Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Reamer–Irrigator–Aspirator bone graft harvesting for treatment of segmental bone loss: analysis of defect volume as independent risk factor for failure

  • Original Article
  • Published:
European Journal of Trauma and Emergency Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Introduction

The management of segmental bone loss poses a significant clinical challenge. The purpose of this study was to conduct a retrospective evaluation of our experience in treating segmental bone loss, using Reamer–Irrigator–Aspirator (RIA)-harvested autologous bone graft.

Materials and methods

Between June 2008 and March 2015, 81 patients were treated with the RIA technique for multiple purposes. Inclusion criteria for this study were skeletal mature patients with segmental bone loss, due to acute trauma or non-union, who were treated with RIA-harvested bone graft. Exclusion criteria were skeletal immaturity, pathological fractures and indications for the RIA system other than bone graft harvesting. The primary outcome parameter was clinical and radiographical bone healing.

Results

During the study period, 72 patients met the inclusion criteria. In total, 39 patients (54.2%) were classified as having clinical and radiographical bone healing. Although univariate analysis could not reveal any significant influence of specific risk factors to predict the outcome, there was a trend towards statistical significance for defect volume. Further analysis indeed revealed that smaller defect volumes (< 8 cm3) had a lower risk of non-union.

Conclusions

In approximately half of our study population, the use of the RIA technique for autologous bone graft harvesting in cases of segmental bone loss resulted in a successful outcome with bone healing. Defect size seems to be a critical issue regarding the outcome. Although our results are less promising than previously published, the RIA technique has its place in the treatment algorithm of segmental bone defects.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Tay WH, de Steiger R, Richardson M, Gruen R, Balogh ZJ. Health outcomes of delayed union and nonunion of femoral and tibial shaft fractures. Injury. 2014;45:1653–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Mauffrey C, Barlow BT, Smith W. Management of segmental bone defects. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2015;23:143–53.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Ilizarov GA. Clinical application of the tension-stress effect for limb lengthening. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1990;250:8–26.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Aronson J. Limb-lengthening, skeletal reconstruction, and bone transport with the Ilizarov method. J Bone Jt Surg Am. 1997;79:1243–58.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Stafford PR, Norris BL. Reamer-irrigator-aspirator bone graft and bi Masquelet technique for segmental bone defect nonunions: a review of 25 cases. Injury. 2010;41(Suppl 2):S72–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Paley D, Maar DC. Ilizarov bone transport treatment for tibial defects. J Orthop Trauma. 2000;14:76–85.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Giannoudis PV, Calori GM, Begue T, Schmidmaier G. Bone regeneration strategies: current trends but what the future holds? Injury. 2013;44(Suppl 1):S1–2.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Moghaddam A, Zietzschmann S, Bruckner T, Schmidmaier G. Treatment of atrophic tibia non-unions according to ‘diamond concept’: results of one- and two-step treatment. Injury. 2015;46(Suppl 4):S39–50.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Newman JT, Stahel PF, Smith WR, Resende GV, Hak DJ, Morgan SJ. A new minimally invasive technique for large volume bone graft harvest for treatment of fracture nonunions. Orthopedics. 2008;31:257–61.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Masquelet AC, Fitoussi F, Begue T, Muller GP. Reconstruction of the long bones by the induced membrane and spongy autograft. Ann Chir Plast Esthet. 2000;45:346–53.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Cox G, Jones E, McGonagle D, Giannoudis PV. Reamer-irrigator-aspirator indications and clinical results: a systematic review. Int Orthop. 2011;35:951–6.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. McCall TA, Brokaw DS, Jelen BA, Scheid DK, Scharfenberger AV, Maar DC, et al. Treatment of large segmental bone defects with reamer-irrigator-aspirator bone graft: technique and case series. Orthop Clin North Am. 2010;41:63–73 (table of contents).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Masquelet AC, Begue T. The concept of induced membrane for reconstruction of long bone defects. Orthop Clin North Am. 2010;41:27–37 (table of contents).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Biewener A, Aschenbrenner U, Rammelt S, Grass R, Zwipp H. Impact of helicopter transport and hospital level on mortality of polytrauma patients. J trauma. 2004;56:94–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Marsh JL, Slongo TF, Agel J, Broderick JS, Creevey W, DeCoster TA, et al. Fracture and dislocation classification compendium-2007: orthopaedic Trauma Association classification, database and outcomes committee. J Orthop Trauma. 2007;21:S1–133.