Abstract
A general linear model is developed to account for the effects of direct phenotypic imitation and contrast of sibs on one another. Specific predictions from an imitation/contrast model depend upon three assumptions. They are (1) the type of process (imitation or contrast); (2) the stage of the process at the time phenotypes are measured; and (3) sibling constellation variables such as the number, sex composition, and age distribution of a sibling pedigree. For some models, phenotypic variance becomes a polynomial function of the imitation/contrast parameters and the covariances between the genotypes and the environments of sibling pairs. Consequently, phenotypic variances of different types of siblings [e.g., monozygotic (MZ) twins versus dizygotic (DZ) twins versus foster sibs] provide information about imitation or contrast. Thus, standardization of measures prior to analysis may unwittingly hide the statistical information that could detect these effects. The types of data needed to analyze imitation and contrast effects and the potential power of resolving these components of variation are discussed.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Abramovitch, R., Carter, C., and Lando, B. (1979). Sibling interaction in the home.Child Dev. 50:997–1003.
Bandura, A., and Kupers, C. J. (1964). Transmission of patterns of self-reinforcement through modelling.J. Abnorm. Soc. Psychol. 69:1–9.
Bandura, A., and Walters, R. H. (1963).Social Learning and Personality Development, Holt, Rinehart & Winston, New York.
Bandura, A., Grusec, J. E., and Menlove, F. L. (1967). Vicarious extinction of avoidance behavior.J. Personal. Soc. Psychol. 5:16–23.
Carey, G., and Rice, J. (1983). Genetics and personality temperament: Simplicity or complexity?Behav. Genet. 13:43–63.
Cicirelli, V. G. (1982). Sibling influence throughout the lifespan. In Lamb, M. E., and Sutton-Smith, B. (eds.),Sibling Relationships: Their Nature and Significance Across the Lifespan, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, N.J., pp. 267–284.
Clifford, C. A., Fulker, D. W., Gurling, H. M. D., and Murray, R. M. (1981). Preliminary findings from a twin study of alcohol use. In Gedda, L., Parisi, P., and Nance, W. E. (eds.),Twin Research 3: Epidemiological and Clinical Studies, Alan R. Liss, New York, pp. 47–52.
Cloninger, C. R., Rice, J., and Reich, T. (1979). Multifactorial inheritance with cultural transmission and assortative mating. II. A general model of combined polygenic and cultural inheritance.Am. J. Hum. Genet. 31:176–198.
Dunn, J., and Kendrick, C. (1982).Siblings: Love, Envy, and Understanding. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Mass.
Eaves, L. J. (1976). A model for sibling effects in man.Heredity 36:205–214.
Eaves, L. J., Last, K. A., Martin, N. G., and Jinks, J. L. (1977). A progressive approach to non-additivity and genotype-environment covariance in the analysis of human differences.Br. J. Math. Stat. Psychol. 30:1–42.
Eaves, L., Last, K. A., Young, P. A., and Martin N. (1978). Model fitting approaches to the analysis of human behavior.Heredity 41:249–320.
Fulker, D. W., and DeFries, J. C. (1983). Genetic and environmental transmission in the Colorado Adoption Project: Path analysis.Br. J. Math. Stat. Psychol. 36:175–188.
Goldsmith, H. H. (1983). Genetic influences on personality from infancy to adulthood.Child Dev. 54:331–355.
Grusec, J. E., and Mischel, W. (1966). The model's characteristics as determinants of social learning.J. Personal. Soc. Psychol. 4:211–215.
Hopper, J. L., and Mathews, J. D. (1982). Extensions to multivariate normal models for pedigree analysis.Ann. Hum. Genet. 46:373–383.
Hygge, S., and Ohman, A. (1978). Modelling processes in the acquisition of fears: Vicarious electrodermal conditioning to fear-relevant stimuli.J. Personal. Soc. Psychol. 36:271–279.
Jinks, J. L., and Fulker, D. W. (1970). A comparison of the biometrical genetical, MAVA, and classical approaches to the analysis of human behavior.Psychol. Bull. 73:311–349.
Lamb, M. E. (1982). Sibling relationships across the lifespan: An overview and introduction. In Lamb, M. E., and Sutton-Smith, B. (eds.),Sibling Relationships: Their Nature and Significance Across the Lifespan, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, N.J., pp. 1–11.
Lange, K., Westlake, J., and Spence, M. A. (1976). Extensions to pedigree analysis. III. Variance components by the scoring method.Ann. Hum. Genet. Lond. 39:385–491.
Loehlin, J. C. (1978). Heredity-environment analyses of Jenck's IQ correlations.Behav. Genet. 8:415–436.
Loehlin, J. C., and Nichols, R. C. (1976).Heredity, Environment and Personality: A Study of 850 Sets of Twins, University of Texas Press, Austin.
Loehlin, J. C., Horn, J. M., and Willerman, L. (1981). Personality resemblance in adoptive families.Behav. Genet. 11:309–330.
Patterson, G. R. (1984). Siblings: Fellow travelers in coercive family processes.Adv. Study Aggress. 1:173–215.
Plomin, R., DeFries, J. C., and Loehlin, J. C. (1977). Genotype-environment interaction and correlation in the analysis of human behavior.Psychol. Bull. 84:309–322.
Rowe, D. C., and Plomin, R. (1981). The importance of nonshared (E1) environmental influences in behavioral development.Dev. Psychol. 17:517–531.
Scarr, S., and Grajek, S. (1982). Similarities and differences among siblings. In Lamb, M. E., and Sutton-Smith, S. (eds.),Sibling Relationships: Their Nature and Significance Across the Lifespan, Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale, N.J., pp. 357–381.
Vogler, G. P., and Fulker, D. W. (1983). Familial resemblance for educational attainment.Behav. Genet. 13:341–354.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
This work was supported in part by Grants GM-30250, GM-32732, and AG-04954.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Carey, G. Sibling imitation and contrast effects. Behav Genet 16, 319–341 (1986). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01071314
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01071314