Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

An evaluation of Hospital Emergency Department (HED) adherence to universal precautions

  • Articles
  • Published:
Journal of Medical Systems Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A longitudinal cross sectional study of Hospital Emergency Department (HED) procedures over a nine month period was conducted. A total of 1,541 procedures were observed on 56 randomly selected 8-h work shifts. Shifts were distributed: 34% day shift; 34% evening shift; and 32% on the night shift. Observations on the evening shift were oversampled to capture an adequate number of trauma patients. Observations were distributed: 33% day shift; 39% evening shift; and 28% on the night shift. Measurements included: type of procedure; adherence to specific barrier technique, i.e., use of gloves, gowns, masks, and eye protection; and occurrence of adverse exposure. Ten types of HED procedures were documented and analyzed. Computerized tracking of study observations established periodic rates of HED health care worker (HCW) adherence to universal precautions. These data are important for internal quality control/assurance programs and rate comparisons within and across institutions over time. The longitudinal evaluation of the database revealed that glove compliance increased over the period of the study and adverse exposure decreased. Conducting ongoing or periodic observational studies of this kind are important and necessary in order to gauge HED response to the epidemiologic challenges of urban society.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Centers for Disease Control: The HIV/AIDS Epidemic: The First 10 years.MMWR 40:41–44, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Panos Institute: Aids and the Third World. Panos Publications, London, 1988, pp. 128–139.

  3. Centers for Disease Control: HIV Infection in the US: A Review of Current Knowledge.MMWR 36:22–35, 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Go, G.W., Baraff, J.F.,et al. Management guidelines for health care workers exposed to blood and body fluids.Ann. Emerg. Med. 20(1):1341–1350, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Centers for Disease Control: Guidelines for the Prevention of Transmission of HIV and Hepatitis B to Health Care and Public Safety Workers.MMWR 38:32–33, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Marcus, R., and the CDC Cooperative Needlestick Surveillance Group, Surveillance of health care workers exposed to blood from patients infected with HIV.New Engl. J. Med. 319:1115–1123, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Kelen, G.D., DiGiovanna T.A.,et al. Adherence to universal (barrier) precautions during interventions on critically ill and injured emergency department patients.J. Acquired Immune Def. Synd. 3(10):987–994, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Talan, D.A., and Baraff, L.J., Effect of education on the use of universal precautions in a university hospital emergency department.Ann. Emerg. Med. 19(11):1322–1326, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Marcus, R., Culver, D., Bell, D., Zalenski, R.,et al., Risk of HIV infection among emergency department workers.Am. J. Med. 94:1993.

  10. Hammond, J.S., Eckes, J.M.,et al. HIV, trauma, and infection control: Universal precautions are universally ignored.J. Trauma 30(5):555–561, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Kelen, G.D., Fritz, S., and Qaquish, B., Unrecognized human immunodeficiency virus infection in emergency department patients.New Engl. J. Med. 318:1645–1650, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Kelen, G.D., HIV and the emergency department: Risks and protection for health care providers.Ann. Emerg. Med. 19:242–248, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Tanberg, D.,et al. Under-reporting of contaminated needlestick injuries in emergency health care workers.Ann. Emerg. Med. 20(1):969–972, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Tannenbaum, R., Rydman, R., and Zalenski, R., Use of universal precautions in the emergency department. Paper presented at the American Public Health Association, Health Administration Section, November 1991.

  15. Trott, A., Hepatitis B exposure and the emergency physician: Risk assessment and hepatitis vaccine update.Am. J. Emerg. Med. 5:54–59, 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Dolan, P.,et al. Hepatitis C prevention and treatment, risk assessment and hepatitis vaccine update.Am. Fam. Phys. 40:189–195, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Singh V., Risk of exposure of surgical personnel to patient's blood.New Engl. J. Med. 324:57–58, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. From the Cook County Hospital and the University of Illinois, College of Medicine and School of Public Health, 60612, Chicago, Illinois

    R. J. Rydman, R. D. Tannebaum & R. J. Zalenski

Authors
  1. R. J. Rydman
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. R. D. Tannebaum
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. R. J. Zalenski
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Rydman, R.J., Tannebaum, R.D. & Zalenski, R.J. An evaluation of Hospital Emergency Department (HED) adherence to universal precautions. J Med Syst 18, 207–220 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00996705

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00996705

Keywords

Search

Navigation