S (1993) Long-term results of the total condylar knee arthroplasty. A 15-year survivorship study. Clin Orthop Relat Res 286:94–102
Rand JA, Ilstrup DM (9200) Survivorship analysis of total knee arthroplasty. Cumulative rates of survival of total knee arthroplasties. J Bone Jt Surg (Am) 73:397–409
Ritter MA, Herbst SA, Keating EM (1994) Long-term survival analysis of a posterior cruciate-retaining total condylar total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 309:136–145
Whiteside LA, Saeki K, Mihalko WM (2000) Functional medial ligament balancing in total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 380:45–57
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Verdonk, P.C.M., Pernin, J., Pinaroli, A. et al. Soft tissue balancing in varus total knee arthroplasty: an algorithmic approach. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 17, 660–666 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-009-0755-7
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-009-0755-7