Skip to main content
Log in

Patient satisfaction during radiation therapy

Correlates and patient suggestions

Patientenzufriedenheit während Strahlentherapie

Korrelierende Faktoren und Verbesserungsvorschläge der Patienten

  • Original article
  • Published:
Strahlentherapie und Onkologie Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Assessing patient satisfaction might help to detect so far unknown patient needs and could contribute to quality assurance within the health care system. We evaluated patient satisfaction and its correlates in a consecutive sample of patients undergoing external beam radiation therapy.

Patients and methods

Patient satisfaction was evaluated within a prospective study with two validated instruments (FPZ, ZUF-8) during the first week of radiation therapy in two university-based radiation oncology departments.

Results

A total of 273 patients could be analyzed. Most patients were irradiated for breast or urogenital cancer. Overall patient satisfaction was high (94.9–98.8%). The most important items for patient satisfaction included the following: “skills of physicians” followed by “physician contact with patients,” “care,” and “information” (Tab. 2). Neither center nor disease entity correlated with global patient satisfaction. Of the patients, 46% reported that they would have preferred additional information prior to the onset of radiotherapy. Patients who sought additional information reported a lower global patient satisfaction (p < 0.001). In multiple linear regression analysis, the need for more information, male gender, and a higher level of education were significant predictors for lower global patient satisfaction (Tab. 6).

Conclusion

During the first week of radiation therapy, patients rate patient–physician interaction and communication on treatment and disease as important factors for their satisfaction. Supplying additional information to subsets of patients prior to starting radiotherapy might help to further improve satisfaction.

Zusammenfassung

Hintergrund

Die Evaluation der Patientenzufriedenheit kann dazu beitragen, bisher nicht bekannte Patientenbedürfnisse aufzudecken und einen Beitrag zur Qualitätssicherung im Gesundheitswesen zu liefern. Wir untersuchten die Patientenzufriedenheit und korrelierende Faktoren in einem perkutan bestrahlten, konsekutiven Patientenkollektiv.

Patienten und Methoden

Die Patientenzufriedenheit wurde innerhalb einer prospektiven Studie mit 2 unterschiedlichen validierten Instrumenten (FPZ, ZUF-8) in 2 Universitätskliniken während der ersten Strahlentherapiewoche untersucht.

Ergebnisse

273 Patienten konnten analysiert werden. Die meisten Patienten wurden wegen eines Mamma- oder eines Prostatakarzinoms behandelt. Insgesamt war die Patientenzufriedenheit hoch (94,9–98,8%). Die wichtigsten Faktoren für die Zufriedenheit waren: „fachliches Können der Ärzte“, „Umgang der Ärzte mit Patienten“, „Betreuung durch Pflegepersonal/Technische Assistenz“ und „Information“ (Tab. 2). Weder das behandelnde Zentrum noch die Grunderkrankung korrelierten mit der globalen Zufriedenheit. 46% der Patienten hätten sich zusätzliche Informationen vor Beginn der Behandlung gewünscht. Patienten mit Wunsch nach mehr Information gaben eine schlechtere Patientenzufriedenheit an (p < 0,001). In der multiplen Regressionsanalyse waren der Wunsch nach mehr Information, männliches Geschlecht und ein höherer Bildungsabschluss signifikante Prädiktoren für eine geringere Patientenzufriedenheit (Tab. 6).

Schlussfolgerung

In der ersten Woche der Strahlentherapie bewerteten Patienten die Interaktion und Kommunikation mit dem behandelnden Arzt als wichtige Faktoren für die Patientenzufriedenheit. Die Bereitstellung zusätzlicher Information für ausgewählte Patientenkollektive könnte die Patientenzufriedenheit weiter verbessern.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  1. Adler J, Paelecke-Habermann Y, Jahn P et al (2009) Patient information in radiation oncology. Radiat Oncol 4:40

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Bhatnagar AK, Land SR, Shogan A et al (2007) What do patients want from their radiation oncologist? Initial results from a prospective trial. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 69:1527–1533

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Bos A, Vosselmann N, Hoogstraten J et al (2005) Patient compliance: a determinant of patient satisfaction. Angle Orthod 75:526–531

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Bredart A, Razavi D, Robertson C et al (2001) Assessment of quality of care in an oncology institute using information on patients’ satisfaction. Oncology 61:120–128

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Brown RF, Hill C, Burant CJ et al (2009) Satisfaction of early breast cancer patients with discussions during initial oncology consultations with a medical oncologist. Psychooncology 18:42–49

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Chen JY, Tao ML, Tisnado D et al (2008) Impact of physician-patient discussions on patient satisfaction. Med Care 46:1157–1162

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Dimoska A, Butow PN, Dent E et al (2008) An examination of the initial cancer consultation of medical and radiation oncologists using the Cancode interaction analysis system. Br J Cancer 98:1508–1514

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Dinapoli N, Parrilla C, Galli J et al (2010) Multidisciplinary approach in the treatment of T1 glottic cancer. The role of patient preference in a homogenous patient population. Strahlenther Onkol 186:607–613

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Dinkel A, Berg P, Pirker C et al (2010) Routine psychosocial distress screening in radiotherapy: implementation and evaluation of a computerised procedure. Br J Cancer 103:1489–1495

