Abstract
Fifteen patients with pathologically proven focal nodular hyperplasia (FNH) of the liver had abdominal computed tomography (CT) (15) and ultrasound (11). In seven patients, the lesions were incidentally found during gallbladder or renal examination, whereas the other eight had a primary neoplasm and the liver was studied for possible metastasis. In 11 unenhanced CT scans, the ratio of isodense to hypodense lesions was 8 to 3. In 15 contrasten-hanced CT scans, seven were isodense, six were hypodense, and in two, the lesion enhanced (hyperdense). In seven patients a hypodense lesion on unenhanced CT became isodense with contrast injection. Delayed images in three showed the lesions appearing as hypodense in two and displaying a rim of enhancement in one. In one case, unenhanced CT was normal and only enhanced CT showed an area of homogeneous increased density. Ultrasound was done in 11 patients, the lesion was hypoechoic to the liver in five, echogenic in four, and isoechoic in two. Findings of central scar were seen on CT and ultrasound in three cases. Pathologic diagnosis was available in all cases, seven by needle aspiration and eight by surgical resection. In our experience, FNH has many CT and sonographic features that can mimic hemangioma or metastasis. While the presence of a central scar increases the specificity, in a cancer patient, the findings should be interpreted with caution and needle aspiration should be obtained.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Edmondson HA, Peters RL. Tumors of the liver: pathologic features.Semin Roentgenol 1983;18:75–83
Wanless IR, Maudsley C, Adams R. On the pathogenesis of focual nodular hyperplasia of the liver.Hepatology 1985;5:1194–2000
Lee MJ, Saini S, Hamm B, et al. Focal nodular hyperplasia of the liver: MR findings in 35 proved cases.AJR 1991;156:317–320
Goodman ZD. Benign tumors of the liver. In: Okuda K, Ishak KG, eds.Neoplasms of the liver. Tokyo: Springer-Verlag, 1987:105–125
Rogers JV, Mack LA, Freeny PC, Johnson ML, Sones PJ. Hepatic focal nodular hyperplasia: angiography, CT sonography, and scintigraphy.AJR 1981;137:983–990
Brady MS, Coit DG. Focal nodular hyperplasia of the liver,Surg Gynecol Obstet 1990;171:377–381
Ruschenburg I, Droese M. Fine needle aspiration cytology of focal nodular hyperplasia of the liver.Acta Cytol 1989;33:857–860
Yorshikawa J, Matsui O, Masumi K, et al. Delayed enhancement of fibrotic areas in hepatic masses: CT-pathologic correlation.JCAT 1992;162:206–211
Welch TJ, Sheedy PF, Johnson CM, et al. Radiographic characteristics of benign liver tumors: focal nodular hyperplasia and hepatic adenoma.Radiographics 1985;5:673–682
Kudo M, Tomita S, Tochio H, et al. Hepatic focal nodular hyperplasia: specific findings at dynamic contrast-enhanced US with carbon dioxide microbubbles.Radiology 1991;179:377–382
Mathieu D, Bruneton JN, Drouillard J, et al. Hepatic adenomas and focal nodular hyperplasia: dynamic CT study.Radiology 1986;160:53–58
Stephens DH, McKusick MA. Retention of contrast material in focal nodular hyperplasia of the liver on delayed CT: another case.AJR 1990;154:422–423
Friedman A, Lichtenstein J, Goodman Z, Fishman E, Siegelman S, Dachman A. Fibrolamellar hepatocellular carcinoma.Radiology 1985;157:583–587
Rummeny E, Weissleder R, Sironi S, et al. Central scars in primary liver tumors: MR features, specificity, and pathologic correlation.Radiology 1989;171:323–326
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Shirkhoda, A., Farah, M.C., Bernacki, E. et al. Hepatic focal nodular hyperplasia: CT and sonographic spectrum. Abdom Imaging 19, 34–38 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02165858
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02165858