Skip to main content
Log in

Gefäßgestielte Arteria-peronea-Perforatorlappenplastik

Peroneal artery perforator flap

  • Operative Techniken
  • Published:
Operative Orthopädie und Traumatologie Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Zusammenfassung

Operationsziel

Rekonstruktion von Hautweichteildefekten im Bereich der distalen unteren Extremität durch Verlagerung einer vaskularisierten fasziokutanen Lappenplastik.

Indikation

Defektdeckung im Bereich des mittleren und distalen Drittels des lateralen Unterschenkels, des Malleolus lateralis sowie der Achillessehne.

Kontraindikation

Läsion bzw. Verschluss der Arteria peronea, traumatisierte Hautweichteilverhältnisse im Bereich des lateralen Unterschenkels, tiefe Beinvenenthrombose.

Operationstechnik

Präoperative Lokalisation des dominanten Perforansgefäßes mittels Dopplerultraschall bzw. Duplexsonographie oder (Computertomographie)-Angiographie. Zunächst unilaterale Hautinzision, Darstellen des Perforansgefäßes und Skelettierung bis an die Arteria peronea. Komplette Umschneidung der Lappenplastik, Schonung von sekundären Perforansgefäßen. Bei adäquater Lappenperfusion Transfer der Lappenplastik in den Defekt, entweder mittels Vorschub oder als Propellerlappenplastik. Direkter Verschluss des Entnahmedefekts oder Spalthauttransplantation.

Weiterbehandlung

Hochlagerung der unteren Extremität für 5 Tage. Anschließend vorsichtige elastokompressive Wickelung und orthostatisches Lappentraining mit steigender Intensität. Postoperativ Kompressionstherapie, ggf. Narbentherapie.

Ergebnisse

Bei minimalem funktionellem Entnahmedefekt ausgezeichnete funktionelle und ästhetische Ergebnisse.

Abstract

Objective

Defect reconstruction at the distal lower extremity by transposition of a vascularised fasciocutaneous flap.

Indications

Reconstruction of defects at the lateral aspect of the middle and distal third of the lower leg, the lateral ankle and achilles tendon region.

Contraindications

Lesions or occlusion of the peroneal artery, traumatized skin and soft tissues at the donor site of the flap, deep vein thrombosis of the ipsilateral leg.

Surgical technique

Preoperative localisation of the dominant perforator using Duplex or Doppler ultrasound or CT-angiography. Initially limited skin incision and identification and microsurgical dissection of the dominant perforator up to its origin from the peroneal artery. Completion of skin incision and mobilisation of the flap while the secondary perforans vessels are still preserved. Evaluation of flap perfusion and transfer of the flap into the defect by advancement or 180° rotation as a propeller flap. Closure of the donor site defect by direct suture or skin grafts.

Postoperative management

Elevation of the extremity for 5 days. Elastocompressive garments and orthostatic training with increasing intensity. Standardised postoperative compression therapy and scar therapy if necessary.

Results

Minimal functional donor site defect and optimal functional and aesthetic results.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Abb. 1
Abb. 2
Abb. 3
Abb. 4
Abb. 5
Abb. 6

Literatur

  1. Bach AD, Leffler M, Kneser U et al (2007) The versatility of the distally based peroneus brevis muscle flap in reconstructive surgery of the foot and lower leg. Ann Plast Surg 58:397–404

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Chang SM, Zhang F, Yu GR et al (2004) Modified distally based peroneal artery perforator flap for reconstruction of foot and ankle. Microsurgery 24:430–436

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Dragu A, Bach AD, Kneser U et al (2008) Two easy and simple modifications when using a distally based sural flap to reduce the risk of venous congestion. Plast Reconstr Surg 122:683–684 (author reply 684)

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Giunta RE, Geisweid A, Feller AM (2000) The value of preoperative Doppler sonography for planning free perforator flaps. Plast Reconstr Surg 105:2381–2386

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Heitmann C, Khan FN, Levin LS (2003) Vasculature of the peroneal artery: an anatomic study focused on the perforator vessels. J Reconstr Microsurg 19:157–162

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Hidalgo DA (1989) Fibula free flap: a new method of mandible reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 84:71–79

