Skip to main content
Log in

Cutaneous drug reactions

An attempt to quantitative estimation

  • Original Contributions
  • Published:
Archives of Dermatological Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

The drugs taken by patients with suspected cutaneous drug reactions (CDR) were recorded during a 4-year period at Sahlgren Hospital in Gotenburg in a prospective study. A total of 440 patients were included. By dividing the frequency of occurrence of the recorded drugs by the number of sold defined daily doses (SDDD) for the city during the same period of time, figures for the CDR risk for different drugs corrected for frequency of use were obtained. The risk of CDR seemed to be highest for gold compounds, trimethoprim with and without sulphonamides, cephalosporins and penicillins. The most common types of CDR were macular and mucalopapular eruptions, followed by urticaria and cutaneous vasculitis. The results correlate well with those of the Boston Collaborative Drug Surveillance Program.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Arndt KA, Jick H (1976) Rates of cutaneous reactions to drugs: a report from the Boston Collaborative Drug Surveillance Program. J Am Med Assoc 235: 918–923

    Google Scholar 

  2. Bigby M, Jick S, Jick H. Arndt K (1986) Drug-induced cutaneous reactions. A report from the Boston Collaborative Drug Surveillance Program on 15 438 consecutive inpatients, 1975 to 1982. J Am Med Assoc 256: 3358–3363

    Google Scholar 

  3. Bork K (1988) Cutaneous side effects of drugs. W. B. Saunders, Philadelphia, p 8

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Swanbeck, G., Dahlberg, E. Cutaneous drug reactions. Arch Dermatol Res 284, 215–218 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00375796

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00375796

Key words

Navigation