Skip to main content
Log in

Der Stellenwert der Targeted-Therapie beim Nierenzellkarzinom

Value of targeted therapies for renal cell cancer

  • Leitthema
  • Published:
Der Urologe Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Zusammenfassung

Solitär Zytokin-basierte Behandlungskonzepte sind aufgrund des reduzierten klinischen Ansprechens und der viel versprechenden Daten zur molekularen Targeted-Therapie beim metastasierten Nierenzellkarzinom (NZK) mittlerweile nicht mehr uneingeschränkt als primäre Therapie empfohlen. Seit der Einführung der sog. Targeted-Therapien beim fortgeschrittenen Nierenkarzinom sind eine Vielzahl an mittlerweile randomisierten kontrollierten prospektiven Studien durchgeführt worden. Substantielle und zulassungsrelevante Daten liegen für die Multikinaseinhibitoren Sorafenib (Nexavar®) und Sunitinib (Sutent®), den mTOR-Inhibitor-Temsirolimus (Torisel®) und den monoklonalen Antikörper Bevacizumab (Avastin®) in Kombination mit Interferon-α vor.

In Deutschland sind Sunitinib, Temsirolimus und Bevacizumab als Erstlinientherapie zugelassen, Sorafenib erhielt die Zulassung als Zweitlinientherapie. In klinischen Studien werden derzeit die Fragestellungen nach dem optimalen Zeitpunkt, der neoadjuvanten und adjuvanten Wertigkeit sowie der Art und Sequenz der molekular ausgerichteten Therapie untersucht. Experimentelle Untersuchungen zum besseren Verständnis der Signalwege werden möglichst in Zukunft eine molekulare Präselektion und ggf. individualisierte Therapie beim metastasierten NZK ermöglichen. Ziel der vorliegenden Arbeit ist es, die für die Targeted-Therapeutika in der Behandlung des metastasierten NZK zur Verfügung stehenden klinischen Daten darzustellen und kritisch zu interpretieren.

Abstract

Therapeutic approaches based solely on cytokine are meanwhile no longer recommended without restrictions as the primary therapy for metastatic renal cancer due to the reduced clinical response and the promising available data regarding molecular therapy. Several randomized controlled studies have been performed since the introduction of the so-called targeted therapies for metastatic renal cancer. Substantial data relevant for drug approval are available for the multikinase inhibitors sorafenib (Nexavar®) and sunitinib (Sutent®), the mTOR inhibitor temsirolimus (Torisel®), and the monoclonal antibody bevacizumab (Avastin®) in combination with interferon-α. Sunitinib, temsirolimus, and bevacizumab are approved for first-line treatment, whereas sorafenib was approved for second-line treatment in Germany.

Clinical trials are currently investigating the questions of optimal timing, value of neoadjuvant or adjuvant treatment, form, and sequence of the molecular targeted therapy. Experimental investigations for a better understanding of signaling pathways will preferably allow preselecting patients for an individualized therapy in metastatic renal cell cancer (RCC). The aim of the present paper is to address and to critically discuss the clinical data that are currently available regarding“targeted” therapeutics during the treatment of metastatic RCC.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Literatur

  1. Coppin C, Porzsolt F, Awa A et al. (2005) Immunotherapy for advanced renal cell cancer. Cochrane Database Syst Rev CD001425

  2. Linehan WM, Grubb RL, Coleman JA et al. (2005) The genetic basis of cancer of kidney cancer: implications for gene-specific clinical management. BJU Int 95(2): 2–7

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Merseburger AS, Hennenlotter J, Simon P et al. (2005) Membranous expression and prognostic implications of epidermal growth factor receptor protein in human renal cell cancer. Anticancer Res 25: 1901–1907

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Hennenlotter J, Ohneseit PA, Simon P et al. (2008) PTEN and p27Kip1 are not downregulated in the majority of renal cell carcinomas - implications for Akt activation. Oncol Rep 19: 1141–1147

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Awada A, Hendlisz A, Gil T et al. (2005) Phase I safety and pharmacokinetics of BAY 43–9006 administered for 21 days on/7 days off in patients with advanced, refractory solid tumours. Br J Cancer 92: 1855–1861

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Ahmad T, Eisen T (2004) Kinase inhibition with BAY 43–9006 in renal cell carcinoma. Clin Cancer Res 10: 6388–6392

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Szczylik C, Demkow T, Staehler M et al. (2007) Randomized phase II trial of first-line treatment with sorafenib versus interferon in patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma: Final results. J Clin Oncol 25: 5025

    Google Scholar 

  8. Amato RJ, Harris P, Dalton M et al. (2007) A phase II trial of intra-patient dose-escalated sorafenib in patients (pts) with metastatic renal cell cancer (MRCC). J Clin Oncol 25: 5026

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Escudier B, Eisen T, Stadler WM et al. (2007) Sorafenib in advanced clear-cell renal-cell carcinoma. N Engl J Med 356: 125–134

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Bukowski RM, Eisen T, Szczylik C et al. (2007) Final results of the randomized phase III trial of sorafenib in advanced renal cell carcinoma: Survival and biomarker analysis. J Clin Oncol 25: 5023

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Gondek K, Dhanda R, Simantov R et al. (2006) Health-related quality of life measures in advanced non-small cell lung cancer patients receiving sorafenib. J Clin Oncol 24: 17085

    Google Scholar 

  12. Ratain MJ, Eisen T, Stadler WM et al. (2006) Phase II placebo-controlled randomized discontinuation trial of sorafenib in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma. J Clin Oncol 24: 2505–2512

