Summary
It has been proposed that vertebral dimensions be used to objectively identify vertebral fractures, permitting standardization of methodology for comparisons between studies. In this report, we evaluate the ability of various vertebral dimensions and ratios to identify “abnormal” vertebrae. As no “gold standard” exists for prevalent vertebral fractures, we examined the ability of cross-sectional dimensions (at a single point in time) to detect fractured vertebrae that had been identified from changes in dimensions compared with previous radiographs. Theoretically, a cutoff of 3 SD below the mean will rarely misclassify normal vertebrae as fractured (specificity=99.9%). However, we found that this cutoff correctly identified only about 70% of the incident fractures. A less stringent criterion (2 SD below the mean; theoretical specificity=97.7%) identified about 85–90% of true fractures. Dividing by stature or other vertebral heights sometimes yielded marginal improvements in the ability of the anterior or posterior height dimensions to diagnose fractures. The results suggest that the true fracture prevalence may sometimes be substantially higher than suggested by cross-sectional vertebral measurements.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Finn Jensen G, McNair P, Boesen J, Hegedus V (1984) Validity in diagnosing osteoporosis. Eur J Radiol 4:1–3
Black D, Cummings SR, Stone K, Hudes E, Palermo L, Steiger P (1991) A new approach to defining normal vertebral dimensions. J Bone Miner Res 6:883–891
Yano K, Wasnich RD, Vogel JM, Heilbrun LK (1984) Bone mineral measurements among middle-aged and elderly Japanese residents in Hawaii. Am J Epidemiol 119:751–764
Ross PD, Wasnich RD, Davis JW, Vogel JM (1991) Vertebral dimension differences between Caucasian populations, and between Caucasians and Japanese. Bone 12:107–112
Spencer NE, Steiger P, Cummings SR, Genant HK (1990) Placement of points for digitizing spine films. J Bone Miner Res 5(suppl 2):S247
Gallagher JC, Hedlund LR, Stoner S, Meeger C (1988) Vertebral morphometry: normative data. Bone Miner 4:189–196
Melton LJ III, Kan SH, Frye MA, Wahner HW, O'Fallon WM, Riggs BL (1989) Epldemiology of vertebral fractures in women. Am J Epidemiol 129:1000–1011
Davies KM, Recker RR, Heaney RP (1989) Normal vertebral dimensions and normal variation in serial measurements of vertebrae. J Bone Miner Res 4:341–349
Minne HW, Leidig G, Wuster C, Siromachkostoy L, Baldauf G, Bickel R, Sauer P, Lojen M, Ziegler R (1988) A newly developed spine deformity index (SDI) to quantitate vertebral crush fractures in patients with osteoporosis. Bone Miner 3:335–349
Ross PD, Davis JW, Epstein R, Wasnich RD (1991) Pre-existing fractures and bone mass predict vertebral fracture incidence. Ann Intern Med 114(11):919–923
Nelson DA, Kleerekoper M, Havstad S, Peterson E (1991) Vertebral deformities in osteoporosis may be transient events: the “rebound” phenomenon. J Bone Miner Res 6(suppl 1):S275
Melton LJ III, Chao EYS, Lane J (1988) Biomechanical aspects of fractures. In: Riggs BL, Melton III LJ (eds) Osteoporosis: etiology, diagnosis, and management. Raven Press, New York, pp 111–131
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Ross, P.D., Davis, J.W., Epstein, R.S. et al. Ability of vertebral dimensions from a single radiograph to identify fractures. Calcif Tissue Int 51, 95–99 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00298495
Received:
Revised:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00298495