Skip to main content
Log in

“Getting even”: Clinical considerations of adaptive and maladaptive vengeance

  • Articles
  • Published:
Clinical Social Work Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This article is intended to acquaint the reader with the concept of vengeance. Conceptualized as the intense, compelling wish or intention to get even, right a wrong, or avenge an injury, vengeance is best understood on a continuum from innocuous retaliatory fantasies/actions on one end of the continuum to meeting out of death and destruction on the other end. This article identifies various manifestations of vengeance, discusses theoretical formulations related to affects in general and vengeance, in particular, and presents a series of case vignettes which highlight the adaptive and maladaptive function of this psychological phenomenon.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abraham, K. (1924). The influence of oral erotism in character formulation.Selected Papers of Karl Abraham New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arlow, J. (1980). The revenge motive in the primal scene.Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association, 28, 519–541.

    Google Scholar 

  • Basch, M.F. (1992). The significance of a theory of affect in psychoanalytic technique. In T. Shapiro and R. Emde (Eds.),Affects: Psychoanalytic Perspective (pp. 291–303). Connecticut: International Universities Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bluestone, H. & Travin, S. (1984). Murder: The ultimate conflict.American Journal of Psychoanalysis, 44(2), 147–167.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boris, J. (1990). Identification with a vengeance.International Journal of Psychoanalysis, 71, 127–140.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brenner, C. (1992). A psychoanalytic theory of affects. In T. Shapiro & R. Emde (Eds.),Affects: Psychoanalytic perspectives (pp. 305–314). Connecticut: International Universities Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Daniels, M. (1969). Pathological vindictiveness and the vindictive character.Psychoanalytic Review, 56(2), 169–196.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fenichel, O. (1945).The psychoanalytic theory of neurosis. New York: Norton Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fromm, E. (1973).The anatomy of human destructiveness. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hackett, G. & Lerner, M. (1987, December 21). Settling a score.Newsweek. p. 43.

  • Horney, K. (1948). The value of vindictiveness.American Journal of Psychoanalysis, 8, 3–12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kernberg, O. (1992). The psychopathology of hatred. In T. Shapiro & R. Emde (Eds.),Affects: Psvchoanalytic Perspectives (p. 209–238). Connecticut: International Universities Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keyishian, J. (1982). Karen Horney on “the value of vindictiveness”.American Journal of Psychoanalysis, 42, 21–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirman, W. (1989). Revenge and accommodation in the family.Modern Psychoanalysis, 14,(1), 89–95.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kohut, H. (1972). Thoughts on narcissism and narcissistic rage.Psychoanalytic Study of the Child, 27, 360–400.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marks, M. (1988). Remorse, revenge and forgiveness.Psychotherapy Patient, 5, 317–330.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marzuk, P., Tardiff, K., & Hirsch, C. (1992) The epidemiology of murder-suicide.The Journal of the American Medical Association, 267, 3179–3183.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nelson, M. (1973). On the utility of spite.Psychoanalytic Review, 60(1), 91–100.

    Google Scholar 

  • Searles, H. (1962). Scorn, disillusionment and adoration in the psychotherapy of schizophrenic.Psychoanalysis and Psychoanalytic Review, 49(3), 142–150.

    Google Scholar 

  • — (1956). The psychodynamics of vengefulness.Psychiatry, 19, 31–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sims, C. (1992, March 1). A commissioner done in by a staff she offended.New York Times, 4, p. 6.

    Google Scholar 

  • Socarides, C. (1966). On vengeance.Journal of American Psychoanalytic Association, 14(2), 356–375.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stein, R. (1991).Psychoanalytic theories of affect. New York: Preaeger Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tomkins, S.S. (1962–1963).Affect, Imagery, Consciousness. 2 vols. New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turow, S. (1987)Presumed Innocent. Farrar, Strauss & Geroux: New York.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Gabriel, M.A., Monaco, G.W. “Getting even”: Clinical considerations of adaptive and maladaptive vengeance. Clin Soc Work J 22, 165–178 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02190472

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02190472

Keywords

Navigation