Abstract
Background: It has been postulated that one of the rewards of breast cancer screening is the increased likelihood of receiving breast-conserving surgery. The recent wide application of screening mammography has led to an acceleration in the otherwise gradual shift toward smaller, earlier-stage breast cancer that has been occurring since the turn of the century.
Methods: We examined data from patients with pathologically diagnosed breast cancers from all general hospitals in the state of Vermont for use of breast-conserving surgery by era (1975–1984 [n=1,652] versus 1989–1990 [n=683]), method of cancer detection, age, clinical tumor-node-metastases (cTNM) stage, pathologic size, and node status.
Results: Cancers detected by mammography were 2% in 1975–1984 and 36% in 1989–1990. Invasive breast cancers <2 cm maximum pathologic diameter were 34% in 1975–1984 and 50% in 1989–1990 (p<0.001). Statewide, the use of breast-conserving surgery for invasive cancer increased from 8.6% in 1975–1984 to 42.9% in 1989–1990 (p<0.001). In 1989–1990 at the single university hospital, 73% of the patients were treated with breast-conserving surgery versus 22% at the community hospitals (range 0–39%, p<0.001). Differential referral patterns related to stage and age did not appear to explain the variation, because the percentages of cTNM stage I and II patients at the university hospital were similar to those of the community hospitals. Using the university hospital as the standard, we estimated that at least 67% of all patients in the state were eligible for breast-conserving surgery in the years 1975–1984 and 73% in the years 1975–1984, a 6% increase.
Conclusions: Most of the variation in breast-conserving surgery was related to factors other than patient age and stage of disease. Variation was probably related more to local community factors and physician attitudes. At least two-thirds of the women in the state were eligible for breast-conserving surgery even before the wide use of mammography screening.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Fisher B, Bauer M, Margolese R, et al. Five-year results of a randomized clinical trial comparing total mastectomy and segmental mastectomy with or without radiation therapy in the treatment of breast cancer.N Engl J Med 1985;312:665.
Fisher B, Redmond C, Poisson R, et al. Eight-year results of a randomized clinical trial comparing total mastectomy and lumpectomy with or without irradiation in the treatment of breast cancer.N Engl J Med 1989;320:822–8.
Veronesi U, Sacozzi R, Del Vecchio M, et al. Comparing radical mastectomy with quadrantectomy, axillary dissection, and radiotherapy in patients with small cancers of the breast.N Engl J Med 1981;305:6–11.
Veronesi U, Banfi A, Salvador B, et al. Breast conservation is the treatment of choice in small breast cancer: long-term results of a randomized trial.Eur J Cancer 1990;26:668–70.
Sarrazin D, Le MG, Arriagada R, et al. Ten-year results of a randomized trial comparing a conservative treatment to mastectomy in early breast cancer.Radiother Oncol 1989;14:177–84.
von Dongen JA, Bartelink H, Fentiman IS, et al. Randomized clinical trial to assess the value of breast-conserving therapy in stage I and II breast cancer, EORTC 10801 trial. In: Consensus development conference on the treatment of early-stage breast cancer.Journal of the National Cancer Institute monographs. No. 11. (NIH publication no. 90-3187). Washington, D.C.: Government Printing Office, 1992:15–8.
Straus K, Lichter A, Lippman M, et al. Results of the National Cancer Institute early breast cancer trial. In: Consensus development conference on the treatment of early-stage breast cancer.Journal of the National Cancer Institute monographs. No. 11. (NIH publication no. 90-3187). Washington, DC: Government Printing Office, 1992:27–32.
Blicher-Toft M, Rose C, Andersen JA, et al. Danish randomized trial comparing breast conservation therapy with mastectomy: Six years of life-table analysis. In: Consensus development conference on the treatment of early-stage breast cancer.Journal of the National Cancer Institute monographs No. 11. (NIH publication No. 90-3187). Washington, D.C.: Government Printing Office, 1992:19–25.
Hayward J, Caleffi M. The significance of local control in the primary treatment of breast cancer.Arch Surg 1987;122:1244–7.
Farwell MF, Foster RS Jr, Costanza MC. Breast cancer and earlier detection efforts: realized and unrealized impact on stage.Arch Surg 1993;128:510–3.
American Joint Committee for Cancer Staging and End Results Report.Manual for staging of cancer 1978. Chicago: Whiting Press, 1978.
American Joint Committee on Cancer.Manual for staging of cancer, 3rd ed. Philadelphia: JB Lippincott, 1988.
Lazovich DeA, White E, Thomas DB, Moe RE. Underutilization of breast-conserving surgery and radiation therapy among women with stage I or II breast cancer.JAMA 1991;266:3433–8.
Farrow DC, Hunt WC, Samat JM. Geographic variation in the treatment of localized breast cancer.N Engl J Med 1992;326:1097–101.
Nattinger AB, Gottlieb MS, Veum J, et al. Geographic variation in the use of breast-conserving treatment for breast cancer.N Engl J Med 1992;326:1102–7.
Osteen RT, Steele GD Jr, Menck HR, Winchester DP. Regional differences in surgical management of breast cancer.CA 1992;42:39–43.
Osteen RT, Cady B, Chmiel JS, et al. 1991 national survey of carcinoma of the breast by the Commission on Cancer.J Am Coll Surg 1994;178:213–9.
Coleman JS, Katz E, Menzel H. In:Medical innovation — a diffusion study. New York: Bobbs-Merrill, 1966.
Rothman J, Erlick JL, Teresa JG.Promoting innovation and change in organizations and communities — a planning manual. New York: Wiley, 1976.
Rogers EM. In:Diffusion of innovations, 3rd ed. New York: Free Press, 1983.
Tarbox BB, Rockwood JK, Abernathy CM. Are modified radical mastectomies done for T1 breast cancers because of surgeon's advice or patient's choice?Am J Surg 1992;164:417–22.
Veronesi U, Luini A, Del Vecchio M, et al. Radiotherapy and breast-preserving surgery in women with localized cancer of the breast.N Engl J Med 1993;328:1587–91.
Nemoto T, Patel JK, Rosner D, et al. Factors affecting recurrence in lumpectomy without irradiation for breast cancer.Cancer 1991;67:2079–89.
Veronesi U, Volterrani F, Luini A, et al. Quadrantectomy versus lumpectomy for small size breast cancer.Eur J Cancer 1990;26:671–3.
NIH Consensus Development Conference. Treatment of early-stage breast cancer.JAMA 1991;265:391–395.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
This article's contents are solely the responsibility of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official views of the National Cancer Institute.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Foster, R.S., Farwell, M.E. & Costanza, M.C. Breast-conserving surgery for breast cancer: Patterns of care in a geographic region and estimation of potential applicability. Annals of Surgical Oncology 2, 275–280 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02307035
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02307035