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Motzer RJ, Michaelson MD, Redman BG et al. (2006) Activity of SU11248, a multitargeted inhibitor of vascular endothelial growth factor receptor and platelet-derived growth factor receptor, in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma. J Clin Oncol 24: 16–24

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Motzer RJ, Rini BI, Bukowski RM et al. (2006) Sunitinib in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma. Jama 295: 2516–2524

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Tamaskar I, Shaheen P, Wood L et al. (2006) Antitumor effects of sorafenib and sunitinib in patients (pts) with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) who had prior therapy with anti-angiogenic agents. J Clin Oncol 24: 4597

    Google Scholar 

  16. Motzer RJ, Hutson TE, Tomczak P et al. (2007) Sunitinib versus interferon alfa in metastatic renal-cell carcinoma. N Engl J Med 356: 115–124

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Patel PH, Chadalavada RS, Chaganti RS, Motzer RJ (2006) Targeting von Hippel-Lindau pathway in renal cell carcinoma. Clin Cancer Res 12: 7215–7220

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Hudes G, Carducci M, Tomczak P et al. (2007) Temsirolimus, interferon alfa or both for advanced renal-cell carcinoma. N Engl J Med 356: 2271–2281

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Amato RJ, Misellati A, Khan M, Chiang S (2006) A phase II trial of RAD001 in patients (Pts) with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (MRCC). J Clin Oncol 24: 4530

    Google Scholar 

  20. Jac J, Giessinger S, Khan M et al. (2007) A phase II trial of RAD001 in patients (Pts) with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (MRCC). J Clin Oncol 25: 5107

    Google Scholar 

  21. Hicklin DJ, Ellis LM (2005) Role of the vascular endothelial growth factor pathway in tumor growth and angiogenesis. J Clin Oncol 23: 1011–1027

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Yang JC, Haworth L, Sherry RM et al. (2003) A randomized trial of bevacizumab, an anti-vascular endothelial growth factor antibody, for metastatic renal cancer. N Engl J Med 349: 427–434

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Escudier B, Pluzanska A, Koralewski P et al. (2007) Bevacizumab plus interferon alfa-2a for treatment of metastatic renal cell carcinoma: a randomised, double-blind phase III trial. Lancet 370: 2103–2111

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Rini SH, Rosenberg JE, Stadler WM et al. (2008) CALGB 90206: A phase III trial of bevacizumab plus interferon-alpha versus interferon-alpha monotherapy in metastatic renal cell carcinoma. 2008 Genitourinary Cancers Symposium, ASCO, Alexandria, VA

  25. Bukowski RM, Kabbinavar FF, Figlin RA et al. (2007) Randomized phase II study of erlotinib combined with bevacizumab compared with bevacizumab alone in metastatic renal cell cancer. J Clin Oncol 25: 4536–4541

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Gordon MS, Manola J, Fairclough D et al. (2004) Low dose interferon-{alpha}2b (IFN) + thalidomide (T) in patients (pts) with previously untreated renal cell cancer (RCC). Improvement in progression-free survival (PFS) but not quality of life (QoL) or overall survival (OS). A phase III study of the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (E2898). J Clin Oncol 22: 4516

    Google Scholar 

  27. Ravaud A, Hawkins R, Gardner JP et al. (2008) Lapatinib versus hormone therapy in patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma: a randomized phase III clinical trial. J Clin Oncol 26: 2285–2291

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Motzer RJ, Bacik J, Murphy BA et al. (2002) Interferon-alfa as a comparative treatment for clinical trials of new therapies against advanced renal cell carcinoma. J Clin Oncol 20: 289–296

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Fossa SD (2000) Interferon in metastatic renal cell carcinoma. Semin Oncol 27: 187–193

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Kuczyk M, Kruck S, Merseburger AS (2007) Efficacy of multikinase inhibitors in the treatment of advanced renal cell cancer. A snapshot. Urologe A 46: 504–510

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Kirchner H, Heinzer H, Roigas J, Overkamp F (2008) Differenzialtherapie beim metastasierenden Nierenzellkarzinom. Onkologe 14: 191–197

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Ljungberg B, Hanbury DC, Kuczyk MA et al. (2007) Renal cell carcinoma guideline. Eur Urol 51: 1502–1510

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Dutcher JP, Szczylik C, Tannir N et al. (2007) Correlation of survival with tumor histology, age, and prognostic risk group for previously untreated patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma (adv RCC) receiving temsirolimus (TEMSR) or interferon-alpha (IFN). J Clin Oncol 25: 5033

    Google Scholar 

  34. Mickisch GH, Garin A, van Poppel H et al. (2001) Radical nephrectomy plus interferon-alfa-based immunotherapy compared with interferon alfa alone in metastatic renal-cell carcinoma: a randomised trial. Lancet 358: 966–970

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Flanigan RC, Salmon SE, Blumenstein BA et al. (2001) Nephrectomy followed by interferon alfa-2b compared with interferon alfa-2b alone for metastatic renal-cell cancer. N Engl J Med 345: 1655–1659

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Interessenkonflikt

Der korrespondierende Autor weist auf folgende Beziehung hin: Advisory Board Mitglied der Firma Bayer und Pfizer. Trotz des möglichen Interessenkonflikts ist der Beitrag unabhängig und produktneutral.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to M.A. Kuczyk.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Merseburger, A., Kuczyk, M. Der Stellenwert der Targeted-Therapie beim Nierenzellkarzinom. Urologe 47, 1303–1310 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00120-008-1746-x

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00120-008-1746-x

Schlüsselwörter

Keywords

Navigation