Skip to main content
Log in

Prävention und Kontrolle der Ausbreitung von Vancomycin-resistenten Enterokokken

Ergebnisse eines Workshops der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Hygiene und Mikrobiologie

Prevention and control of the spread of vancomycin-resistant enterococci

Results of a workshop held by the German Society for Hygiene and Microbiology

  • Intensivmedizin
  • Published:
Der Anaesthesist Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Zusammenfassung

Die Inzidenz von Erkrankungen durch Vancomycin-resistente Enterokokken (VRE), insbesondere E. faecium, steigt in verschiedenen deutschen Krankenhäusern, und eine Reihe von Ausbrüchen ist dokumentiert. Auch auf den Intensivstationen des Krankenhaus-Infektions-Surveillance-Systems (KISS) wurden in den Jahren von 2003–2005 ein erheblicher Anstieg der VRE-Inzidenz von 0,5 auf 11,0/10.000 Patienten und ein Anstieg der VRE-assoziierten Letalität beobachtet. Die Gründe für diese Entwicklung sind nicht abschließend geklärt. Da VRE aber schwere Infektionen verursachen können, muss ihre Übertragung durch geeignete Maßnahmen verhindert werden. Der vorliegende Beitrag fasst die in einem Workshop erarbeiteten Empfehlungen der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Hygiene und Mikrobiologie zur Prävention von VRE-Transmissionen bei endemischem und epidemischem Auftreten zusammen. Diskutiert werden die Indikationen zum VRE-Screening, mikrobiologische Diagnostik und allgemeine (Isolierung und Schutzkleidung) sowie zusätzliche Hygienemaßnahmen während nosokomialer Ausbrüche durch VRE.

Abstract

The incidence of vancomycin-resistant enterococci (VRE), especially E. faecium, is increasing in several German hospitals and some facilities have experienced VRE outbreaks. The German National Nosocomial Infection Surveillance System has also noticed a sharp increase in the incidence of nosocomial VRE infections per 10,000 patients from 0.5 in 2003 to 11.0 in 2005 accompanied by a rise in VRE-associated mortality. However, the reasons of this increase remain unknown. As VRE may cause severe nosocomial infections, transmission must be restricted. This article provides the guidelines as defined by the workshop of the German Society for Hygiene and Microbiology for the prevention of VRE transmission in both, endemic and epidemic, settings. The following topics are discussed: indication for VRE screening, microbiological diagnostics, general infection control measures (isolation precautions and use of protective clothing) and additional hygiene measures in the nosocomial VRE outbreak setting.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Abb. 1

Literatur

  1. Arbeitsgemeinschaft Empfindlichkeitsprüfungen und Resistenz der Paul-Ehrlich-Gesellschaft für Chemotherapie e.V. (2004) http://www.p-e-g.org/. Gesehen 29 Nov 2006

  2. Bhorade SM, Christenson J, Pohlman AS et al. (1999) The incidence of and clinical variables associated with vancomycin-resistant enterococcal colonization in mechanically ventilated patients. Chest 115: 1085–1091

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Bonora MG, Solbiati M, Stepan E et al. (2006) Emergence of linezolid resistance in the vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecium multilocus sequence typing C1 epidemic lineage. J Clin Microbiol 44: 1153–1155

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Bonten MJ, Hayden MK, Nathan C et al. (1996) Epidemiology of colonisation of patients and environment with vancomycin-resistant enterococci. Lancet 348: 1615–1619

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Borgmann S, Niklas DM, Klare I et al. (2004) Two episodes of vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecium outbreaks caused by two genetically different clones in a newborn intensive care unit. Int J Hyg Environ Health 207: 386–389

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Boyce JM, Opal SM, Chow JW et al. (1994) Outbreak of multidrug-resistant Enterococcus faecium with transferable vanB class vancomycin resistance. J Clin Microbiol 32: 1148–1153

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Bradley CR, Fraise AP (1996) Heat and chemical resistance of enterococci. J Hosp Infect 34: 191–196

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Brandt C, Jonas D, Schmidt-Hieber M et al. (2006) Kontrolle eines VRE-Ausbruches auf einer hämatologisch-onkologischen Station. 10. Berliner Workshop der Fachgruppe Krankenhaushygiene der DGHM, Berlin