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Fitzpatrick R (1998) Scope and measurement of patient satisfaction; measurement of patients’ satisfaction with their care. Royal College of Physicians of London, London, S 1–17

  11. Frances V, Korsch BM, Morris MJ (1969) Gaps in doctor-patient communication. Patients response to medical advice. N Engl J Med 289:535–549

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Gallant MD, Coutts LM (2003) Evaluation of an oncology outpatient orientation program: patient satisfaction and outcomes. Support Care Cancer 11:800–805

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Gioiella ME, Berkman B, Robinson M (1998) Spirituality and quality of life in gynecologic oncology patients. Cancer Pract 6:333–338

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Grady KL, Naftel DC, White-Williams C et al (2005) Predictors of quality of life at 5–6 years after heart transplantation. J Heart Lung Transplant 24:1431–1439

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Halkett GK, Kristjanson LJ, Lobb EA (2008) If we get too close to your bones they’ll go brittle: women’s initial fears about radiotherapy for early breast cancer. Psychooncology 17:877–884

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Henrich G, Herschbach P, Schäfer I (2001) Fragen zur Patientenzufriedenheit (FPZ) – Die Entwicklung eines Fragebogens. Z Med Psychol 10:147–158

    Google Scholar 

  17. Kamo N, Dandapani SV, Miksad RA et al (2011) Evaluation of the SCA instrument for measuring patient satisfaction with cancer care administered via paper or via the Internet. Ann Oncol 22:723–729

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Like R, Zyzanski SJ (1987) Patient satisfaction with the clinical encounter: social psychological determinants. Soc Sci Med 24:351–357

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Linn BS (1982) Burn patients evaluation of emergency department care. Ann Emerg Med 11:235–259

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. McQuellon RP, Wells M, Hoffman S et al (1998) Reducing distress in cancer patients with an orientation program. Psychooncology 7:207–217

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Meredith C, Symonds P, Webster L et al (1996) Information needs of cancer patients in West Scotland: cross sectional survey of patients’ views. BMJ 313:724–726

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Momm F, Lingg S, Xander C et al (2010) The situation of radiation oncology patients’ relatives. A stocktaking. Strahlenther Onkol 186(6):344–350

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Orth JE, Stile WB, Scherwitz L (1987) Patients exposition and provider explanation in routine interviews and hypertensive patients’ blood pressure control. Health Psychol 6:29–42

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Piroth MD, Piroth DM, Pinkawa M et al (2009) Immediate reconstruction with an expander/implant following ablatio mammae because of breast cancer: side effects and cosmetic results after adjuvant chest wall radiotherapy. Strahlenther Onkol 185:669–674

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Pou-Haring H, Volleritsch C, Roth R (2009) Patienteninformation in der Radioonkologie. Zusammenhänge von Informationshandeln und Patientenmerkmalen. Wien Med Wochenschr 159:148–155

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Rainey LC (1985) Effects of preparatory patient education for radiation oncology patients. Cancer 56:1056–1061

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Schäfer C, Dietl B, Putnik K et al (2002) Patient information in radiooncology results of a patient survey. Strahlenther Onkol 178:562–571

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Schmidt J, Lamprecht F, Wittmann WW (1989) Satisfaction with inpatient management. Development of a questionnaire and initial validity studies. Psychother Psychosom Med Psychol 39:248–255

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Sehlen S, Hollenhorst H, Schymura B et al (2001) Krankheitsspezifische Belastungen von Tumorpatienten zu Beginn einer Strahlentherapie. Strahlenther Onkol 170:162–168

    Google Scholar 

  30. Sehlen S, Hollenhorst H, Schymura B et al (2003) Psychosocial stress in cancer patients during and after radiotherapy. Strahlenther Onkol 179:175–180

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Sehlen S, Vordermark D, Schäfer C et al (2009) DEGRO quality of life work group. Job stress and job satisfaction of physicians, radiographers, nurses and physicists working in radiotherapy: a multicenter analysis by the DEGRO quality of life work group. Radiat Oncol 4:6

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Shesser R, Smith M, Adams S (1986) The effectiveness of an organized emergency department follow-up system. Ann Emerg Med 15:911–915

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Thomas R, Deary A, Kaminski E et al (1999) Patients’ preferences for video cassette recorded information: effect of age, sex and ethnic group. Eur J Cancer Care (Engl) 8(2):83–86

    Google Scholar 

  34. Voigtmann K, Köllner V, Einsle F et al (2010) Emotional state of patients in radiotherapy and how they deal with their disorder. Strahlenther Onkol 186(4):229–235

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Welzel G, Hägele V, Wenz F et al (2011) Quality of life outcomes in patients with anal cancer after combined radiochemotherapy. Strahlenther Onkol 187:175–182

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Zissiadis Y, Provis A, Harper E et al (2006) Patient satisfaction in radiation oncology. Australas Radiol 50:455–462

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of interest

The corresponding author states that there are no conflicts of interest.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to H. Geinitz.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Geinitz, H., Marten-Mittag, B., Schäfer, C. et al. Patient satisfaction during radiation therapy. Strahlenther Onkol 188, 492–498 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00066-011-0056-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00066-011-0056-1

Keywords

Schlüsselwörter

Navigation