Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Increasing sensitivity and specificity of Doppler sonographic detection of renal transplant rejection with serial investigation technique

  • Original Article
  • Published:
The clinical investigator Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Acute rejection episodes are the most common cause leading to loss of renal grafts in the early postoperative phase. Doppler sonography presents a noninvasive tool to detect increased arterial blood flow resistance as a result of rejection. This can be measured by the increase in the resistive index (RI) and the pulsatility index (PI). In a prospective study including 65 consecutive patients we investigated whether the detection of rejection episodes is improved by determining RI or PI serially twice a week instead of performing a single examination in cases of transplant dysfunction. In 330 examinations with a color-coded Doppler device (Philips QAD 1, Philips Medical Systems Hamburg, Germany) flow profiles were obtained by means of pulse-wave Doppler over at least three interlobar arteries of the renal transplant and RI and PI were calculated. In 41 cases primary rejections were better recognized by an increase in PI compared to the preceding value than by the absolute PI value (with a sensitivity of 90%; specificity was 76% and 42% respectively). The RI was less specific (with a sensitivity of 90%; specificity was 47% for the relative RI increase and 30% for the absolute RI value). The continuous PI increase started an average of 3.3 days (95% CI −15.25 to + 1.55) before rejection was diagnosed. Vascular rejection episodes showed higher PI values than interstitial rejections (3.86 ± 2.14 vs. 2.19 ± 0.87; P < 0.01). The serial investigation technique of PI allows better recognition of rejection episodes than the single measurement of RI or PI performed so far. Doppler sonography recognizes rejection at an early stage.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

RI:

resistive index

PI:

pulsatility index

ARF:

acute renal failure

ROC:

receiver operating characteristic

References

  1. Allen KS, Jorkasky DK, Arger PH, Velchik MG, Grumbach K, Coleman BG, Mintz MC, Betsch SE, Perloff LJ (1988) Renal allografts: prospective analysis of Doppler sonography. Radiology 169:371–376

    Google Scholar 

  2. Arima M, Ishibashi M, Usami M, Sagawa S, Mizutani S, Sonoda T, Ichikawa S, Ihara H, Nagano S (1979) Analysis of the arterial blood flow patterns of normal and allografted kidneys by the directional ultrasonic Doppler technique. J Urol 122:587–591

    Google Scholar 

  3. Arima M, Takahara S, Ihara H, Ichikawa Y, Ischibshi M, Sagawa S, Nagano S, Takaha M, Sonoda T (1982) Predictability of renal allograft prognosis during rejection crisis by ultrasonic Doppler flow technique. Urology 19:389–394

    Google Scholar 

  4. Arima M, Ogino T, Hosokawa S, Ihara H, Ikoma F (1989) Functional image diagnosis of kidney transplants using ultrasonic Doppler flowmetry and magnetic resonance imaging. Transplant Proc 21:1907–1911

    Google Scholar 

  5. Crockcroft DW, Gault MH (1976) Prediction of creatinine clearance from serum creatinine. Nephron 16:31–41

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Deane C (1992) Doppler and color Doppler ultrasonography in renal transplants: chronic rejection. J Clin Ultrasound 20:539–544

    Google Scholar 

  7. de Gaetano AM, Boldrini G, Nanni G, Serino F, Giovannini I, Castagneto M (1989) Noninvasive surveillance of allografted kidneys by ultrasonic duplex scanning. Angiology 40:705–715

    Google Scholar 

  8. Don S, Kopecky KK, Filo RS, Leapman SB, Thomalla JV, Jones JA, Klatte EC (1989) Duplex Doppler US of renal allografts: causes of elevated resistive index. Radiology 171:709–712

    Google Scholar 

  9. Drake DG, Day DL, Letourneau JG, Alford BA, Sibley RK, Mauer SM, Bunchman TE (1990) Doppler evaluation of renal transplants in children: a prospective analysis with histopathologic correlation. Am J Roentgenol 154:785–787

    Google Scholar 

  10. García R, Rodríguez-Iturbe B, Henríquez-La Roche C, Marín C, Mosquera J (1989) Intrarenal manometry in the diagnosis of acute rejection superimposed on acute tubular necrosis in renal transplantation. Clin Nephrol 32:21–26

    Google Scholar 

  11. Genkins SM, Sanfilippo FP, Carroll BA (1989) Duplex Doppler sonography of renal transplants: lack of sensitivity and specificity in establishing pathologic diagnosis. Am J Roentgenol 152:535–539

    Google Scholar 

  12. Granato DB, Salimi Z, George EA, Salinas Madrigal L, Garvin PJ (1988) Recurrent hemolytic uremic syndrome in a renal transplant recipient. Clin Nucl Med 13:171–174

    Google Scholar 

  13. Griffin JF, Short CD, Lawler W, Mallick NP, Johnson RW (1986) Diagnosis of disease in renal allografts: correlation between ultrasound and histology. Clin Radiol 37:59–62

    Google Scholar 

  14. Guckel C, Krestin GP, Wienand P (1989) Duplexsonographie und Kernspintomographie bei der Abklärung nephrologischer Komplikationen nach Nierentransplantation. Rofo Fortschr Geb Rontgenstr Neuen Bildgeb Verfahr 151:547–552

