Skip to main content
Log in

Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry versus single photon absorptiometry of the radius

  • Clinical Investigations
  • Published:
Calcified Tissue International Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

Radial diaphyseal bone mineral density (BMD) was measured at the standard one-third site by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DEXA) and by125I single photon absorptiometry (SPA) in 70 consecutive subjects, aged 12–86 years, with metabolic disorders of the skeleton. Each patient was measured once by the DEXA (Hologic QDR-1000) instrument and four times by the SPA (Norland 2780) instrument on the same day by one or the other of 2 technicians. The DEXA and SPA measurements were linearly related and highly correlated (r=0.975,P<0.0001) over a range from severe osteopenia to high normal BMD. Ninety-five percent of the variation in the BMD determined by SPA was accounted for by DEXA, so that the BMDSPA=1.035±0.027 (SEM)×BMDDEXA−0.007±0.019 (SEM). This permits continued use of previously accumulated SPA databases. The coefficient of variation for repeat measurements by DEXA was 1.2% and by SPA 1.6%. Examination time by DEXA was 6–7 minutes, about 45% shorter than the corresponding SPA determinations. DEXA is the superior method for evaluation of the radius, as it provides faster and more precise measurements in clinical practice.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Smith DM, Johnston CC, Yu P-L (1972) In vivo measurements of bone mass. Its use in demineralized states such as osteoporosis. JAMA 219:325–329

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Riggs BL, Wahner HW, Dunn WL, Mazess RB, Offord KP, Melton LJ (1981) Differential changes in bone mineral density of the appendicular and axial skeleton with aging. J Clin Invest 67:328–335

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Seeman E, Wahner HW, Offord KP, Kumar R, Johnson WJ, Riggs BL (1982) Differential effects of endocrine dysfunction on the axial and appendicular skeleton: relationship to spinal osteoporosis. J Clin Invest 69:1302–1309

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Parfitt AM, Rao DS, Stanciu J, Villanueva AR, Kleerekoper M, Frame B (1985) Irreversible bone loss in osteomalacia: comparison of radial photon absorptiometry with iliac bone histomorphometry during treatment. J Clin Invest 76:2403–2412

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Mazess RB (1990) Fracture risk: a role for cortical bone. Calcif Tissue Int 47:191–193

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Need AG, Horwitz M, Walker CJ, Chatterton BE, Chapman IC, Nordin BEC (1989) Cross-over study of fat-corrected forearm mineral content during nandrolone decanoate therapy for osteoporosis. Bone 10:3–6

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Wishart J, Horwitz M, Need A, Chatterton B, Nordin BEC (1990) Treatment of postmenopausal hyperparathyroidism with norethindrone. Arch Intern Med 150:1951–1953

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Hassager C, Borg J, Christiansen C (1989) Measurement of the subcutaneous fat in the distal forearm by single photon absorptiometry. Metabolism 38:159–165

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Melton LJ, Eddy DM, Johnston CC (1990) Screening for osteoporosis. Ann Intern Med 112:516–528

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. STATA Reference Manual—release 2 (1989) Computing Resource Center, Los Angeles.

  11. Weinstein RS, Cheek PL (1989) Redistribution of skeletal assets in hemodialysis patients. J Bone Miner Res S1:169

    Google Scholar 

  12. Jensen PS, Orphanoudakis SC, Rauschkolb EN, Baron R, Lang R, Rasmussen H (1980) Assessment of bone mass in the radius by computed tomography. Am J Roentgenol 134:285–292

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Eastell R, Wahner HW, O'Fallon WM, Amadio PC, Melton LJ, Riggs BL (1989) Unequal decrease in bone density of lumbar spine and ultradistal radius in Colles' and vertebral fracture syndromes. J Clin Invest 83:168–174

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Mazess RB, Barden HS, Bisek JP, Hanson HA (1990) Dualenergy x-ray absorptiometry for total-body and regional bone-mineral and soft-tissue composition. Am J Clin Nutr 51:1106–1112

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Weinstein, R.S., New, K.D. & Sappington, L.J. Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry versus single photon absorptiometry of the radius. Calcif Tissue Int 49, 313–316 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02556252

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02556252

Key words

Navigation