  9. Brisson-Noel A, Dutka-Malen S, Molinas C et al. (1990) Cloning and heterospecific expression of the resistance determinant vanA encoding high-level resistance to glycopeptides in Enterococcus faecium BM4147. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 34: 924–927

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Byers KE, Anglim AM, Anneski CJ et al. (2001) A hospital epidemic of vancomycin-resistant enterococcus: risk factors and control. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 22: 140–147

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Chang S, Sievert DM, Hageman JC et al. (2003) Infection with vancomycin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus containing the vanA resistance gene. N Engl J Med 348: 1342–1347

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Cookson BD, Macrae MB, Barrett SP et al. (2006) Guidelines for the control of glycopeptide-resistant enterococci in hospitals. J Hosp Infect 62: 6–21

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. D’Agata EM, Gautam S, Green WK, Tang YW (2002) High rate of false-negative results of the rectal swab culture method in detection of gastrointestinal colonization with vancomycin-resistant enterococci. Clin Infect Dis 34: 167–172

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Dettenkofer M, Daschner F, Mitarbeiter der VRE Task-Force des Universitätsklinikums Freiburg (2006) Erfolgreiche Kontrolle eines VRE-Ausbruches (Vancomycin-resistente Enterokokken) bei hämatologisch-onkologischen Patienten eines deutschen Universitätsklinikums. 10. Berliner Workshop der Fachgruppe Krankenhaushygiene der DGHM, Berlin

  15. Diaz Granados CA, Zimmer SM, Klein M, Jernigan JA (2005) Comparison of mortality associated with vancomycin-resistant and vancomycin-susceptible enterococcal bloodstream infections: a meta-analysis. Clin Infect Dis 41: 327–333

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Donskey CJ, Chowdhry TK, Hecker MT et al. (2000) Effect of antibiotic therapy on the density of vancomycin-resistant enterococci in the stool of colonized patients. N Engl J Med 343: 1925–1932

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Dutka-Malen S, Molinas C, Arthur M, Courvalin P (1990) The vanA glycopeptide resistance protein is related to D-alanyl-D-alanine ligase cell wall biosynthesis enzymes. Mol Gen Genet 224: 364–372

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. European Antimicrobial Resistance Surveillance System (EARSS) (2006) http://www.rivm.nl/earss/. Cited 29 Nov 2006

  19. Evers S, Sahm DF, Courvalin P (1993) The vanB gene of vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecalis V583 is structurally related to genes encoding D-Ala:D-Ala ligases and glycopeptide-resistance proteins vanA and vanC. Gene 124: 143–144

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Furuno JP, McGregor JC, Harris AD et al. (2006) Identifying groups at high risk for carriage of antibiotic-resistant bacteria. Arch Intern Med 166: 580–585

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Garner JS (1996) Guideline for isolation precautions in hospitals. The Hospital Infection Control Practices Advisory Committee. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 17: 53–80

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Grayson ML, Grabsch EA, Johnson PD et al. (1999) Outcome of a screening program for vancomycin-resistant enterococci in a hospital in Victoria. Med J Aust 171: 133–136

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Grundmann H, Barwolff S, Tami A et al. (2005) How many infections are caused by patient-to-patient transmission in intensive care units? Crit Care Med 33: 946–951

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Halle E, Padberg J, Rosseau S et al. (2004) Linezolid-resistant Enterococcus faecium and Enterococcus faecalis isolated from a septic patient: report of first isolates in Germany. Infection 32: 182–183

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Hayden MK, Bonten MJ, Blom DW et al. (2006) Reduction in acquisition of vancomycin-resistant enterococcus after enforcement of routine environmental cleaning measures. Clin Infect Dis 42: 1552–1560

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Homan WL, Tribe D, Poznanski S et al. (2002) Multilocus sequence typing scheme for Enterococcus faecium. J Clin Microbiol 40: 1963–1971

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Huycke MM, Sahm DF, Gilmore MS (1998) Multiple-drug resistant enterococci: the nature of the problem and an agenda for the future. Emerg Infect Dis 4: 239–249

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Ieven M, Vercauteren E, Descheemaeker P et al. (1999) Comparison of direct plating and broth enrichment culture for the detection of intestinal colonization by glycopeptide-resistant enterococci among hospitalized patients. J Clin Microbiol 37: 1436–1440

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Jochimsen EM, Fish L, Manning K et al. (1999) Control of vancomycin-resistant enterococci at a community hospital: efficacy of patient and staff cohorting. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 20: 106–109

