Abstract
Objective
To investigate the end-of-life decision process in patients managed by emergency physicians in the prehospital setting.
Design
A 40-item retrospective study about most recent end-of-life decision in the prehospital setting.
Patients and participants
1069 physicians (44.9%) from 192 French emergency mobile units.
Measurements and results
A total of 816 (76.3%) physicians reported at least one prehospital end-of-life decision. Conscious patients were involved in 30.7% (54/176) and families in 63.6% of cases. The physician discussed the end-of-life decision with at least one other physician in 56.5% of cases. Perceived imminent death was the most frequently reported criterion (90.1%). Nearly four fifths of patients died before arrival at the hospital (78.8%). Factors independently associated with prehospital withdrawal decision included multiple trauma [odds ratio (OR) 5.7, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.6–19.7], intubation (OR 3.9, 95% CI 2.3–6.5), chronic disease with severe heart failure (OR 2.8, 95% CI 1.5–5.2), acute event with postanoxic coma (OR 2.2, 95% CI 1.3–4.0), emergency physician from a teaching hospital (OR 2.1, 95% CI, 1.3–3.5), male patient (OR 1.9, 95% CI 1.1–3.3), and no sedation (OR 1.9, 95% CI 1.2–3.1). Prehospital withholding decisions were taken for 684 (88%) patients and withdrawing decisions for 12%.
Conclusions
Treatment withholding and withdrawal is common in the prehospital setting in France. These decisions remain highly questionable in this emergency context, in the absence of knowledge of the patient's medical history and of patients' and relatives' clear wishes concerning end-of-life decisions.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Miller FG, Fins JJ (1996) A proposal to restructure hospital care for dying patients. N Engl J Med 334:1740–1742
Truog RD, Cist AF, Brackett SE, Burns JP, Curley MA, Danis M, DeVita MA, Rosenbaum SH, Rothenberg DM, Sprung CL, Webb SA, Wlody GS, Hurford WE (2001) Recommendations for end-of-life care in the intensive care unit: The Ethics Committee of the Society of Critical Care Medicine. Crit Care Med 29:2332–2348
British Medical Association (1999) Withholding and withdrawing life-prolonging medical treatments: guidance for decision making. BMJ Books, London
Recommandations des experts de la Société de Réanimation en Langue Française (2002) Les limitations et arrêts de thérapeutique(s) active(s) en réanimation adulte. Réanimation 11:442–449
Marco CA, Schears RM (2003) Prehospital resuscitation practices: a survey of prehospital providers. J Emerg Med 24:101–106
Ummenhofer W, Scheidegger D (2002) Role of the physician in prehospital management of trauma: European perspective. Curr Opin Crit Care 8:559–565
Le Conte P, Baron D, Trewick D, Touze MD, Longo C, Vial I, Yatim D, Potel G (2004) Withholding and withdrawing life-support therapy in an emergency department: prospective survey. Intensive Care Med 30:2216–2221
Roupie E (1999) La mort aux urgences: enquête prospective préliminaire. In: Actualité en réanimation et urgences. Elsevier, Paris, vol. 281–289
Tardy B, Venet C, Zeni F, Berthet O, Viallon A, Lemaire F, Bertrand JC (2002) Death of terminally ill patients on a stretcher in the emergency department: A French speciality? Intensive Care Med 28:1625–1628
Olsen JC, Buenefe ML, Falco WE (1998) Death in the emergency department. Ann Emerg Med 31:758–765
Iserson KV (1996) Withholding and withdrawing medical treatment: an emergency medicine perspective. Ann Emerg Med 28:51–54
Schears RM, Marco CA, Iserson KV, ACEP Ethics Committee (2004) “Do not attempt resuscitation” (DNAR) in the out-of-hospital setting. Ann Emerg Med 44:68–70
Benitez FL, Pepe PE (2002) Role of the physician in prehospital management of trauma: North American perspective. Curr Opin Crit Care 8:551–558
Lemaire F (2004) A law for end of life care in France? Intensive Care Med 30:2120
Marco CA, Larkin GL, Moskop JC, Derse AR (2000) Determination of “futility” in emergency medicine. Ann Emerg Med 35:604–612
Iserson KV (1991) Foregoing prehospital care: should ambulance staff always resuscitate? J Med Ethics 17:19–24
Lapandry C, Leclercq G, Fleury M (1992) Les décisions d'arrêt de la réanimation en médecine d'urgence pré-hospitalière. Annales médicales de Nancy et de l'Est 31:319–321
Ferrand E, Margenet A, Duvaldestin P, Marty J, French LATASAMU Group (2005) Les modalités de prise de décision d'une limitation ou d'un arrêt thérapeutique en médecine pré hospitalière. Enquête nationale LATASAMU. Réanimation 14:S36
