Skip to main content
Log in

Effectiveness of a home based early intervention program with infants of adolescent mothers

  • Articles
  • Published:
Child Psychiatry and Human Development Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The results of this study suggests that a home based early intervention program can be effective with infants doubly at risk: biomedically as offspring of adolescent mothers and environmentally from low SES. At 30 months of age only 11% of the 19 children in the early intervention group remained at risk while 50% of the 18 children in the control group remained at risk.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Battaglia FC, Frazier TM, Hellegers AE: Obstetric and pediatric complications of juvenile pregnancy.Pediatrics 32:902–990, 1963.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Braen BB, Forbush JB: School-age parenthood — a national overview.J School Health 45:257–262, 1975.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Klerman LV: Adolescent pregnancy: The need for new policies and new programs.J School Health 45:263–267, 1975.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Dott AB, Fort AT: Medical and social factors affecting early teenage pregnancy.Am J Obstet Gynecol 125:532–536, 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Lobl M, Welcher DW, Mellits ED: Maternal age and intellectual functioning of offspring.Johns Hopkins Med J 128:347–361, 1961.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Hardy JB, Welcher DW, Stanley J, et al: Long-range outcome of adolescent pregnancy.Clin Obstet Gynecol 21:1215–1232, 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Oppel WC, Royston AB: Teenage births: some social, psychological and physical sequelae.Am J Public Health 61:751–756, 1971.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Klein L: School-age parents: Models of comprehensive service-regular school-based.J School Health 45:271–273, 1975.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Duenhoelter J, Jimenez J, Baumann G: Pregnancy performance of patients under fifteen years of age.Obstet Gynecol 46:49–52, 1975.

    Google Scholar 

  10. McAnarney ER, Roghman KG, Adama BN, et al: Obstetrical, neonatal, and psychosocial outcome of pregnant adolescents.Pediatrics 61:199–205, 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Zelnick M, Kantner JF: Sexual and contraceptive experience of young unmarried women in the United States, 1976 and 1971.Fam Plan Perspect 9:55–56, 58–63, 67–71, 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  12. McAnarney ER: Adolescent pregnancy — a pediatric concern?Clin Pediatrics 14:19–22, 1975.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Thompson RJ Jr., Cappleman M, Zeitschel K: Neonatal behavior of infants of adolescent mothers.Develop Med Child Neurol 21:474–482, 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Klein L: Antecedents of teenage pregnancy.Clin Obstet Gynecol 21:1151–1159, 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Levenson P, Atkinson B, Hale J, Hollier M: Adolescent parent education: A maturational model.Child Psychiatry Hum Dev 9:104–118, 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Badger E, Burns D, Rhoads B: Education for adolescent mothers in a hospital setting.Am J Public Health 66:469–472, 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Tjossem T: Early intervention: Issues and approaches. In Tjossem T (Ed)Intervention Strategies for High Risk Infants and Young Children. Baltimore: University Park Press, 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Bronfenbrenner V: Is early intervention effective: In M, Gutentag, E Struening (Eds)Handbook of Evaluation Research, Vol. 2. Beverly Hills, Sage Publications, 1975.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Ramey C, Gollier A, Sparling J, et al: A longitudinal and multidisciplinary approach to the prevention of developmental retardation. In T Tjossem (Ed)Intervention Strategies for High Risk Infants and Young Children. Baltimore: University Park Press, 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Frankenburg W, Dodds J. The Denver Developmental Screening Test.J Pediatrics 71:181–191, 1967.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Bayley N:Bayley Scales of Infant Development. New York: The Psychological Corporation, 1969.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Terman L, Merrill M:Stanford Binet Intelligence Scale: Manual for the Third Revision. Boston, Houghton Mifflin, 1973.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Thompson RJ Jr, Linscheid T: Adult-child interaction analysis: Methodology and case application.Child Psychiatry Hum Dev 7:31–42, 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Thompson RJ Jr, Cappleman, MW, Conrad, HH, and Jordan, WB. Early intervention program for adolescent mothers and their infants.Developmental and Behavioral Pediatrics, 3:18–21, 1982.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Thompson RJ Jr: Consequences of using the 1972 Stanford-Binet Intelligence Scale Norms.Psychology in the Schools 14:444–448, 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Ramey C, Campbell F: The prevention of developmental retardation in high risk children. In P Mettler (Ed) Research to Practicein Mental Retardation. Baltimore, University Park Press, 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Ramey C, Smith B: Assessing the intellectual consequences of early intervention with high risk infants.Am J of Mental Deficiency 81:318–324, 1977.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Cappleman, M.W., Thompson, R.J., DeRemer-Sullivan, P.A. et al. Effectiveness of a home based early intervention program with infants of adolescent mothers. Child Psych Hum Dev 13, 55–65 (1982). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00709982

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00709982

Keywords

Navigation