Resumen
Antecedentes
El oncogénHER2/neu es un determinante biológico predictivo esencial en el cáncer de mama por su papel como diana terapéutica del trastuzumab. No obstante, no se ha llegado aún a consensuar un método de referencia para su estudio.
Métodos
En este trabajo, hemos aplicado y comparado, sobre 222 carcinomas de mama recopilados prospectivamente, los dos ensayos de uso más frecuente para determinar el estado deHER2/neu: inmunohistoquímica para expresión de la proteína p185 empleando dos anticuerpos monoclonales (CB11 y TAB250) e hibridaciónin situ fluorescente (FISH), utilizando secciones de tejido incluido en parafina.
Resultados
Los resultados demuestran mayor sensibilidad y especificidad con CB11 (62,5% y 93,4% respectivamente) que con TAB250 (40% y 76,4% respectivamente). El estudio inmunohistoquímico con CB11 es adecuado como prueba inicial para predecir el estado del gen, proporciona un alto valor predictivo negativo (95,5%) en los casos de expresión débil o nula y positivo (96,2%) en los tumores con sobreexpresión. Si la expresión inmunohistoquímica es moderada debe considerarse no concluyente y es indispensable el estudio de FISH. También es recomendable aplicar FISH si hay discordancia entre la expresión de p185 y el perfil morfológico y/o molecular tumoral. Finalmente, aunque la tasa de falsos positivos producidos por estudios inmunohistoquímicos es inferior al 5%, debido a la toxicidad y coste de la terapia con trastuzumab es razonable considerar el empleo sistemático de FISH antes de indicar el tratamiento.
Conclusión
En base a nuestros resultados proponemos un protocolo para el estudio molecular deHER2/neu.
Abstract
Background
The HER2/neu proto-oncogene is frequently over-expressed in breast cancer and serves as a biological target for trastuzumab therapy. However, there is no consensus regarding the technical aspects to be used to define HER2/neu status in clinical practice.
Methods
The present study was conducted to address this critical issue by prospectively analysing a large cohort of breast cancer patients (n=222) and using a variety of methods. To define HER2/neu expression, detection of its encoded protein (p185) was performed by comparative immunohistochemical (IHC) analysis using two mouse monoclonal antibodies (mAb CB11 and mAb TAB250). To assess HER2/neu gene amplification, fluorescentin situ hybridisation (FISH) assays with gene-specific probes were conducted. All procedures were applied to de-paraffinised tissue sections of breast tumour samples.
Results
Results showed that mAb CB11 had increased sensitivity and specificity (62.5% and 93.4%, respectively) compared to mAb TAB250 (40% and 76.4%, respectively) in defining HER2/neu amplification. We conclude that HER2/neu measurement by IHC using mAb CB11 is an appropriate strategy which provides a high negative predictive value (95.5%) for HER2/neu amplification in cases with low or undetectable p185 expression. Conversely, mAb CB11 has a high positive predictive value (96.2%) for HER2/neu amplification in cases with p185 overexpression. However, cases with moderate p185 expression need to be considered as inconclusive. In such cases, it is necessary to use FISH measurement to evaluate HER2/neu amplification. It is also advisable to conduct FISH if there is discordance between p185 expression and the histopathology classification of the lesion, or molecular profile of the tumour. Finally, even though the false positive rate of IHC assay is <5%, the toxicity and cost of trastuzumab therapy suggest that FISH be used systematically prior to implementation of treatment.
Conclusion
We suggest the use of a molecular protocol for HER2/neu analysis in this type of tumor.
Bibliografia
Stern DF, Hefferman PA, Weinberg RA. p185, a product of the neu proto-oncogen, is a receptorlike protein associated with tyrosine kinase activity. Mol Cell Biol. 1986;6:1729–40.
Ross JS, Fletcher JA. The HER-2/neu oncogene in breast cancer: prognostic factor, predictive factor, and target for therapy. Stem Cells. 1998;16:413–28.
Dowsett M, Cooke T, Ellis I, et al. Assessment of HER2 status in breast cancer: why, when and how? Eur J Cancer. 2000;36:170–6.
Ross JS, Fletcher JA, Bloom KJ, et al. Targeted Therapy in Breast Cancer: The HER-2/neu Gene and Protein. Mol Cell Proteomics. 2004;3(4):379–98.
Slamon DJ, Godolphin W, Jones LA, et al. Studies of the HER/2-neu proto-oncogen in human breast and ovarian cancer. Science. 1989;244:707–12.
Tedesco KL, Thor AD, Johnson DH, et al. Docetaxel combined with trastuzumab is an active regimen in HER-2 3+ overexpressing and fluorescent in situ hybridization-positive metastatic breast cancer: a multi-institutional phase II trial. J Clin Oncol. 2004;22(6):1071–7.