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Higueras Sune MC, Lopez Ojeda A, Narvaez Garcia JA et al (2011) Use of angioscanning in the surgical planning of perforator flaps in the lower extremities. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 64:1207–1213

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Jakubietz RG, Jakubietz DF, Gruenert JG et al (2010) Reconstruction of soft tissue defects of the Achilles tendon with rotation flaps, pedicled propeller flaps and free perforator flaps. Microsurgery 30:608–613

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Jakubietz RG, Jakubietz MG, Gruenert JG et al (2007) The 180-degree perforator-based propeller flap for soft tissue coverage of the distal, lower extremity: a new method to achieve reliable coverage of the distal lower extremity with a local, fasciocutaneous perforator flap. Ann Plast Surg 59:667–671

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Jones NF, Monstrey S, Gambier BA (1996) Reliability of the fibular osteocutaneous flap for mandibular reconstruction: anatomical and surgical confirmation. Plast Reconstr Surg 97:707–716 (discussion 717–708)

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Kawamura K, Yajima H, Kobata Y et al (2005) Clinical applications of free soleus and peroneal perforator flaps. Plast Reconstr Surg 115:114–119

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Kneser U, Beier JP, Dragu A et al (2011) Transverse cervical artery perforator propeller flap for reconstruction of supraclavicular defects. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 64:952–954

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Koshima I, Soeda S (1989) Inferior epigastric artery skin flaps without rectus abdominis muscle. Br J Plast Surg 42:645–648

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Lee S, Estela CM, Burd A (2001) The lateral distally based adipofascial flap of the lower limb. Br J Plast Surg 54:303–309

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Lu TC, Lin CH, Lin YT et al (2011) Versatility of the pedicled peroneal artery perforator flaps for soft-tissue coverage of the lower leg and foot defects. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 64:386–393

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Lykoudis EG, Koutsouris M, Lykissas MG (2011) Vascular anatomy of the integument of the lateral lower leg: an anatomical study focused on cutaneous perforators and their clinical importance. Plast Reconstr Surg 128:188–198

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Ozalp T, Masquelet AC, Begue TC (2006) Septocutaneous perforators of the peroneal artery relative to the fibula: anatomical basis of the use of pedicled fasciocutaneous flap. Surg Radiol Anat 28:54–58

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Rad AN, Singh NK, Rosson GD (2008) Peroneal artery perforator-based propeller flap reconstruction of the lateral distal lower extremity after tumor extirpation: case report and literature review. Microsurgery 28:663–670

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Saint-Cyr M, Schaverien MV, Rohrich RJ (2009) Perforator flaps: history, controversies, physiology, anatomy, and use in reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 123:132e–145e

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Sananpanich K, Tu YK, Kraisarin J et al (2008) Reconstruction of limb soft-tissue defects: using pedicle perforator flaps with preservation of major vessels, a report of 45 cases. Injury 39(Suppl 4):55–66

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Schaverien M, Saint-Cyr M (2008) Perforators of the lower leg: analysis of perforator locations and clinical application for pedicled perforator flaps. Plast Reconstr Surg 122:161–170

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Schmidt AB, Giessler GA (2010) The muscular and the new osteomuscular composite peroneus brevis flap: experiences from 109 cases. Plast Reconstr Surg 126:924–932

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Schusterman MA, Reece GP, Miller MJ et al (1992) The osteocutaneous free fibula flap: is the skin paddle reliable? Plast Reconstr Surg 90:787–793 (discussion 794–788)

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Taylor GI (1983) The current status of free vascularized bone grafts. Clin Plast Surg 10:185–209

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Wolff KD, Holzle F, Nolte D (2004) Perforator flaps from the lateral lower leg for intraoral reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 113:107–113

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Siewert JR, Stein HJ (Hrsg) (2012) Chirurgie, 9. Aufl. Springer, Berlin (ISBN 978-3-642-11331-4)

Download references

Interessenkonflikt

Der korrespondierende Autor gibt für sich und seine Koautoren an, dass kein Interessenkonflikt besteht.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to U. Kneser.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kneser, U., Beier, J., Dragu, A. et al. Gefäßgestielte Arteria-peronea-Perforatorlappenplastik. Oper Orthop Traumatol 25, 170–175 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00064-012-0200-9

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00064-012-0200-9

Schlüsselwörter

Keywords

Navigation