Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Rationale Antibiotikaverordnung

Mehr Herausforderungen als Erfolge

Rational antibiotic prescribing

Challenges and successes

  • Leitthema
  • Published:
Bundesgesundheitsblatt - Gesundheitsforschung - Gesundheitsschutz Aims and scope

Zusammenfassung

Rationale und intelligente Antibiotikaverordnungsstrategien sind sowohl für den Krankenhausbereich als auch im ambulanten Sektor dringend notwendig. Voraussetzung hierfür ist die Verfügbarkeit von Verbrauchs- und Resistenzdaten sowie einer Infrastruktur und von Personal, die es ermöglichen, diese Daten in Strategien und Bewertungen sowohl auf lokaler und regionaler als auch auf nationaler Ebene umzusetzen. Diese Voraussetzungen sind in Deutschland noch nicht optimal gegeben. Ein großes Problem ist der Mangel an geschultem Personal. Initiativen und Projekte, die teilweise im Rahmen der Deutschen Antibiotika-Resistenz-Strategie gefördert werden, haben hier bereits zu bescheidenen Erfolgen geführt. Insbesondere zu nennen sind GERMAP – ein Antibiotikaverbrauchs- und -resistenzatlas aus dem Human- und Veterinärbereich, eine im Rahmen der internen Qualitätssicherung verbesserte kontinuierliche Antibiotikaverbrauchssurveillance für Akutkrankenhäuser und die sog. ABS-Fortbildungsinitiative mit Netzwerk. Weitere Pläne sind die vermehrte Prüfung der Leitliniencompliance und die Entwicklung und Evaluation geeigneter Qualitätsindikatoren. Mittel- bis längerfristig muss in die Weiterbildung von Infektiologen, Mikrobiologen, Krankenhaushygienikern und Apothekern investiert werden, um eine ausreichende Ausstattung mit geschultem und erfahrenem Personal sicherzustellen.

Abstract

Rational and prudent antibiotic prescribing strategies are important both for the hospital sector as well as for ambulatory medicine. Prerequisites are the availability of antibiotic use and antibiotic resistance data and of infrastructure and trained personnel needed for implementing and evaluating antibiotic policies. Currently, these requirements are not being met sufficiently in Germany. A major challenge in this country is the lack of adequately trained and experienced personnel. On the other hand there are several projects and initiatives supported in part within the national antibiotic resistance control program which have produced some progress and success. One example is GERMAP, the national antibiotic use and resistance atlas covering both human medicine and the veterinary field. Other examples are the recently improved program for continuous hospital antibiotic use, surveillance and feedback and the Antibiotic Stewardship (ABS) training program with establishment of an ABS expert network. Future perspectives include programs for evaluation of practice guideline adherence and the development and evaluation of quality of care indicators. Intermediate and long-term investment is needed in specialty training and certification of a sufficient number of infectious disease physicians, medical microbiologists and infection control doctors/hospital epidemiologists and hospital pharmacists.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Abb. 1
Abb. 2

Literatur

  1. Bean DC, Livermore DM, Papa I, Hall LM (2005) Resistance among Escherichia coli to sulphonamides and other antimicrobials now little used in man. J Antimicrob Chemother 56:962–964

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Dellit TH, Owens RC, McGowan JE et al (2007) IDSA/SHEA guidelines for developing an institutional program to enhance antimicrobial stewardship. Clin Infect Dis 44:159–177

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. McGowan JE (2012) Antimicrobial stewardship—the state of the art in 2011: focus on outcome and methods. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 33:331–337

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Lesprit P, Brun-Buisson C (2008) Hospital antibiotic stewardship. Curr Opin Infect Dis 21:344–349

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. http://ec.europa.eu/dgs/health_consumer/docs/communication_amr_2011_748_en.pdf

  6. http://www.bvl.bund.de/SharedDocs/Downloads/08_PresseInfothek/Germap_2008.pdf?__blob=publicationFile&v=2

  7. http://www.bvl.bund.de/SharedDocs/Downloads/08_PresseInfothek/Germap_2010.pdf;jsessionid=2809109CA9119647D0F59742825D1539.1_cid103?__blob=publicationFile&v=2

  8. Filius PM, Liem TB, Linden PD van der et al (2005) An additional measure for quantifying antibiotic use in hospitals. J Antimicrob Chemother 55:805–808

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Kuster SP, Ruef C, Ledergerber B et al (2008) Quantitative antibiotic use in hospitals: comparison of measurements, literature review, and recommendations for a standard of reporting. Infection 36:549–559

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Vander Stichele RH, Elseviers MM, Ferech M et al (2006) Hospital consumption of antibiotics in 15 European countries: results of the ESAC retrospective data collection (1997–2002). J Antimicrob Chemother 58:159–167