Vogel CL, Cobleigh MA, Tripathy D, et al. Efficacy and safety of trastuzumab as a single agent in first-line treatment of HER2-overexpressing metastatic breast cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2002;20:719–26.
Cobleigh MA, Vogel CL, Tripathy D, et al. Multinational study of the efficacy and safety of humanized anti-HER2 monoclonal antibody in women who have HER2-overexpressing metastatic breast cancer that has progressed after chemotherapy for metastatic disease. J Clin Oncol. 1999;17:2639–48.
Slamon DJ, Leyland-Jones B, Shak S, et al. Use of chemotherapy plus a monoclonal antibody against HER2 for metastatic breast cancer that overexpresses HER2. N Engl J Med 2001;344:783–92.
Smith IE. Efficacy and safety of Herceptin® in women with metastatic breast cancer: results from pivotal clinical studies. Anticancer Drugs. 2001;12 Supl 4:S3–10.
Yeh IT. Measuring HER-2 in breast cancer. Immunochemistry, FISH, or ELISA? Am J Clin Pathol. 2002;117 Supl:S26–35.
Yaziji H, Gown AM. Accuracy and precision in HER-2/neu testing in breast cancer: are where there yet? Hum Pathol. 2004;35(2):143–6.
Nichols DW, Wolff DJ, Self S, et al. A testing algorithm for determination of HER2 status in patients with breast cancer. Ann Clin Lab Sci. 2002;32:3–11.
Press MF, Slamon DJ, and Flom KJ. Evaluation of HER-2/neu gene amplification and overexpression: Comparison of frequently used assay methods in a molecularly characterized cohort of breast cancer specimens. J Clin Oncol. 2002;20:3095–105.
Bilous M, Dowsett M, Hanna W, et al. Current perspectives on HER2 testing: a review of national testing guidelines. Mod Pathol. 2003;16(2):173–82.
Kaptain S, Tan LK, Chen B. Her-2/neu and breast cancer. [Review]. Diagn Mol Pathol. 2001;10(3):139–52.
Thomson TA, Hayes MM, Spinelli JJ, et al. HER-2/neu in breast cancer: interobserver variability and performance of immunohistochemistry with 4 antibodies compared with fluorescent in situ hybridization. Mod Pathol. 2001; 14(11):1079–86.
Seidman AD, Fornier MN, Esteva EJ, et al. Weekly trastuzumab and paclitaxel therapy for metastatic breast cancer with analysis of efficacy by HER2 immunophenotype and gene amplification. J Clin Oncol. 2001;10(10):2587–95.
De Potter CR, Schelfout A-M. The neu-protein and breast cancer. Virchows Arch. 1995;426:107–15.
Hanna W, Kahn HJ, Trudeau M. Evaluation of HER-2/neu (c-erbB-2) status in breast cancer: from bench to bedside. Mod Pathol. 1999;12:827–34.
Hammock L, Lewis M, Phillips C, Cohen C. Strong HER-2/neu protein overexpression by immunochemistry often does not predict oncogen amplification by fluorescencein situ hybridization. Hum Pathol. 2003;34(10):1043–7.
Acs G, Wang L, Raghunath PN, Salscheider MA, Zhang PJ. Role of different immunostaining patterns in HercepTest interpretation and criteria for gene amplification as determined by fluorescence in situ hybridization. Appl Immunohistochem Mol Morphol. 2003;11(3):222–9.
Yaziji H, Goldstein LC, Barry TS, et al. HER2 testing in breast cancer using parallel tissue-based method. JAMA. 2004;291(16):1972–7.
Rosenthal SI, Depowski PL, Sheehan CE, Ross JS. Comparison of HER-2/neu oncogene amplification detected by fluorescencein situ hybridization in lobular and ductal breast cancer. Appl Immunohistochem Mol Morphol. 2002;10(1):40–6.
Moreno A, Lloveras B, Figueras A, et al. Ductal carcinomain-situ of the breast: Correlation between histologic classification and biologic markers. Mod Pathol 1997;10:1088–92.
Wolber RA, DuPuis BA, Wick MR. Expression of cerb B2 oncoprotein in mammary and extramammary Paget's disease. Am J Clin Pathol 1991;96:243–7.
Masood S, Bui MM. Prognostic and predictive value of HER2/neu oncogene in breast cancer. Microsc Res Tech. 2002;59:102–8.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Artufel, M.V., Valero, A.C., Lladó, R.R. et al. Protocolo de estudio molecular del oncogénHER2/neu en el carcinoma de mama. Clin Transl Oncol 7, 504–511 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02717004
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02717004