Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

The effects of performance status one week before hospital admission on the outcomes of critically ill patients

  • Original
  • Published:
Intensive Care Medicine Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

To assess the impact of performance status (PS) impairment 1 week before hospital admission on the outcomes in patients admitted to intensive care units (ICU).

Methods

Retrospective cohort study in 59,693 patients (medical admissions, 67 %) admitted to 78 ICUs during 2013. We classified PS impairment according to the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) scale in absent/minor (PS = 0–1), moderate (PS = 2) or severe (PS = 3–4). We used univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses to investigate the association between PS impairment and hospital mortality.

Results

PS impairment was moderate in 17.3 % and severe in 6.9 % of patients. The hospital mortality was 14.4 %. Overall, the worse the PS, the higher the ICU and hospital mortality and length of stay. In addition, patients with worse PS were less frequently discharged home. PS impairment was associated with worse outcomes in all SAPS 3, Charlson Comorbidity Index and age quartiles as well as according to the admission type. Adjusting for other relevant clinical characteristics, PS impairment was associated with higher hospital mortality (odds-ratio (OR) = 1.96 (95 % CI 1.63–2.35), for moderate and OR = 4.22 (3.32–5.35), for severe impairment). The effects of PS on the outcome were particularly relevant in the medium range of severity-of-illness. These results were consistent in the subgroup analyses. However, adding PS impairment to the SAPS 3 score improved only slightly its discriminative capability.

Conclusion

PS impairment was associated with worse outcomes independently of other markers of chronic health status, particularly for patients in the medium range of severity of illness.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Moreno RP, Metnitz PGH, Almeida E et al (2005) SAPS 3–from evaluation of the patient to evaluation of the intensive care unit. Part 2: development of a prognostic model for hospital mortality at ICU admission. Intensive Care Med 31:1345–1355. doi:10.1007/s00134-005-2763-5

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Salluh JIF, Soares M (2014) ICU severity of illness scores: APACHE, SAPS and MPM. Curr Opin Crit Care 20:557–565. doi:10.1097/MCC.0000000000000135

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Zimmerman JE, Kramer AA, McNair DS, Malila FM (2006) Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE) IV: hospital mortality assessment for today’s critically ill patients. Crit Care Med 34:1297–1310. doi:10.1097/01.CCM.0000215112.84523.F0

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Higgins TL, Teres D, Copes WS et al (2007) Assessing contemporary intensive care unit outcome: an updated Mortality Probability Admission Model (MPM0-III). Crit Care Med 35:827–835. doi:10.1097/01.CCM.0000257337.63529.9F

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Zampieri FG, Colombari F (2014) The impact of performance status and comorbidities on the short-term prognosis of very elderly patients admitted to the ICU. BMC Anesthesiol 14:59. doi:10.1186/1471-2253-14-59

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Rosolem MM, Rabello LSCF, Lisboa T et al (2012) Critically ill patients with cancer and sepsis: clinical course and prognostic factors. J Crit Care 27:301–307. doi:10.1016/j.jcrc.2011.06.014

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Torres VBL, Azevedo LCP, Silva UVA et al (2015) Sepsis-associated outcomes in critically ill patients with malignancies. Ann Am Thorac Soc 12:1185–1192. doi:10.1513/AnnalsATS.201501-046OC

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Bagshaw SM, Stelfox HT, McDermid RC et al (2014) Association between frailty and short- and long-term outcomes among critically ill patients: a multicentre prospective cohort study. CMAJ 186:E95–E102. doi:10.1503/cmaj.130639

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Park C-M, Koh Y, Jeon K et al (2014) Impact of Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status on hospital mortality in critically ill patients. J Crit Care 29:409–413. doi:10.1016/j.jcrc.2014.01.016

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Azoulay E, Mokart D, Pène F et al (2013) Outcomes of critically ill patients with hematologic malignancies: prospective multicenter data from France and Belgium–a groupe de recherche respiratoire en réanimation onco-hématologique study. J Clin Oncol 31:2810–2818. doi:10.1200/JCO.2012.47.2365

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Dolgin NH, Martins PNA, Movahedi B et al (2016) Functional status predicts postoperative mortality after liver transplantation. Clin Transplant. doi:10.1111/ctr.12808

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Soares M, Bozza FA, Angus DC et al (2015) Organizational characteristics, outcomes, and resource use in 78 Brazilian intensive care units: the ORCHESTRA study. Intensive Care Med 41:2149–2160. doi:10.1007/s00134-015-4076-7

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Vincent JL, Moreno R, Takala J et al (1996) The SOFA (Sepsis-related Organ Failure Assessment) score to describe organ dysfunction/failure. On behalf of the Working Group on Sepsis-Related Problems of the European Society of Intensive Care Medicine. Intensive Care Med 22:707–710

