Skip to main content
Log in

Dual X-ray absorptiometry for the evaluation of bone density from the proximal femur after total hip arthroplasty: Analysis protocols and reproducibility

  • Clinical Investigations
  • Published:
Calcified Tissue International Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

Dual X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) instruments are now able to evaluate bone mineral density (BMD) of bone surrounding metal implants. The assessment of BMD around prosthetic components could provide additional information for the follow-up of total hip arthroplasty (THA). In this study, we evaluated the potential application of DXA in the field of THA. BMD was measured in the proximal femur of both THA and THA-free sides in 14 postmenopausal women 6–18 months after THA. The explored segment was divided into seven zones as proposed by Gruen et al. [18]. The precision error of BMD measurements ranged from 1.8 to 6.8% on the THA side and from 1.1 to 2% to the THA-free side. The reduction of BMD of the THA versus the THA-free side was significant in all seven zones (P < 0.01, t-test for paired data). These results showed significant differences in BMD around femoral components of THA with respect to contralateral healthy side, and demonstrate the sensitivity of DXA for detecting these changes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Harris WH, McCarthy JC, O'Neill DA (1982) Loosening of the femoral component of total hip replacement after plugging the femoral canal. In: Nelson JP (ed) Hip. CV Mosby, St. Louis, p 228

    Google Scholar 

  2. Iannotti JP, Balderston RA, Booth RE, Rothman RH, Cohn JC, Pickens G (1986) Aseptic loosening after total hip arthroplasty. Incidence, clinical significance, and etiology. J Arthroplasty 1:99–103

    Google Scholar 

  3. Engh CA Bobyn JD, Glassman AH (1987) Porous-coated hip replacement: the factors governing bone ingrowth, stress shielding, and clinical results. J Bone Joint Surg 69-B:45–55

    Google Scholar 

  4. Engh CA, Bobyn JD (1988) The influence of stem size and extent of porous coating on femoral bone resorption after primary cementless hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop 231:7–28

    Google Scholar 

  5. Engh CA, Bobyn JP, Matthews JG (1984) Biologic fixation of a modified Moore prosthesis. In: The hip. Pro 12th Open Scientific Meeting of the Hip Society. CV Mosby, St. Louis, pp 95–110

    Google Scholar 

  6. Callaghan JJ, Salvati EA, Pellicci PM, Wilson PD, Ranawat CS (1985) Results of revision for mechanical failure after cemented total hip replacement, 1979 to 1982. J Bone Joint Surg 67A:1074–1079

    Google Scholar 

  7. Stulberg BN, Bauer TW, Watson JT, Richmond B (1989) Bone quality. Clin Orthop 240:200–205

    Google Scholar 

  8. Dorr LD, Arnala I, Faugere MC, Malluche HH (1990) Five-year postoperative results of cemented femoral arthroplasty in patients with systemic bone disease. Clin Orthop 259:114

    Google Scholar 

  9. Ortolani S, Trevisan C, Montesano A, Gandolini G, Bianchi ML, Caraceni MP, Ulivieri FM (1990) Comparison between 153-Gd and X-ray dual photon absorptiometry. Ital J Miner Electrolyte Metab 4(1):37–42

    Google Scholar 

  10. Mazess RB, Barden HS (1988) Measurement of bone by dualphoton absorptiometry (DPA) and dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DEXA). Ann Chirur Gynaecol 77:197–203

    Google Scholar 

  11. Wahner HW, Dunn WL, Brown ML, Morin RL, Riggs BL (1988) Comparison of dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry for bone mineral measurements of the lumbar spine. Mayo Clin Proc 63:1075–1084

    Google Scholar 

  12. Mazess RB, Barden HS (1988) Bone densitometry for diagnosis and monitoring osteoporosis. Proc Soc Exp Biol Med 191:261–271

    Google Scholar 

  13. Wahner HW, Dunn WL, Riggs BL (1988) Bone densitometry and clinical decision-making in osteoporosis (editorial). Ann Intern Med 108:293–295

    Google Scholar 

  14. Kiratli BJ, Heiner JP, McBeath AA, Wilson MA (1992) Determination of bone mineral density by dual X-ray absorptiometry in patients with uncemented total hip arthroplasty. J Orthop Res 10:836–844

    Google Scholar 

  15. McCarthy CK, Steinberg GG, Agren M, Leahey D, Wyman E, Baran DT (1991) Quantifying bone loss from the proximal femur after total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg 73-B:774–778

    Google Scholar 

  16. Engh CA, McGovern TF, Bobyn JD, Harris WH (1992) A quantitative evaluation of periprosthetic bone remodeling after cementless total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg 74-A:1009–1020

    Google Scholar 

  17. Richmond BJ, Eberle RW, Stulberg BN, Deal CL (1991) DEXA measurement of peri-prosthetic bone mineral density in total hip arthroplasty. Osteoporosis Int 1(3):191

    Google Scholar 

  18. Gruen TA, McNeice GM, Amstutz HC (1979) “Modes of failure” of cemented stem-type femoral components: a radiographic analysis of loosening. Clin Orthop 141:17–27

    Google Scholar 

  19. Burke DW, Davies JP, O'Connor DO, Harris HW (1984) Experimental strain-analysis in the femoral mantle of simulated total hip arthroplasties. Orthop Trans 9:296–302

    Google Scholar 

  20. Crowninshield RD, Tolbert JR (1983) Cement strain measurement surrounding loose and well-fixed femoral component stems. J Biomed Mat Res 17:819–823

    Google Scholar 

  21. Oh I, Harris WH (1978) Proximal strain distribution in the loaded femur: an in vitro comparison of the distributions in the intact femur and after insertion of different hip replacement femoral components. J Bone Joint Surg 60A:75–83

    Google Scholar 

  22. Crowninshield RD, Brand RA, Johnston RC, Milroy JC (1980) An analysis of femoral component stem design in total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg 62A:68–75

    Google Scholar 

  23. Maloney WJ, Jasty M, Burke DW, O'Connor DO, Zalenski EB, Bragdon C, Harris WH (1989) Biomechanical and histologic investigation of cemented total hip arthroplasty: a study of au topsy-retrieved femurs after in vivo cycling. Clin Orthop 249:129–140

    Google Scholar 

  24. Carter DR, Hayes WC (1976) Bone compressive strength: the influence of density and strain rate. Science 194:1174–1176

    Google Scholar 

  25. Carter DR, Hayes WC (1977) The compressive behavior of bone as a two phase porous structure. J Bone Joint Surg 59A:954–962

    Google Scholar 

  26. Wilson CR, Fogelmann I, Blake GM, Rodin A (1991) The effect of positioning on dual energy X-ray bone densitometry of the proximal femur. Bone Miner 13(1):69–76

    Google Scholar 

  27. Engh CA, Massin P, Suthers K (1990) Roentgenographic assessment of the biologic fixation of porous-surfaced femoral components. Clin Orthop 257:107–128

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Trevisan, C., Bigoni, M., Cherubini, R. et al. Dual X-ray absorptiometry for the evaluation of bone density from the proximal femur after total hip arthroplasty: Analysis protocols and reproducibility. Calcif Tissue Int 53, 158–161 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01321831

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01321831

Key words

Navigation