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Kauffman CA (2003) Therapeutic and preventative options for the management of vancomycin-resistant enterococcal infections. J Antimicrob Chemother 51 [Suppl 3]: iii23–30

    Google Scholar 

  31. Kearns AM, Freeman R, Lightfoot NF (1995) Nosocomial enterococci: resistance to heat and sodium hypochlorite. J Hosp Infect 30: 193–199

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Klare I, Konstabel C, Mueller-Bertling S et al. (2005) Spread of ampicillin/vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecium of the epidemic-virulent clonal complex-17 carrying the genes esp and hyl in German hospitals. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis 24: 815–825

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Knoll M, Daeschlein G, Okpara-Hofmann J et al. (2005) Outbreak of vancomycin-resistant enterococci (VRE) in a hematological oncology ward and hygienic preventive measures. A long-term study. Onkologie 28: 187–192

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Kolar M, Vagnerova I, Latal T et al. (2002) The occurrence of vancomycin-resistant enterococci in hematological patients in relation to antibiotic use. New Microbiol 25: 205–212

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Kollef M (2003) Appropriate empirical antibacterial therapy for nosocomial infections: getting it right the first time. Drugs 63: 2157–2168

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Landman D, Quale JM, Oydna E et al. (1996) Comparison of five selective media for identifying fecal carriage of vancomycin-resistant enterococci. J Clin Microbiol 34: 751–752

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Leavis HL, Willems RJ, Top J, Bonten MJ (2006) High-level ciprofloxacin resistance from point mutations in gyrA and parC confined to global hospital-adapted clonal lineage CC17 of Enterococcus faecium. J Clin Microbiol 44: 1059–1064

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Lee TA, Hacek DM, Stroupe KT et al. (2005) Three surveillance strategies for vancomycin-resistant enterococci in hospitalized patients: detection of colonization efficiency and a cost-effectiveness model. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 26: 39–46

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Linden PK, Pasculle AW, Manez R et al. (1996) Differences in outcomes for patients with bacteremia due to vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecium or vancomycin-susceptible E. faecium. Clin Infect Dis 22: 663–670

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Lodise TP, McKinnon PS, Tam VH, Rybak MJ (2002) Clinical outcomes for patients with bacteremia caused by vancomycin-resistant enterococcus in a level 1 trauma center. Clin Infect Dis 34: 922–929

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Martinez JA, Ruthazer R, Hansjosten K et al. (2003) Role of environmental contamination as a risk factor for acquisition of vancomycin-resistant enterococci in patients treated in a medical intensive care unit. Arch Intern Med 163: 1905–1912

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Mattner F, Rüden AS, Mattner L et al. (2007) Thoracic organ transplantation may not increase the risk of bacterial transmission in intensive care units. Int J Hyg Environ Health (in press)

  43. McManus MC (1997) Mechanisms of bacterial resistance to antimicrobial agents. Am J Health Syst Pharm 54: 1420–1433

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Mlangeni D, Bertz H, Bussmann M et al. (2006) Management of an outbreak of vancomycin-resistant enterococci (VRE) in a German university hospital hemato-oncology department. 16th European Congress of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases (ECCMID), Nice

  45. Morrison D, Woodford N, Barrett SP et al. (1999) DNA banding pattern polymorphism in vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecium and criteria for defining strains. J Clin Microbiol 37: 1084–1091

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Mundy LM, Sahm DF, Gilmore M (2000) Relationships between enterococcal virulence and antimicrobial resistance. Clin Microbiol Rev 13: 513–522

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Muto CA, Jernigan JA, Ostrowsky BE et al. (2003) SHEA guideline for preventing nosocomial transmission of multidrug-resistant strains of Staphylococcus aureus and enterococcus. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 24: 362–386

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Neely AN, Maley MP (2000) Survival of enterococci and staphylococci on hospital fabrics and plastic. J Clin Microbiol 38: 724–726

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Pelz RK, Lipsett PA, Swoboda SM et al. (2002) Vancomycin-sensitive and vancomycin-resistant enterococcal infections in the ICU: attributable costs and outcomes. Intensive Care Med 28: 692–697

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Pittet D, Hugonnet S, Harbarth S et al. (2000) Effectiveness of a hospital-wide programme to improve compliance with hand hygiene. Infection Control Programme. Lancet 356: 1307–1312