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Charlson ME, Pompei P, Ales KL, MacKenzie CR (1987) A new method of classifying prognostic comorbidity in longitudinal studies: development and validation. J Chronic Dis 40:373–383

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Oken MM, Creech RH, Tormey DC et al (1982) Toxicity and response criteria of the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group. Am J Clin Oncol 5:649–655

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Stekhoven DJ, Bühlmann P (2012) MissForest–non-parametric missing value imputation for mixed-type data. Bioinformatics 28:112–118. doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btr597

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Vesin A, Azoulay E, Ruckly S et al (2013) Reporting and handling missing values in clinical studies in intensive care units. Intensive Care Med 39:1396–1404. doi:10.1007/s00134-013-2949-1

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Pencina MJ, D’Agostino RB, Demler OV (2012) Novel metrics for evaluating improvement in discrimination: net reclassification and integrated discrimination improvement for normal variables and nested models. Stat Med 31:101–113. doi:10.1002/sim.4348

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Chirag R, Parikh HT (2014) Key concepts and limitations of statistical methods for evaluating biomarkers of kidney disease. J Am Soc Nephrol 25:1621

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Steyerberg EW, Vickers AJ, Cook NR et al (2010) Assessing the performance of prediction models: a framework for traditional and novel measures. Epidemiology 21:128–138. doi:10.1097/EDE.0b013e3181c30fb2

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Kerr KF, Wang Z, Janes H et al (2014) Net reclassification indices for evaluating risk prediction instruments: a critical review. Epidemiology 25:114–121. doi:10.1097/EDE.0000000000000018

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. R Core Team (2015) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna

  23. Harrell FE Jr (2001) Regression modeling strategies: with applications to linear models, logistic regression, and survival analysis. Springer-Verlag, New York. doi:10.1007/978-1-4757-3462-1

    Book  Google Scholar 

  24. Wickham H (2009) ggplot2: elegant graphics for data analysis. Springer, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  25. Prigerson HG, Bao Y, Shah MA et al (2015) Chemotherapy use, performance status, and quality of life at the end of life. JAMA Oncol 1:778–784. doi:10.1001/jamaoncol.2015.2378

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Soares M, Toffart A-C, Timsit J-F et al (2014) Intensive care in patients with lung cancer: a multinational study. Ann Oncol 25:1829–1835. doi:10.1093/annonc/mdu234

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Soares M, Caruso P, Silva E et al (2010) Characteristics and outcomes of patients with cancer requiring admission to intensive care units: a prospective multicenter study. Crit Care Med 38:9–15. doi:10.1097/CCM.0b013e3181c0349e

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Cook NR (2007) Use and misuse of the receiver operating characteristic curve in risk prediction. Circulation 115:928–935. doi:10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.106.672402

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Vickers AJ, Cronin AM, Begg CB (2011) One statistical test is sufficient for assessing new predictive markers. BMC Med Res Methodol 11:13. doi:10.1186/1471-2288-11-13

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. Buccheri G, Ferrigno D, Tamburini M (1996) Karnofsky and ECOG performance status scoring in lung cancer: a prospective, longitudinal study of 536 patients from a single institution. Eur J Cancer 32A:1135–1141

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Soares M, Salluh JIF, Spector N, Rocco JR (2005) Characteristics and outcomes of cancer patients requiring mechanical ventilatory support for >24 hrs. Crit Care Med 33:520–526

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Forte DN, Vincent JL, Velasco IT, Park M (2012) Association between education in EOL care and variability in EOL practice: a survey of ICU physicians. Intensive Care Med 38:404–412. doi:10.1007/s00134-011-2400-4

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This study was supported by the National Council for Scientific and Technological Development (CNPq) (Grant No 304240/2014-1), Carlos Chagas Filho Foundation for Research Support of the State of Rio de Janeiro (FAPERJ) and by departmental funds from the D’Or Institute for Research and Education.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Marcio Soares.

Ethics declarations

Conflicts of interest

Dr. Soares and Dr. Salluh are founders and equity shareholders of Epimed Solutions®, which markets the Epimed Monitor System®, a cloud-based software for ICU management and benchmarking. The other authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

We dedicate this work to the memory of our colleague, Dr. Marcelo Lugarinho, who recently passed away.

Take-home message: Impaired performance status at 1 week prior to hospital admission is associated with worse outcomes independently of other markers of baseline health status, such as comorbidities and age. This association is more distinguishable in the mid-range severity of illness scores.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 294 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zampieri, F.G., Bozza, F.A., Moralez, G.M. et al. The effects of performance status one week before hospital admission on the outcomes of critically ill patients. Intensive Care Med 43, 39–47 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00134-016-4563-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00134-016-4563-5

Keywords

Navigation