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Gustilo RB, Anderson JT. Prevention of infection in the treatment of one thousand and twenty-five open fractures of long bones: retrospective and prospective analyses. J Bone Jt Surg Am. 1976;58:453–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Dellinger EP, Miller SD, Wertz MJ, Grypma M, Droppert B, Anderson PA. Risk of infection after open fracture of the arm or leg. Arch Surg. 1988;123:1320–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Horan TC, Gaynes RP, Martone WJ, Jarvis WR, Emori TG. CDC definitions of nosocomial surgical site infections, 1992: a modification of CDC definitions of surgical wound infections. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol Off J Soc Hosp Epidemiol Am. 1992;13:606–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Metsemakers WJ, Handojo K, Reynders P, Sermon A, Vanderschot P, Nijs S. Individual risk factors for deep infection and compromised fracture healing after intramedullary nailing of tibial shaft fractures: a single centre experience of 480 patients. Injury. 2015;46:740–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Giannoudis PV, Tzioupis C, Green J. Surgical techniques: how I do it? The reamer/irrigator/aspirator (RIA) system. Injury. 2009;40:1231–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Akaike H. New look at statistical-model identification. IEEE Trans Autom Control. 1974;19:716–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Calori GM, Mazza E, Colombo M, Ripamonti C. The use of bone-graft substitutes in large bone defects: any specific needs? Injury. 2011;42(Suppl 2):S56–63.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Karger C, Kishi T, Schneider L, Fitoussi L, Masquelet AC, Masquelet AC, French Society of Orthopaedic Surgery, et al. Treatment of posttraumatic bone defects by the induced membrane technique. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2012;98:97–102.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Qvick LM, Ritter CA, Mutty CE, Rohrbacher BJ, Buyea CM, Anders MJ. Donor site morbidity with reamer-irrigator-aspirator (RIA) use for autogenous bone graft harvesting in a single centre 204 case series. Injury. 2013;44:1263–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Henrich D, Seebach C, Sterlepper E, Tauchmann C, Marzi I, Frank J. RIA reamings and hip aspirate: a comparative evaluation of osteoprogenitor and endothelial progenitor cells. Injury. 2010;41(Suppl 2):S62–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Giannoudis PV, Gudipati S, Harwood P, Kanakaris NK. Long bone non-unions treated with the diamond concept: a case series of 64 patients. Injury. 2015;46(Suppl 8):S48–54.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Han F, Peter L, Lau ET, Thambiah J, Murphy D, Kagda FH. Reamer irrigator aspirator bone graft harvesting: complications and outcomes in an Asian population. Injury. 2015;46:2042–51.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Bhandari M, Guyatt GH, Swiontkowski MF, Tornetta P 3rd, Sprague S, Schemitsch EH. A lack of consensus in the assessment of fracture healing among orthopaedic surgeons. J Orthop Trauma. 2002;16:562–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Giannoudis PV, Einhorn TA, Marsh D. Fracture healing: the diamond concept. Injury. 2007;38(Suppl 4):S3–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Aro HT, Govender S, Patel AD, Hernigou P, Perera de Gregorio A, Popescu GI, et al. Recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein-2: a randomized trial in open tibial fractures treated with reamed nail fixation. J Bone Jt Surg Am. 2011;93:801–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Aho OM, Lehenkari P, Ristiniemi J, Lehtonen S, Risteli J, Leskela HV. The mechanism of action of induced membranes in bone repair. J Bone Jt Surg Am. 2013;95:597–604.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Riegger C, Kropil P, Jungbluth P, Lanzman RS, Miese FR, Hakimi AR, et al. Quantitative assessment of bone defect healing by multidetector CT in a pig model. Skelet Radiol. 2012;41:531–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Seebach E, Holschbach J, Buchta N, Bitsch RG, Kleinschmidt K, Richter W. Mesenchymal stromal cell implantation for stimulation of long bone healing aggravates Staphylococcus aureus induced osteomyelitis. Acta Biomater. 2015;21:165–77.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to W. J. Metsemakers.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

All authors were involved in the study and contributed substantially to the manuscript. Each of the authors is in agreement with the contents of the manuscript. Prof. dr. Willem-Jan Metsemakers and prof. dr. Stefaan Nijs are consultants for DepuySynthes. Prof. dr. Harm Hoekstra is a member of the lecture bureau of DepuySynthes. The department of Trauma Surgery receives an unrestricted research grant from DepuySynthes and is a training centre for DepuySynthes. All authors hereby disclose any financial and personal relationships with other people or organizations that could inappropriately influence this work.

Ethical standards

Given the retrospective nature of the study, the results described did not contain direct research involving Human Participants, nor did it contain research on Animals. The study protocol was conducted following good clinical practice guidelines. The study was approved by the Ethics Committee of the Catholic University Leuven, Belgium.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Metsemakers, W.J., Claes, G., Terryn, P.J. et al. Reamer–Irrigator–Aspirator bone graft harvesting for treatment of segmental bone loss: analysis of defect volume as independent risk factor for failure. Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg 45, 21–29 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00068-017-0821-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00068-017-0821-7

Keywords

Navigation