Abstract
Background and aims: Gait speed is a commonly-used assessment and outcomes measure in geriatric clinical and research settings. Although relative reliability of usual gait speed has been well studied in community-dwelling older adults, less emphasis has been placed on a measure of absolute reliability (the standard error of measurement [SEM]), and on an associated clinically relevant index of real change in gait speed, minimum detectable change (MDC). The purpose of this study was to quantify measurement error and MDC for usual gait speed over 4 meters in community-dwelling older adults ambulating at intermediate and fast speeds. Methods: Community-dwelling older adults ambulating at intermediate gait speed (IGS), (n=15, mean age 74.2 yrs) and fast gait speed (FGS), (n=15, mean age 72.1) were included in this study. Participants performed two trials of gait speed over a distance of 4 meters. SEM and MDC at the 95% confidence level (MDC95) were computed for the IGS and FGS groups. Results: Mean gait speed was 85.4 cm/s (IGS) and 129.9 cm/s (FGS). Measurement error (<5% of mean gait speed) and minimum detectable change (<13% of mean gait speed) were low in both groups. MDC95 was computed as 10.8 cm/s and 14.4 cm/s for the IGS and FGS groups, respectively. Conclusions: To be considered real change beyond the bounds of measurement error, change in 4-meter gait speed should exceed 10.8 cm/s (for intermediate speed ambulators) or 14.4 cm/s (for fast speed ambulators). Low measurement error in assessing 4-meter gait speed in community-dwelling older adults suggests that gait speed assessed over short distances has excellent reproducibility across trials. Low minimum change values suggest that 4-meter gait speed may be responsive and sensitive to change.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Portney LG, Watkins MP. Foundations of Clinical Research: Applications to Practice, 3rd ed. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall, Inc, 2009.
Shrout PE, Fleiss JL. Intraclass correlations: uses in assessing rater reliability. Psychol Bull 1979; 86: 420–8.
Stratford PW. Getting more from the literature: estimating the standard error of measurement from reliability studies. Physiotherapy Canada 2004; 56: 27–30.
Bland JM, Altman DG. Measurement error. BMJ 1996; 313: 744.
Haley SM, Fragala-Pinkham MA. Interpreting change scores of tests and measures used in physical therapy. Phys Ther 2006; 86: 735–43.
Hollman JH, Beckman BA, Brandt RA, Merriwether EN, Williams RT, Nordrum JT. Minimum detectable change in gait velocity during acute rehabilitation following hip fracture. J Geriatr Phys Ther 2008; 31: 53–6.
Studenski S, Perera S, Wallace D et al. Physical performance measures in the clinical setting. J Am Geriatr Soc 2003; 51: 314–22.
Abellan van Kan G, Rolland Y, Andrieu S et al. Gait speed at usual pace as a predictor of adverse outcomes in community-dwelling older people. An International Academy on Nutrition and Aging (IANA) Task Force. J Nutr Health Aging 2009; 13: 881–9.
Rolland YM, Cesari M, Miller ME, Penninx BW, Atkinson HH, Pahor M. Reliability of the 400-m usual-pace walk test as an assessment of mobility limitation in older adults. J Am Geriatr Soc 2004; 52: 972–6.
Lusardi MM, Pellechia GL, Schulman M. Functional performance in community living older adults. J Geriatr Phys Ther 2003; 26: 14–22.
Fritz S, Lusardi MM. White paper: “Walking speed: the sixth vital sign”. J Geriatr Phys Ther 2009; 32: 2–5.
Perera S, Mody SH, Woodman RC, Studenski SA. Meaningful change and responsiveness in common physical performance measures in older adults. J Am Geriatr Soc 2006; 54: 743–9.
Mangione KK, Craik RL, McCormick AA, et al. Detectable changes in physical performance measures in elderly African Americans. Phys Ther 2010; 90: 921–7.
Walter SD, Eliasziw M, Donner A. Sample size and optimal designs for reliability studies. Stat Med 1998; 17: 101–10.
Wade DT, Vergis E. The Short Orientation-Memory-Concentration Test: a study of its reliability and validity. Clin Rehabil 1999; 13: 164–70.
Gibson MJ, Andres RO, Isaacs B, Radebaugh T, Worm-Petersen J. The prevention of falls in later life. A report of the Kellogg International Work Group on the Prevention of Falls by the Elderly. Dan Med Bull 1987; 34 (Suppl 4): 1–24.
Cromwell RL, Newton RA. Relationship between balance and gait stability in healthy older adults. J Aging Phys Act 2004; 12: 90–100.
Verghese J, Holtzer R, Lipton RB, Wang C. Quantitative gait markers and incident fall risk in older adults. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci 2009; 64: 896–901.
Bland JM, Altman DG. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet 1986; 1: 307–10.
Rubenstein LZ. Falls in older people: epidemiology, risk factors and strategies for prevention. Age Ageing 2006; 35 (Suppl 2): ii37–41.
Wagner JM, Rhodes JA, Patten C. Reproducibility and minimal detectable change of three-dimensional kinematic analysis of reaching tasks in people with hemiparesis after stroke. Phys Ther 2008; 88: 652–63.
Flansbjer UB, Holmback AM, Downham D, Patten C, Lexell J. Reliability of gait performance tests in men and women with hemiparesis after stroke. J Rehabil Med 2005; 37: 75–82.
Paterson KL, Hill KD, Lythgo ND, Maschette W. The reliability of spatiotemporal gait data for young and older women during continuous overground walking. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2008; 89: 2360–5.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Goldberg, A., Schepens, S. Measurement error and minimum detectable change in 4-meter gait speed in older adults. Aging Clin Exp Res 23, 406–412 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03325236
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03325236