Abstract
A brief summary is presented of the epidemiological, embryological, clinical, and etiological aspects of myelomeningocele. The natural history of this disease is reviewed, as are the implications of present-day treatment. An analysis is made of the cost of overall treatment, including neurological, orthopedic and urological surgery, as well as physical and psychological rehabilitation and specialized educational therapy. The costs are high, both monetarily and from the viewpoint of social handicaps. The author's personal experience is analyzed. The outcome of treatment is poor, probably due to the economic limits which do not allow full treatment. Several questions are asked: Should these children be operated upon? Which children should be operated upon? Who must bear the costs of treatment? The author gives his point of view concerning these questions.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Ames MD, Schut L (1972) Results of treatment of 171 consecutive myelomeningoceles — 1963 to 1968. Pediatrics 50:466–470
Beltrán BF, Martín del Campo N, Peña A, et al (1979) Costo de la atención integral de las malformaciones congénitas. (Los defectos del nacimiento como problema de salud pública en México.) Clates, México
Brereton RJ, Zachary RB, Lister L (1977) Urinary continence in open myelomeningocele. Arch Dis Child 52:703–707
Cheek WR, Laurente JP, Cech D (1983) Operative repair of lumbosacral myelomeningocele. J Neurosurg 59:718–722
Elwood JM (1983) Can vitamins prevent neural tube defects? Can Med Assoc J 129:1088–1092
French BN (1980) Midline fusion defects and defects of formation. In: Youmans JR (ed) Neurological surgery, vol 3. Saunders, Philadelphia
Guthkelch AN (1976) The indications and contraindications for early operation in myelomeningocele. In: Morley TP (ed) Current controversies in neurosurgery. Saunders, Philadelphia
Hemmer R (1971) Meningoceles and myeloceles. Progr Neurol Surg 4:192–226
Howe JR (1977) Patient care in neurosurgery. Little, Brown & Co, Boston
Hunt G, Lewin W, Gleave J, et al (1973) Predictive factors in open myelomeningocele with special reference to sensory level. Br Med J 4:197–201
Laurence KM (1964) The natural history of spina bifida cystica. Arch Dis Child 39:41–57
Lorber J (1971) Results of treatment of myelomeningocele. An analysis of 524 unselected cases, with special reference to possible selection for treatment. Dev Med Child Neurol 13:279–303
Macías R, Tena L (1983) Myelomeningocele: new technique for skin repair. Child's Brain 10:73–78
Matson DD (1969) Neurosurgery of infancy and childhood, 2nd edn. Thomas, Springfield, Ill
Raimondi AJ, Soare P (1974) Intellectual development in shunted hydrocephalic children. Am J Dis Child 127:664–671
Sharrard NWJ, Zachary RB, Lober, J, et al (1963) A controlled trial of inmediate and delayed closure of spina bifida cystica. Arch Dis Child 38:18–22
Smith ED (1965) Spina bifida and the total care of spinal myelomeningocele. Thomas, Springfield, Ill
Smith HP, Russel JM, Boyce WH, et al (1979) Results of urinary diversion in patients with myelomeningocele. J Neurosurg 50:773–778
Stein SC, Schut L, Ames MD (1974) Selection for early treatment in myelomeningocele: retrospective analysis of various selection procedures. Pediatrics 54:553–557
Tew BJ, Payne H, Laurence KM (1974) Must a family with a handicapped child be a handicapped family? Dev Med Child Neurol [Suppl] 32:95–98
Thompson NW, Rudd NL (1976) The genetics of spinal dysraphism. In: Morley TP (ed) Current controversies in neurosurgery. Saunders, Philadelphia
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Macías, R. Surgical considerations in the management of myelomeningocele. Child's Nerv Syst 2, 10–12 (1986). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00274026
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00274026