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Mandy B, Koutny E, Cornette C et al (2004) Methodological validation of monitoring indicators of antibiotics use in hospitals. Pharm World Sci 26:90–95

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. With K de, Bestehorn H, Steib-Bauert M, Kern WV (2009) Comparison of defined versus recommended versus prescribed daily doses for measuring hospital antibiotic consumption. Infection 37:349–352

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Muller A, Monnet DL, Talon D et al (2006) Discrepancies between prescribed daily doses and WHO defined daily doses of antibacterials at a university hospital. Br J Clin Pharmacol 61:585–591

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. With K de, Schröder H, Meyer E et al (2004) Antibiotikaanwendung in Deutschland im europäischen Vergleich. Dtsch Med Wochenschr 129:1987–1992

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Maugat S, Thiolet JM, L’Hériteau F et al (2007) Prévalence des traitements antibiotiques dans les établissements de santé, France, 2006. Bull Epidemiol Hebd 51/52:432–437

    Google Scholar 

  16. Zarb P, Goossens H (2011) European Surveillance of Antimicrobial Consumption (ESAC): value of a point-prevalence survey of antimicrobial use across Europe. Drugs 71:745–755

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. http://www.ecdc.europa.eu/en/activities/surveillance/ESAC-Net/publications/Documents/ESAC_Interim_Management_Report_2010–2011.pdf

  18. Goossens H, Ferech M, Vander Stichele R et al (2005) Outpatient antibiotic use in Europe and association with resistance: a cross-national database study. Lancet 365:579–587

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Adriaenssens N, Coenen S, Versporten A et al (2011) European Surveillance of Antimicrobial Consumption (ESAC): quality appraisal of antibiotic use in Europe. J Antimicrob Chemother 66(Suppl 6):71–77

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Kern WV (2011) Antibiotika und Chemotherapeutika. In: Schwabe U, Paffrath D (Hrsg) Arzneiverordnungsreport 2011 – Aktuelle Daten, Kosten, Trends und Kommentare. Springer, Berlin, S 311–338

  21. Glaeske G, Hoffmann F, Koller D et al (2012) Verordnungen bei Kindern. Bertelsmann Stiftung, Gütersloh

  22. Calbo E, Romaní V, Xercavins M et al (2006) Risk factors for community-onset urinary tract infections due to Escherichia coli harbouring extended-spectrum beta-lactamases. J Antimicrob Chemother 57:780–783

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Wilcox MH, Mooney L, Bendall R et al (2008) A case-control study of community-associated Clostridium difficile infection. J Antimicrob Chemother 62:388–396

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Schneider-Lindner V, Quach C, Hanley JA, Suissa S (2011) Antibacterial drugs and the risk of community-associated methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in children. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med 165:1107–1114

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Samore MH, Magill MK, Alder SC et al (2001) High rates of multiple antibiotic resistance in Streptococcus pneumoniae from healthy children living in isolated rural communities: association with cephalosporin use and intrafamilial transmission. Pediatrics 108:856–865

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Kern WV, With K de, Nink K et al (2006) Regional variation in outpatient antibiotic prescribing in Germany. Infection 34:269–273

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Meyer E, Schwab F, Schroeren-Boersch B, Gastmeier P (2008) Surveillance of antibiotic use and bacterial resistance in intensive care units. Bundesgesundheitsbl Gesundheitsforsch Gesundheitsschutz 51:926–935

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Meyer E, Schwab F, Schroeren-Boersch B, Gastmeier P (2010) Dramatic increase of third-generation cephalosporin-resistant E. coli in German intensive care units: secular trends in antibiotic drug use and bacterial resistance, 2001–2008. Crit Care 14:R113

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Abbas S, Ihle P, Heymans L et al (2010) Differences in antibiotic prescribing between general practitioners and pediatricians in Hesse, Germany. Dtsch Med Wochenschr 135:1792–1797

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Altiner A, Knauf A, Moebes J et al (2004) Acute cough: a qualitative analysis of how GPs manage the consultation when patients explicitly or implicitly expect antibiotic prescriptions. Fam Pract 21:500–506

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Altiner A, Brockmann S, Sielk M et al (2007) Reducing antibiotic prescriptions for acute cough by motivating GPs to change their attitudes to communication and empowering patients: a cluster-randomized intervention study. J Antimicrob Chemother 60:638–644

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Adriaenssens N, Coenen S, Tonkin-Crine S et al (2011) ESAC: disease-specific quality indicators for outpatient antibiotic prescribing. BMJ Qual Saf [Epub ahead of print, 2011 Mar 21]

