Abstract
We constructed a new type of global quality of life (QOL) scale deriving from the Borg symptom scales and compared four versions of this new type of scale (H scale) with four category rating (CR) scales and four visual analogue (VA) scales. Mean self-ratings and mean scenario ratings on different scales showed small but significant differences, and intercorrelations were higher amongst the H scales than amongst the CR or VA scales. H scales were on average most preferred (by undergraduates and elderly subjects) followed by CR and lastly VA scales in terms of ease of use and perceived accuracy of representation. We investigated the preferred polarity of the scales: subjects preferred ‘Perfect quality of life’ to be indicated by 20 or 100 (with slight preference for the latter) rather than 0. The H scales have eight additional quantifiers between the end labels and there was good agreement about the perceived magnitude of these quantitiers.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Kaplan RM, Bush JW. Health-related quality of life measurement for evaluation of research and policy analysis. Health Psychol 1982; 1: 61–80.
McGee HM, O'Boyle CA, Hickey A, O'Malley K, Joyce CRB. Assessing the quality of life of the individual: the SEIQoL with a healthy and a gastroenterology unit population. Psychol Med 1991; 21: 749–759.
Torrance GW. Measurement of health state utilities for economic appraisal: A review. J Health Econom 1986; 5: 1–30.
Ware JE, Sherbourne CD. The MOS 36-item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36). Med Care 1992: 30: 473–483.
Tsevat J, Goldman L, Lamas GA, Pfeffer MA, Chapin CG, Connors KF, Lee TH. Functional status versus utilities in survivors of myocardial infarction. Med Care 1991; 29: 1153–1159.
Skavem K.. Quality of life in epilepsy: Comparison of four utility measures. Qual Life Res 1995; 4: 489–490.
Daly E, Gray A, Barlow D, McPherson K, Roche M, Vessey M. Measuring the impact of menopausal symptoms on quality of life. BMJ 1993; 307: 836–834.
Borg G. A category scale with ratio properties for intermodal and interindividual comparisons. In: Geissler HG, Petzold P, eds. Psychological judgement and the process of perception. Berlin: VEB Deutscher Verlag der Vissenschaften, 1982: 25–34.
Sylven C, Borg G, Brandt R, Beerman R, Jonzon B. Dose-effect relationship of adenosine provoked angina pectoris-like pain: a study of the psychophysical power function. Eur Heart J 1988; 9: 87–91.
Borg G, Van den Burg M, Hassmen P, Kaijser L, Tanaka S. Relationship between perceived exertion, HR, and HLa in cycling, running and walking. Scand J Sports Sci 1987; 9: 69–77.
Borg G, Ljunggren G, Ceci R. The increase of perceived exertion, aches and pain in the legs, heart rate and blood lactate during exercise on a bicycle ergometer. Eur J Appl Physiol 1985; 54: 343–349.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Hyland, M.E., Sodergren, S.C. Development of a new type of global quality of life scale, and comparison of performance and preference for 12 global scales. Qual Life Res 5, 469–480 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00540019
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00540019