Abstract
A total of 231 children with acute appendicitis were treated at our hospitals during the 10 years between 1984 and 1993, 53 of whom had a perforated appendix. These 53 patients were randomly assigned to two groups at the time of surgery according to the different procedures performed. Thus, 29 children were managed by appendectomy followed by peritoneal lavage using a large amount of saline, and intravenous antibiotic therapy consisting of aminoglycoside and cephem (lavage group), while the other 24 children were treated by appendectomy with silicon tube drainage and the same systemic antibiotic therapy (drainage group). The mean length of hospitalization, and the mean durations of fever and the need for fasting after laparotomy in the lavage group were significantly less than those in the drainage group: 10.1 versus 18.8 days, 2.8 versus 7.7 days, and 1.8 versus 3.5 days, respectively. The operation wounds healed well in the lavage group due to the fact that there was no drain. Wound infections occurred in two children from the lavage group and six from the drainage group. Intra-abdominal abscesses occurred in two children from the drainage group. Accordingly, peritoneal lavage appears to be superior to intraperitoneal tube drainage for the management of perforated appendicitis in children.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Johnson DA, Kosloske AM, Macarthur C (1993) Perforated appendicitis in children: to drain or not to drain? Pediatr Surg Int 8:402–405
Curran TJ, Muenchow SK (1993) The treatment of complicated appendicitis in children using peritoneal drainage: Results from a public hospital. J Pediatr Surg 28:204–208
Schwartz MZ, Tapper D, Solenberger RI (1983) Management of perforated appendicitis in children. Ann Surg 197:407–411
David IB, Buck JR, Filler RM (1982) Rational use of antibiotics for perforated appendicitis in children. J Pediatr Surg 17:494–500
Haller JA, Shaker IJ, Donahoo JS, Schnaufer L, White JJ (1973) Peritoneal drainage versus non-drainage for generalized peritonitis from ruptured appendicitis in children. Ann Surg 177:595–600
Karp MP, Caldarola VA, Cooney DR, Allen JE, Jewett TC Jr (1986) The avoidable excesses in the management of perforated appendicitis in children. J Pediatr Surg 21:506–510
Neilson IR, Laberbe JM, Nguyen LT, Moir C, Doody D, Sonnino RE, Youssef S, Guttman FM (1990) Appendicitis in children: Current therapeutic recommendation. J Pediatr Surg 25:1113–1116
Elmore JR, Dibbins AW, Curci MR (1987) The treatment of complicated appendicitis in children: What is the gold standard?. Arch Surg 122:424–427
Krukowski ZH, Irwin ST, Denholm S (1988) Preventing wound infection after appendectomy: A review. Br J Surg 75:1023–1033
Sherman JO, Luck SR, Borger JA (1976) Irrigation of the peritoneal cavity for appendicitis in children: A double-blind study. J Pediatr Surg 11:371–374
Grosfeld JL, Solit RW (1968) Prevention of wound infection in perforated appendicitis; Experience with delayed primary wound closure. Ann Surg 168:891–895
Stone HH, Sanders SL, Martin JD (1971) Perforated appendicitis in children. Surgery 673–679
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Toki, A., Ogura, K., Horimi, T. et al. Peritoneal lavage versus drainage for perforated appendicitis in children. Surg Today 25, 207–210 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00311528
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00311528