Skip to main content
Log in

Single dose fosfomycin trometamol versus multiple dose nitrofurantoin in pregnant women with bacteriuria: Preliminary results

Einzeldosis Fosfomycin Trometamol im Vergleich zu Nitrofurantoin in Mehrfachdosierung zur Behandlung Schwangerer mit Bakteriurie: Vorläufige Ergebnisse

  • Comparative Trials in Special Population Patients
  • Published:
Infection Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

Pregnancy induces anatomical and physiological changes in the urinary tract. In this condition a bacteriuria, even asymptomatic, may lead more frequently to pyelonephritis. Asymptomatic bacteriuria in pregnant women has therefore got to be treated. According to recent studies, long course antibiotherapy did not prove to be more effective than a single-dose one in the case of non-complicated bacteriuria. Moreover, the maternal and foetal toxicity should be reduced in the latter regimen. In this paper we present the preliminary results of our study comparing a single-dose treatment by fosfomycin trometamol (3 g) and nitrofurantoin (200 mg per day during a week).

Zusammenfassung

In der Schwangerschaft finden anatomische und physiologische Veränderungen in den Harnwegen statt. Selbst eine asymptomatische Bakteriurie führt dadurch häufiger zur Pyelonephritis. Aus diesem Grund muß die asymptomatische Bakteriurie bei Schwangeren behandelt werden. Bei unkomplizierter Bakteriurie haben neuere Studien für eine Langzeitantibiotikatherapie keine höhere Effizienz gezeigt als die Behandlung mit einer Einzeldosis. Darüber hinaus ist anzunehmen, daß die Einmaldosierung die Toxizität bei Mutter und Feten vermindert. Wir stellen in der vorliegenden Arbeit die vorläufigen Ergebnisse unserer Vergleichsstudie mit Fosfomycin Trometamol in Einmaldosis von 3 g und Nitrofurantoin als einwöchige Therapie mit 200 mg täglich vor.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Savage, W. E., Hagg, S. N., Kass, E. H. Demographic and prognostic characteristics of bacteriuria in pregnancy. Medicine 46 (1967) 385–407.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Whalley, P. J. Bacteriuria in pregnancy. In:Kass, E. H. Progress in pyelonephritis, Davis, Philadelphia 1965, pp. 50–57.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Williams, J. D., Reeves, D. S., Brumfitt, W., Condie, A. P. The effects of bacteriuria in pregnancy on maternal health. In:Brumfitt, W., Asscher, A. W. Urinary tract infection, Oxford University Press, London 1973, pp. 103–107.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Shortlife, L. M. D., Stamey, T. A. Urinary infections in adult women. In:Walsh, Gittes, Perlmutter, Stamey Campbell's urology, Saunders, Philadelphia 1986, pp. 797–830.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Ampel, N. M., Zinner, S. H. Bacterial urinary tract infection in pregnancy. In:Francois, B., Perrin, P. (eds.): Urinary infection: insights and prospects, Butterworth, London 1983, pp. 141–160.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Bailey, R. R. Single-dose antibacterial treatment for bacteriuria in pregnancy. Drugs 27 (1984) 183–186.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Masterton, R. G., Evans, D. C., Strike, P. W. Single dose amoxycillin in the treatment of bacteriuria in pregnancy and the puerperium — a controlled clinical trial. Br. J. Obstet. Gynaecol. 92 (1985) 498–505.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Anonymous: Urinary tract infection during pregnancy. Lancet ii (1985) 190–192.

  9. Hankins, D. V., Whalley, J. Acute urinary tract infections in pregnancy. Clin. Obstet. Gynec. 28 (1985) 266–278.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Destrée, D., Guibert, J. Grossesse et infection urinaire. Gaz. Méd. Fr. 92 (1985) 69–72.