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Pittet D, Safran E, Harbarth S et al. (1996) Automatic alerts for methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus surveillance and control: role of a hospital information system. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 17: 496–502

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Ray AJ, Hoyen CK, Taub TF et al. (2002) Nosocomial transmission of vancomycin-resistant enterococci from surfaces. JAMA 287: 1400–1401

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Renner P, Peters J (1999) Resistance of enterococci to heat and chemical agents. Zentralbl Hyg Umweltmed 202: 41–50

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Rice LB, Carias L, Rudin S et al. (2003) A potential virulence gene, hylEfm, predominates in Enterococcus faecium of clinical origin. J Infect Dis 187: 508–512

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Salgado CD, Farr BM (2003) Outcomes associated with vancomycin-resistant enterococci: a meta-analysis. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 24: 690–698

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. Saurina G, Landman D, Quale JM (1997) Activity of disinfectants against vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecium. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 18: 345–347

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. Seedat J, Zick G, Klare I et al. (2007) Rapid emergence of resistance to linezolid during linezolid therapy of an Enterococcus faecium infection. Antimicrob Agents Chemother (in press)

  58. Slaughter S, Hayden MK, Nathan C et al. (1996) A comparison of the effect of universal use of gloves and gowns with that of glove use alone on acquisition of vancomycin-resistant enterococci in a medical intensive care unit. Ann Intern Med 125: 448–456

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  59. Stosor V, Peterson LR, Postelnick M, Noskin GA (1998) Enterococcus faecium bacteremia: does vancomycin resistance make a difference? Arch Intern Med 158: 522–527

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  60. Tenorio AR, Badri SM, Sahgal NB et al. (2001) Effectiveness of gloves in the prevention of hand carriage of vancomycin-resistant enterococcus species by health care workers after patient care. Clin Infect Dis 32: 826–829

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  61. Tenover FC, Arbeit RD, Goering RV et al. (1995) Interpreting chromosomal DNA restriction patterns produced by pulsed-field gel electrophoresis: criteria for bacterial strain typing. J Clin Microbiol 33: 2233–2239

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  62. Top J, Schouls LM, Bonten MJ, Willems RJ (2004) Multiple-locus variable-number tandem repeat analysis, a novel typing scheme to study the genetic relatedness and epidemiology of Enterococcus faecium isolates. J Clin Microbiol 42: 4503–4511

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  63. Von Baum H, Dettenkofer M, Fahr AM et al. (2006) Konsensusempfehlung Baden-Württemberg: Umgang mit Patienten mit Glykopepitd-resistenten Enterokokken (GRE)/Vancomycin-resistenten Enterokokken (VRE). Hyg Med 31: 30–32

    Google Scholar 

  64. Webb M, Riley LW, Roberts RB (2001) Cost of hospitalization for and risk factors associated with vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecium infection and colonization. Clin Infect Dis 33: 445–452

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  65. Wendt C, Wiesenthal B, Dietz E, Ruden H (1998) Survival of vancomycin-resistant and vancomycin-susceptible enterococci on dry surfaces. J Clin Microbiol 36: 3734–3736

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  66. Willems RJ, Homan W, Top J et al. (2001) Variant esp gene as a marker of a distinct genetic lineage of vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecium spreading in hospitals. Lancet 357: 853–855

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  67. Zachary KC, Bayne PS, Morrison VJ et al. (2001) Contamination of gowns, gloves, and stethoscopes with vancomycin-resistant enterococci. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 22: 560–564

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  68. Zurenko GE, Ford CW, Hutchinson DK et al. (1997) Oxazolidinone antibacterial agents: development of the clinical candidates eperezolid and linezolid. Expert Opin Investig Drugs 6: 151–158

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Interessenkonflikt

Es besteht kein Interessenkonflikt. Der korrespondierende Autor versichert, dass keine Verbindungen mit einer Firma, deren Produkt in dem Artikel genannt ist, oder einer Firma, die ein Konkurrenzprodukt vertreibt, bestehen. Die Präsentation des Themas ist unabhängig und die Darstellung der Inhalte produktneutral.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to R.-P. Vonberg.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Vonberg, RP., Chaberny, I., Kola, A. et al. Prävention und Kontrolle der Ausbreitung von Vancomycin-resistenten Enterokokken. Anaesthesist 56, 151–157 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00101-006-1123-3

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00101-006-1123-3

Schlüsselwörter

Keywords

Navigation