Abstract
An ergonomically simple prototype workstation with two 900×1,100-pixel monitors capable of displaying eight full-resolution computed tomography (CT) images in 0.2 seconds, was compared with film for interpretation of computed tomographic images of the chest and abdomen. The hardware platform for this workstation cost less than $11,500 in 1993. A repeated-measures experiment was used to generate average interpretation times of 6.17 minutes for the workstation and 6.03 minutes for the film, including loading and unloading films, with three of the four subjects averaging about a minute longer for each workstation interpretation. All dictated reports were of clinically acceptable accuracy. All radiologists stated that workstations based on this design would be an acceptable clinical tool. However, observation suggested human working-memory strain among infrequent CT readers that could indicate the need for additional training. These data suggest that low-cost workstations can have practical application in interpretation of digital medical images such as CT, with the possibility of small increases in interpretation time.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Arenson RL, van der Voorde F, Stevens JF: Improved financial management of the radiology department with a microcosting system. Radiology 166:255–259, 1988
Beard DV, Parrish D, Stevenson D: A cost analysis of film image management and four PACS based on different network protocols. J Digit Imaging, 3, 108–118, 1990
Pizer SM: Psychovisual issues in the display of medical images, in Hoehne KH (ed): Pictorial Information Systems in Medicine. Berlin, Germany, Springer-Verlag, 1985, pp 235–250
Pizer SM, Beard DV: Medical image workstations: State of science and technology, J Digit Imaging 2:185–193, (1989)
Arenson RL, Chakraborty DP, Seshadri SB, et al: The Digital Imaging Workstation. Radiology 176:303–315, 1990
Foley WD, Jacobson DR, Taylor AJ: et al.: Display of CT studies on a two-screen electronic workstation versus a film panel alternator: Sensitivity and efficiency among radiologists. Radiology 174:769–773, 1990
Johnston RE, Yankaskas BC, Perry JR, et al.: Agreement experiments: A method for quantitatively testing new medical image display approaches. Proceedings of SPIE Medical Imaging IV: PACS System Design and Evaluation 1234:621–630, 1990
Beard DV: Designing a radiology workstation: A focus on navigation during the interpretation task. J Digit Imaging 3:152–163, 1990
Brown JJ, Malchow SC, Totty WG, et al: MR examination of the knee: Interpretation with multiscreen digital workstation vs hardcopy format. Am J Radiol 157:81–85, 1991
Berbaum KS, Franken EA, Honda H, et al: Evaluation of a PACS workstation for assessment of body CT studies. J Comput Assist Tomogr 4:853–858, 1990
Straub WH, Gur D, et al: Primary CT diagnosis of abdominal masses in a PACS environment. Radiology 1:739–743, 1991
Beard DV, Hemminger BM, Denelsbeck KM, et al: A time-motion comparison of several radiology workstation designs and film. SCAR 92 Symposium for Computer Assisted Radiology, Baltimore, MD, June 1992, pp 588–594
Beard DV, Hemminger BM, Perry JR, et al: Singlescreen workstation vs. film alternator for fast CT interpretation. Radiology 187:1–6, 1993
Rumelhard D, Norman D: Analogical processes in learning, In Anderson JR (ed): Cognitive Skills and Their Acquisition. Hillsdale, NJ, Erbaum, 1981, pp 335–359
Young R: The machine inside the machines: User's models of pocket calculators. Int J Man-Machine Stud 15: 51–85, 1981
Beard DV, Johnston RE, Toki O, et al: A study of radiologist viewing multiple computed tomography studies using an eyetracking device. J Digit Imaging 3:230–237, 1990
Hemminger BM: Design of useful and inexpensive radiology workstations. SCAR 92 Symposium for Computer Assisted Radiology, Baltimore, MD, June 1992, pp 615–624
Wendler TH, Grewer R, Monnich KJ, et al: Design considerations for multi modality medical image workstations, in Hohne KH (ed): Pictorial Information Systems In Medicine Berlin, Germany, Springer-Verlag, 1985, pp 401–420
Rogers DC, Johnston RE, Hemminger BM, et al: Effect of ambient light on electronically displayed medical images as measured by luminance-discrimination thresholds. J Opt Soc Am 4:976–983, 1987
Gilbreth FB. Motion Study, New York, NY, Van Nostrand Reinhold, 1911
Card SK, Moran TP, Newell A: The Psychology of Human-Computer Interaction. Hillsdale, NJ Erlbaum, 1983.
Fitts PM: The information capacity of the human motor system in controlling the amplitude of movement. J Exp Psychol 47:381–391, 1954
Meyer DE, Abrams RA, Kornblum S, Wright CE: Optimality in Human Motor Performance: Ideal Control of Rapid Aimed Movements. Psychol Rev 95:340–370, 1988
Beard DV, Hemminger BM, Denelsbeck KM, et al: How many screens does a CT workstation need? J Digit Imaging 7:69–76, 1994
Metz CE: Quantification of failure to demonstrate statistical significance: The usefulness of confidence intervals. Invest Radiol 28:59–63, 1993
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
Supported in part by National Institutes of Health Grant No. R01 CA44060
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Beard, D.V., Hemminger, B.M., Pisano, E.D. et al. Computed tomography interpretations with a low-cost workstation: A timing study. J Digit Imaging 7, 133–139 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03168506
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03168506