Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Masquelet technique for open tibia fractures in a military setting

  • Original Article
  • Published:
European Journal of Trauma and Emergency Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

The induced membrane technique (IMT) is a two-stage procedure dedicated to reconstruction of bone defects of the limbs. The objective of this report was to evaluate employment of the IMT for the treatment of open tibia fractures managed in a military trauma center treating both wartime and peacetime injuries.

Methods

A retrospective study was performed among the patients treated via IMT for tibial bone defects related to open fractures between 2009 and 2018. The outcomes recorded included bone union, residual infection, amputation and lower limb function.

Results

During this period, 15 patients with a mean age of 39 years were included for the treatment of Gustilo II (2 cases) or Gustilo IIIB (13 cases) injuries. A mean number of 2.9 debridements were required before stage 1. Flap coverage was associated in 14 cases. The mean interval between stages was 22 weeks. Five patients were re-operated on after stage 1 due to persistent infection. The mean follow-up was 33 months. Bone union was achieved in 13 of the 15 cases (87%) at a mean time of 10.1 months. However, seven additional bone healing procedures were required, including six inter-tibiofibular grafting. Only one late septic recurrence was found. Most patients returned to work in sedentary jobs.

Conclusions

This series is the first to report IMT use in a military setting. The prior eradication of infection constitutes a major challenge in tibial bone defects, especially in high-energy, multi-tissue injuries. An inter-tibiofibular bone reconstruction approach is required when external fixation is chosen.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Masquelet AC, Fitoussi F, Bégué T, Muller GP. Reconstruction des os longs par membrane induite et autogreffe spongieuse. Ann Chir Plast Esthet. 2000;45:346–53.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Masquelet AC. Induced membrane technique: pearls and pitfalls. J Orthop Trauma. 2017;31:S36–S3838.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Masquelet AC, Kishi T, Benko PE. Very long-term results of post-traumatic bone defect reconstruction by the induced membrane technique. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2018. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.otsr.2018.11.012.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Mauffrey C, Hake ME, Chadayammuri V, Masquelet AC. Reconstruction of long bone infections using the induced membrane technique: tips and tricks. J Orthop Trauma. 2016;30:e188–e193193.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Wang X, Luo F, Huang K, Xie Z. Induced membrane technique for the treatment of bone defects due to post-traumatic osteomyelitis. Bone Joint Res. 2016;5:101–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Mülhäusser J, Winkler J, Babst R, Beeres FPJ. Infected tibia defect fractures treated with the Masquelet technique. Medicine. 2017;96:20(e6948).

  7. Siboni R, Joseph E, Blasco L, Barbe C, Bajolet O, Diallo S, Ohl X. Management of septic non-union of the tibia by the induced membrane technique. What factors could improve results? Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2018;104:911–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Apard T, Bigorre N, Cronier P, Duteille F, Bizot P, Massin P. Two-stage reconstruction of post-traumatic tibia bone loss with nailing. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2010;96:549–53.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Stafford PR, Norris BL. Reamer-irrigator-aspirator bone graft and bi Masquelet technique for segmental bone defect nonunions; a review of 25 cases. Injury. 2010;41:S72–S7777.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Karger C, Kishi T, Schneider L, Fitoussi F, Masquelet AC, the French Society of Orthopaedic Surgery, and Traumatology. Treatment of posttraumatic bone defects by the induced membrane technique. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2012;98:92–102.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Taylor BC, Hancock J, Zitzke R, Castaneda J. Treatment of bone loss with the induced membrane technique: techniques and outcomes. J Orthop Trauma. 2015;29:554–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Giannoudis PV, Harwood PJ, Tosounidis T, Kanakaris NK. Restoration of long bone defects treated with the induced membrane technique: protocol and outcomes. Injury. 2016;47:S53–61.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. El-Alfy BS, Ali AM. Management of segmental skeletal defects by the induced membrane technique. Indian J Orthop. 2015;49:643–8.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Morelli I, Drago L, George DA, Gallazzi E, Scarponi S, Romanò CL. Masquelet technique: myth or reality? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Injury. 2016;47:S68–76.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Moris R, Hossain M, Evans A, Pallister I. Induced membrane technique for treating tibial defects gives mixed results. Bone Jt J. 2017;99-B:680–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Rigal S, Mathieu L, de l’Escalopier N. Temporary fixation of limbs and pelvis. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2018;104:S81–S8888.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Gupta G, Ahmad S, Mohd Z, Khan AH, Sherwani K, Khan AQ. Management of traumatic tibial diaphyseal bone defect by “induced-membrane technique”. Indian J Orthop. 2016;50:290–6.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Mathieu L, Mottier F, Bertani A, Danis J, Rongiéras F, Chauvin F. Management of neglected open extremity fractures in low-resource settings: experience of the French Army Medical service in Chad. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2014;100:815–20.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Leininger BE, Rasmussen TE, Smith DL, Jenkins DH, Coppola C. Experience with wound VAC and delayed primary closure of contaminated soft tissue injuries in Iraq. J Trauma. 2006;61:1207–11.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Couch KS, Stojadinovic A. Negative-pressure wound therapy in the military: lessons learned. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2011;127:S117–S13030.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Gustilo RB, Mendoza RM, Williams DN. Problems in the management of type III (severe) open fractures: a new classification of type III open fractures. J Trauma. 1984;24:742–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Murray CK, Hsu JR, Solomkin JS, Keeling JJ, Andersen RC, Ficke JR, et al. Prevention and management of infections associated with combat related extremity injuries. J Trauma. 2008;64:S239–S251251.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Olesen UK, Eckardt H, Bosemark P, Paulsen AW, Dahl B, Hede A. The Masquelet technique of induced membrane for healing bone defects. Injury. 2015;46:S44–S47.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Guthrie HC, Clasper JC, Kay AR, Parker PJ, Limb Trauma and Wounds Working, ADMS. Initial extremity war wound debridement: a multidisciplinary consensus. J R Army Med Corps. 2011;157:170–5.

  25. Granick MS, Chehade M. The evolution of surgical wound management: toward a common language. In: Granick MS, Gamelli RL, editors. Surgical wound management. New York: Informa Healthcare; 2007. p. 17–28.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  26. Nau C, Seebach C, Trumm A, Schaible A, Kontradowitz K, Meier S, et al. Alteration of Masquelet’s induced membrane characteristics by different kinds of antibiotic enriched bone cement in a critical size defect model in the rat’s femur. Injury. 2016;47:325–34.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Bieler D, Franke A, Willms A, Hentsch S, Kollig E. Masquelet technique for reconstruction of osseous defects in a gunshot fracture of the proximal thigh—a case study. Mil Med. 2014;179:e1053–e10581058.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors thank all the surgeons, infectious disease specialists, bacteriologists and pharmacists who took part in the treatment of the patients.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Laurent Mathieu.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest, and no source of funding.

Additional information

The views expressed in this paper are those of the authors and do not reflect the official policy or position of the French Army Health Medical Service.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Mathieu, L., Bilichtin, E., Durand, M. et al. Masquelet technique for open tibia fractures in a military setting. Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg 46, 1099–1105 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00068-019-01217-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00068-019-01217-y

Keywords

Navigation