  33. Kleudgen S, Diel F, Burgdorf F et al (2011) AQUIK®: starter set of ambulatory quality indicators developed by the German National Association of Statutory Health Insurance Physicians. Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundheitswes 105:54–63

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Gunten V von, Reymond JP, Boubaker K et al (2009) Antibiotic use: is appropriateness expensive? J Hosp Infect 71:108–111

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Pulcini C, Cua E, Lieutier F et al (2007) Antibiotic misuse: a prospective clinical audit in a French university hospital. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis 26:277–280

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Etienne P, Roger PM, Brofferio P et al (2011) Antimicrobial stewardship program and quality of antibiotic prescriptions. Med Mal Infect 41:608–612

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Cusini A, Rampini SK, Bansal V et al (2010) Different patterns of inappropriate antimicrobial use in surgical and medical units at a tertiary care hospital in Switzerland: a prevalence survey. PLoS One 5:e14011

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Willemsen I, Groenhuijzen A, Bogaers D et al (2007) Appropriateness of antimicrobial therapy measured by repeated prevalence surveys. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 51:864–867

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Zarb P, Amadeo B, Muller A et al (2011) Identification of targets for quality improvement in antimicrobial prescribing: the web-based ESAC point prevalence survey 2009. J Antimicrob Chemother 66:443–449

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Kern WV, With K de (2012) Fortbildungsinitiative Antibiotic Stewardship für Krankenhausärzte und -apotheker. Krankenhaushygiene up2date 7:47–54

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Gastmeier P (2010) Organisation der Infektionsprävention in deutschen Krankenhäusern. Krankenhaushygiene up2date 6:3–7

    Google Scholar 

  42. Kern WV (1999) Infectious diseases as a clinical specialty in Germany—fact or fancy? Infection 19:1–6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Gabler-Sandberger E (1999) Klinische Infektiologie: Strategien und Nutzen des Antibiotika-Managements. Dtsch Arztebl 96:A336–A338

    Google Scholar 

  44. Read RC, Cornaglia G, Kahlmeter G et al (2011) Professional challenges and opportunities in clinical microbiology and infectious diseases in Europe. Lancet Infect Dis 11:408–415

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. http://www.sante.gouv.fr/les-resultats-des-indicateurs-de-qualite-des-soins.html

  46. http://www.sante.gouv.fr/IMG/pdf/Dossier_de_Presse_-_Qualite_et_securite_des_soins.pdf)

  47. Henard S, Rahib D, Léon L et al (2011) Antimicrobial consumption reported through standardized reports on infection control activities, relationship with the ICATB public reporting indicator. Med Mal Infect 41:197–205

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  48. Gastmeier G, Friedrich A, Heesemann J (2010) Fortbildung zum Krankenhaushygieniker in Deutschland. Krankenhaushygiene up2date 5:221–234

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Septimus EJ, Owens RC Jr (2011) Need and potential of antimicrobial stewardship in community hospitals. Clin Infect Dis 53(Suppl 1):8–14

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Danksagung

Die dargestellten eigenen Ergebnissen wurden teilweise in vom BMBF (01KI9951), der EU/DG-SANCO (SI2.325736 und 2003211) und BMG (IIA5-2009-2509FSB340) geförderten Projekten erarbeitet. Wir danken Frau Michaela Steib-Bauert für die Unterstützung beim Datenmanagement und Helmut Schröder sowie Katrin Nink, WIdO, für die langjährige Kooperation.

Interessenkonflikt

Der korrespondierende Autor weist für sich und seine Koautoren auf folgende Beziehungen hin: WVK: Vortragshonorare, Reisebeihilfen und/oder Forschungsbeihilfen von Astellas, AstraZeneca, Bayer, BMG, BMBF, Boehringer, Bundesärztekammer, DFG, Deutsche Gesellschaft für Infektiologie, ESCMID, EU, Gilead, GSK, Janssen, Kassenärztliche Bundesvereinigung, MSD, Paul-Ehrlich-Gesellschaft für Chemotherapie, Pfizer, Siemens, Universität Bremen/Bertelsmann, RKI, Stiftung Warentest. KdW: Vortragshonorare, Reisebeihilfen und/oder Forschungsbeihilfen von ADKA, BMG, Deutsche Gesellschaft für Infektiologie, Paul-Ehrlich-Gesellschaft für Chemotherapie, RKI, Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to W.V. Kern.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kern, W., de With, K. Rationale Antibiotikaverordnung. Bundesgesundheitsbl. 55, 1418–1426 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00103-012-1557-5

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00103-012-1557-5

Schlüsselwörter

Keywords

Navigation