International Consensus on Science (2000) Guidelines 2000 for cardiopulmonary resuscitation and emergency cardiovascular care. Circulation 102:I-12–I-21
Ferrand E, Robert R, Ingrand P, Lemaire F (2001) Withholding and withdrawal of life support in intensive-care units in France: a prospective survey. French LATAREA Group. Lancet 357(9249):9–14
Smedira NG, Evans BH, Grais LS, Cohen NH, Lo B, Cooke M, Schecter WP, Fink C, Epstein-Jaffe E, May C, Luce J (1990) Withholding and withdrawal of life support from the critically ill. N Engl J Med 322:309–315
Schmidt TA, Tolle SW (1990) Emergency physicians' responses to families following patient death. Ann Emerg Med 19:125–128
Cohen S, Sprung C, Sjokvist P, Lippert A, Ricou B, Baras M, Hovilehto S, Maia P, Phelan D, Reinhart K, Werdan K, Bulow HH, Woodcock T (2005) Communication of end-of-life decisions in European intensive care units. Intensive Care Med 31:1215–1221
Roupie E, Santin A, Boulme R, Wartel JS, Lepage E, Lemaire F, Lejonc JL, Montagne O (2000) Patients' preferences concerning medical information and surrogacy: results of a prospective study in a French emergency department. Intensive Care Med 26:52–56
Azoulay E, Pochard F, Chevret S, Adrie C, Bollaert PE, Brun F, Dreyfuss D, Garrouste-Orgeas M, Goldgran-Toledano D, Jourdain M, Wolff M, Le Gall JR, Schlemmer B (2003) Opinions about surrogate designation: a population survey in France. Crit Care Med 31:1711–1714
The SUPPORT Principle Investigators (1995) A controlled trial to improve care for seriously ill hospitalized patients. The study to understand prognoses and preferences for outcomes and risks of treatments (SUPPORT). JAMA 274:1591–1598
Ferrand E, Lemaire F, Regnier B, Kuteifan K, Badet M, Asfar P, Jaber S, Chagnon JL, Renault A, Robert R, Pochard F, Hervé C, Brun-Buisson C, Duvaldestin P (2003) Discrepancies between perceptions by physicians and nursing staff of ICU end-of-life decisions. French RESSENTI Group. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 167:1310–1315
Cook DJ, Guyatt GH, Jaeschke R, Reeve J, Spanier A, King D, Molloy DW, Willan A, Streiner DL (1995) Determinants in Canadian health care workers of the decision to withdraw life support from the critically ill. Canadian Critical Care Trials Group. JAMA 273:703–708
Christakis NA, Lamont EB (2000) Extent and determinants of error in doctors' prognoses in terminally ill patients: prospective cohort study. BMJ 320:469–472
Guru V, Verbeek PR, Morrison LJ (1999) Response of paramedics to terminally ill patients with cardiac arrest: an ethical dilemma. CMAJ 161:1251–1254
Pepe PE, Swor RA, Ornato JP, Racht EM, Blanton DM, Griswell JK, Blackwell T, Dunford J, Turtle Creek Conference II (2001) Resuscitation in the out-of-hospital setting: medical futility criteria for on-scene pronouncement of death. Prehosp Emerg Care 5:79–87
Knaus WA, Draper EA, Wagner DP, Zimmerman JE (1986) An evaluation of outcome from intensive care in major medical centers. Ann Intern Med 104:410–418
Acknowledgements
We are indebted to François Lemaire and Christian Brun-Buisson for helpful advice in preparation of this report, their criticisms and comments on the manuscript. We thank Patricia Jabre for help in selecting the statistical models; Antoinette Wolfe to helpful advice in preparation of this report; Sylvain Fernandez-Curiel for conducting the interviews and for his advice in developing this study design; Sébastien Boyer (Sigillat Institute) for his assistance in analysis of the data; and Claire Vincent-Genod for research assistance. We are grateful for the contribution of all the physicians whose dedicated efforts ensured the high quality of the data. The investigators who participated in the French LATASAMU Group are listed in the electronic supplementary material.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Contributors: E. Ferrand: conception and design, analysis and interpretation of the data, drafting of the article; J. Marty: critical revision of the article for important intellectual content. The authors wrote this article for the French LATASAMU Group
Conflict of interest statement: We declare that we have no conflict of interest
Sources of support: none
This article is discussed in the editorial available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00134-006-0293-4
Electronic supplementary material
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Ferrand, E., Marty, J. Prehospital withholding and withdrawal of life-sustaining treatments. The French LATASAMU Survey. Intensive Care Med 32, 1498–1505 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00134-006-0292-5
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00134-006-0292-5