Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Tungsten Coil Disappearance and SAH Recurrence 12 Years After Endovascular Embolisation


  • Correspondence
  • Published:
Clinical Neuroradiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

References

  1. Bachthaler M, Lenhart M, Paetzel C, Feuerbach S, Link J, Manke C. Corrosion of tungsten coils after peripheral vascular embolisation therapy: influence on outcome and tungsten load. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2004;62(3):380–4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Kampmann C, Brzezinska R, Abidini M, Wenzel A, Wippermann CF, Habermehl P, et al. Biodegradation of tungsten embolisation coils used in children. Pediatr Radiol. 2002;32(12):839–43.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Peuster M, Fink C, von Schnakenburg C, Hausdorf G. Dissolution of tungsten coils does not produce systemic toxicity, but leads to elevated levels of tungsten in the serum and recanalisation of the previously occluded vessel. Cardiol Young. 2002;12(3):229–35.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Weill A, Ducros V, Cognard C, Piotin M, Moret J. Letter. “Corrosion” of tungsten spirals. A disturbing finding. Interv Neuroradiol. 1998;4(4):337–40.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Lalak NJ, Moussa SA. ‘Corrosion’ of tungsten spirale coils in the genitourinary tract. Clin Radiol. 2002;57(4):305–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Xiao FS, Wu ZX, Li YX. Experimental study on corrosion of tungsten coils. Chin J Exp Surg. 2003;20(5):462–3.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Peuster M, Fink C, Wohlsein P, Bruegmann M, Gunther A, Kaese V, et al. Degradation of tungsten coils implanted into the subclavian artery of New Zealand white rabbits is not associated with local or systemic toxicity. Biomaterials. 2003;24(3):393–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Peuster M, Fink C, von Schnakenburg C. Biocompatibility of corroding tungsten coils: in vitro assessment of degradation kinetics and cytotoxicity on human cells. Biomaterials. 2003;24(22):4057–61.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Tan IY, Agid RF, Willinsky RA. Recanalisation rates after endovascular coil embolization in a cohort of matched ruptured and unruptured cerebral aneurysms. Interv Neuroradiol. 2011;17(1):27–35.

    CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Kole MK, Pelz DM, Kalapos P, Lee DH, Gulka IB, Lownie SP. Endovascular coil embolization of intracranial aneurysms: important factors related to rates and outcomes of incomplete occlusion. J Neurosurg. 2005;102(4):607–15. doi:10.3171/jns.2005.102.4.0607.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Mawad ME, Mawad JK, Cartwright J Jr., Gokaslan Z. Long-term histopathologic changes in canine aneurysms embolised with Guglielmi detachable coils. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 1995;16(1):7–13.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Reul J, Weis J, Spetzger U, Konert T, Fricke C, Thron A. Long-term angiographic and histopathologic findings in experimental aneurysms of the carotid bifurcation embolised with platinum and tungsten coils. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 1997;18(1):35–42.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that there are no actual or potential conflicts of interest in relation to this article.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lin Yu-Chang.

Additional information

Advance: The 12-year follow-up is the longest follow-up in published cases.

Implication: Repeat angiography is warranted beyond 10 years. Additionally, it is necessary to re-treat aneurysms in tungsten coil embolised patients because of possible recurrent SAH.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ya-Suo, D., Yu-Chang, L. Tungsten Coil Disappearance and SAH Recurrence 12 Years After Endovascular Embolisation
. Clin Neuroradiol 24, 189–191 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00062-013-0220-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00062-013-0220-3

Keywords

Navigation