Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Might the surviving sepsis campaign international guidelines be less confusing? Authors’ reply

  • Correspondence
  • Published:
Intensive Care Medicine Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Reproduced with permission from https://www.sccm.org/SurvivingSepsisCampaign/Guidelines/Pediatric-Patients

References

  1. Weiss SL, Peters MJ, Alhazzani W et al (2020) Surviving sepsis campaign international guidelines for the management of septic shock and sepsis-associated organ dysfunction in children. Intensive Care Med 46(Suppl 1):10–67. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00134-019-05878-6

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Rudd KE, Johnson SC, Agesa KM et al (2020) Global, regional, and national sepsis incidence and mortality, 1990–2017: analysis for the global burden of disease study. Lancet 395(10219):200–211. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(19)32989-7

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Maitland K, Kiguli S, Opoka RO et al (2011) Mortality after fluid bolus in African children with severe infection. N Engl J Med 364(26):2483–2495. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1101549

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Weiss SL, Peters MJ (2019) Risks and benefits of fluid bolus therapy: the need for a good explanation. Arch Dis Child 104(12):1125–1126. https://doi.org/10.1136/archdischild-2019-317789

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Paediatric Intensive Care, Bicêtre Hospital, AP-HP Paris Saclay University, 78, Rue du Général Leclerc, 94275, Le Kremlin Bicêtre, France

    Pierre Tissieres

  2. NIHR Biomedical Research Centre, UCL Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health, London, England, UK

    Mark J. Peters

  3. British Columbia Children’s Hospital, Vancouver, BC, Canada

    Niranjan Kissoon

  4. Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA

    Scott L. Weiss

Authors
  1. Pierre Tissieres
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Mark J. Peters
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Niranjan Kissoon
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Scott L. Weiss
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Pierre Tissieres.

Ethics declarations

Conflicts of interest

All authors decline any conflict of interest related to the submitted manuscript.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Tissieres, P., Peters, M.J., Kissoon, N. et al. Might the surviving sepsis campaign international guidelines be less confusing? Authors’ reply. Intensive Care Med 46, 1658–1659 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00134-020-06158-4

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00134-020-06158-4

Search

Navigation