Skip to main content
Log in

Development of the Treatment Acceptability Questionnaire

  • Published:
Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This article describes the development and psychometric properties of a measure designed to assess the treatment acceptability of psychological treatments for both adult and child populations. Initial evidence on the Treatment Acceptability Questionnaire (TAQ) indicates that it has a good internal consistency and test-retest stability (over a 3-week period). The pattern of correlations with other measures of treatment acceptability for child-oriented interventions provides evidence of concurrent validity. Suggestions are made regarding the further validation and use of the TAQ.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Cavell, T. A., Frentz, C. E., & Kelley, M. L. (1986). Acceptability of paradoxical interventions: Some nonparadoxical findings.Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 17, 519–523.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cross Calvert, S., & Johnston, C. (1990). Acceptability of child behavior problems: Issues and implications for future research.Journal of Child Clinical Psychology, 19, 61–74.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elliott, S. N. (1988a). Acceptability of behavioral treatments: Review of the variables that influence treatment selection.Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 19, 68–80.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elliott, S. N. (1988b). Acceptability of behavioral treatments in educational settings. In J. C. Witt, S. N. Elliott, & F. M. Gresham (Eds.),The handbook of behavior therapy in education (pp. 121–144). New York: Plenum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hovland, J., Janis, I. L., & Kelley, H. H. (1953).Communication and persuasion: Psychological studies of opinion change. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hunsley, J. (1991).The treatment acceptability of symptom prescription techniques. Manuscript submitted for publication.

  • Hunsley, J., & Lefebvre, M. (1991). Clinical psychologists' views of the acceptability of paradoxical techniques.Psychotherapy, 28, 580–587.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kazdin, A. E. (1980). Acceptability of alternative treatments for deviant child behavior.Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 13, 259–273.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kazdin, A. E. (1981). Acceptability of child treatment techniques: The influence of treatment efficacy and adverse side effects.Behavior Therapy, 12, 493–506.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leary, M. R., & Miller, R. S. (1986).Social psychology and dysfunctional behavior: Origins, diagnosis, and treatment. New York: Springer-Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • McMahon, R. J., & Forehand, R. L. (1983). Consumer satisfaction in behavioral treatment of children: Types, issues, and recommendations.Behavior Therapy, 14, 209–225.

    Google Scholar 

  • Norton, G. R., Allen, G. E., & Hilton, J. (1983). The social validity of treatments for agoraphobia.Behaviour Research and Therapy, 21, 393–399.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strong, S. R. (1968). Counseling: An interpersonal influence process.Journal of Counseling Psychology, 15, 215–224.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolf, M. (1978). Social validity: The case for subjective measurement.Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 11, 203–214.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hunsley, J. Development of the Treatment Acceptability Questionnaire. J Psychopathol Behav Assess 14, 55–64 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00960091

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00960091

Key words

Navigation