    Google Scholar 

  11. McFadyen, I. R. Urinary tract infections in pregnancy. In:Audreucci The kidney in pregnancy, Nijhoff, Den Haag 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Williams, J. D. Bacteriuria in pregnancy. In:Neu, H. C., Williams, I. D. (eds.): New trends in urinary tract infections: Int. Symp. Rome 1987, Karger, Basel 1988, pp. 37–42.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Williams, J. D. Bacteriuria in pregnancy. In:Asscher, A. W., Brumfitt, W. Microbial diseases in nephrology. Wiley, Chichester 1986, pp. 159–182.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Anderson, J. D., Aird, M. Y., Johnson, A. M., Ree, R., Goresky, D., Brumwell, C. A. The use of a single 1-gram dose of amoxycillin for the treatment of acute urinary tract infections. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 5 (1979) 471–483.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Rubin, R. H., Fang, L. S. T., Jones, S. R., Munford, R. S., Slepack, J. M., Varga, P. A. et al: Single-dose amoxycillin therapy for urinary tract infection. Multicenter trial using antibody-coated bacteria localization technique. J. Am. Med. Ass. 244 (1980) 561–564.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Bailey, R. R. Single-dose therapy for cystitis in women. J. Am. Med. Ass. 254 (1985) 1034–1035.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Zinner, S.: Fosfomycin trometamol vs. pipemidic acid in the treatment of bacteriuria in pregnancy. Chemother. 36 (1990) Suppl. 1 (in press).

  18. Ferrari, V., Bonanomi, L., Borgia, M., Lodola, E., Marca, G. A new fosfomycin derivative with much improved bioavailability by oral route. Chemioter. Antimicrob. I (1981) 59–63.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Pavesio, D., Pecco, P., Bianchi, E., Segre, G.: Pharmacokinetics in children of a new fosfomycin derivative with improved bioavailability. In:Ishigami, J. (ed.): Recent advances in chemotherapy. Proc. 14th Int. Congr. Chemotherapy, Kyoto 1985. University of Tokyo 1985, pp. 1911–1912.

  20. Moroni, M., Ventresca, G. P., Bottino, S., Milani, R. A new fosfomycin salt, fosfomycin trometamol (Z 1282): pilot trial of its effectiveness by oral single dose in primary, uncomplicated infections of the urinary tract. In:Ishigami, J. (ed.): Recent advances in chemotherapy. Proc. 14th Int. Congr. Chemotherapy, Kyoto 1985. University of Tokyo Press, Tokyo 1985, pp. 2214–2215.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Neuman, M., Ruffin, F., Fricken, J. Treatment of non-complicated lower urinary tract infections with fosfomycin trometamol, an orally absorbed salt of fosfomycin, in a short course therapy. In:Ishigami, J. (ed.): Recent advances of chemotherapy. Proc. 14th Int. Congr. Chemotherapy, Kyoto 1985. University of Tokyo Press, Tokyo 1985, pp. 2211–2213.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Varese, L. A., Viretto, A., Fontana, P., Cicchetti, V. Z 1282 (fosfomycin trometamol): an antibacterial agent as a single-dose therapy of lower urinary tract infection in children. In:Ishigami, J. (ed.): Recent advances in chemotherapy. Proc. 14th Int. Congr. Chemotherapy, Kyoto 1985, University of Tokyo Press, Tokyo 1985, pp. 2151–2152.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Ragni, N. N., Pivetta, C., Paccagnella, F., Foglia, G., Del Bono, G. P., Fontana, P. Urinary tract in pregnancy. In:Neu, H. C., Williams, I. D. (eds.): New trends in urinary tract infections. Int. Symp., Rome 1987, Karger, Basel 1988, pp. 197–206.

    Google Scholar 

  24. De Cecco, L., Ragni, N. Urinary tract infections in pregnancy: Monuril single-dose treatment versus traditional therapy. Eur. Urol. 13 (Suppl. 1) (1987) 108–113.

    Google Scholar 

  25. McFadyen, I. R., Campbell-Brown, M., Stephenson, M., Seal, D. V. Single-dose treatment of bacteriuria in pregnancy. Eur. Urol. 13 (Suppl. 1) (1987) 22–25.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Thoumsin, H., Aghayan, M. & Lambotte, R. Single dose fosfomycin trometamol versus multiple dose nitrofurantoin in pregnant women with bacteriuria: Preliminary results. Infection 18 (Suppl 2), S94–S97 (1990). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01643435

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01643435

Keywords

Navigation