    Google Scholar 

  15. Hanley JA, McNeil BJ (1982) The meaning and use of the area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. Radiology 143:29–36

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Harris DC, Antico V, Allen R, Gruenewald S, Lawrence S, Stewart JH, Chapman JR (1989) Doppler assessment in renal transplantation. Transplant Proc 21:1895–1896

    Google Scholar 

  17. Hollenbeck M, Stuhrmann M, Trapp R, Grabensee B (1991) Farbkodierte Dopplersonographie zur Früherkennung von Abstossungsreaktionen nach allogener Nierentransplantation Dtsch Med Wochenschr 116:921–927

    Google Scholar 

  18. Kelcz F, Pozniak MA, Pirsch JD, Oberly TD (1990) Pyramidal appearance and resistive index: insensitive and nonspecific sonography indicators of renal transplant rejection. Am J Roentgenol 155:531–535

    Google Scholar 

  19. Leimenstoll G, Engemann R, Grigat KP, Bartholdy A, Niedermayer W (1990) Duplex ultrasound: monitoring of rejection episodes of renal allografts. Transplant Proc 22:1392–1394

    Google Scholar 

  20. Mostbeck GH, Gossinger HD, Mallek R, Siostrzonek P, Schneider B, Tscholakoff D (1990) Effect of heart rate on Doppler measurements of resistive index in renal arteries. Radiology 175:511–513

    Google Scholar 

  21. Nicolet V, Carignan L, Dubuc G, Hebert G, Bourdon F, Paquin F (1988) Thickening of the renal collecting system: a nonspecific finding at US. Radiology 168:411–413

    Google Scholar 

  22. Perchik JE, Baumgartner BR, Bernardino ME (1991) Renal transplant rejection. Limited value of duplex Doppler sonography. Invest Radiol 26:422–426

    Google Scholar 

  23. Perrella RR, Duerinckx AJ, Tessler FN, Danovitch GM, Wilkinson A, Gonzalez S, Cohen AH, Grant EG (1990) Evaluation of renal transplant dysfunction by duplex Doppler sonography: a prospective study and review of the literature. Am J Kidney Dis 15:544–550

    Google Scholar 

  24. Platt JF, Ellis JH, Rubin JM, DiPictro MA, Sedman AB (1990) Intrarenal arterial Doppler sonography in patients with nonobstructive renal disease: correlation of resistive index with biopsy findings. Am J Roentgenol 154:1223–1227

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Platt JF, Ellis JH, Rubin JM (1991) Renal transplant pyelocaliectasis: role of duplex Doppler US in evaluation. Radiology 179:425–428

    Google Scholar 

  26. Pozniak MA, Kelcz F, Stratta RJ, Oberley TD (1988) Extraneous factors affecting resistive index. Invest Radiol 23:899–904

    Google Scholar 

  27. Pozniak MA, Kelcz F, D'Alessandro A, Oberley T, Stratta R (1992) Sonography of renal transplants in dogs: the effect of acute tubular necrosis, cyclosporine nephrotoxicity, and acute rejection on resistive index and renal length. Am J Roentgenol 158:791–797

    Google Scholar 

  28. Rasmussen K, Pedersen E (1990) Doppler ultrasound in the diagnosis of renal allograft rejection and in monitoring the effect of treatment. Scand J Clin Lab Invest 50:57–61

    Google Scholar 

  29. Rifkin MD, Needleman L, Pasto ME, Kurtz AB, Foy PM, McGlynn E, Canino C, Baltarowich OH, Pennell RG, Goldberg BB (1987) Evaluation of renal transplant rejection by duplex Doppler examination: value of the resistive index. Am J Roentgenol 148:759–762

    Google Scholar 

  30. Rigsby CM, Taylor KJ, Weltin G, Burns PN, Bia M, Princenthal RA, Kashgarian M, Flye MW (1986) Renal allografts in acute rejection: evaluation using duplex sonography. Radiology 158:375–378

    Google Scholar 

  31. Rigsby CM, Burns PN, Weltin GG, Chen B, Bia M, Taylor KJ (1987) Doppler signal quantitation in renal allografts: comparison in normal and rejecting transplants, with pathologic correlation. Radiology 162:39–42

    Google Scholar 

  32. Salaman JR, Griffin PJA (1983) Fine-needle intrarenal manometry: a new test for rejection in cyclosporin-treated recipients of kidney transplants. Lancet II:709–711

    Google Scholar 

  33. Schwerk WB, Restrepo IK, Prinz H (1993) Semiquantitative Analysen intrarenaler arterieller Dopplerspektren bei gesunden Erwachsenen. Ultraschall Med 14:117–122

    Google Scholar 

  34. Stevens PE, Gwyther SJ, Hanson ME, Woodrow DF, Phillips ME, Boultbee JE (1993) Interpretation of duplex Doppler ultrasound in renal transplants in the early postoperative period. Nephrol Dial Transplant 8:255–258

    Google Scholar 

  35. Townsend RR, Tomlanovich SJ, Goldstein RB, Filly RA (1990) Combined Doppler and morphologic sonographic evaluation of renal transplant rejection. J Ultrasound Med 9:199–206

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Warshauer DM, Taylor KJ, Bia MJ, Marks WH, Weltin GG, Rigsby CM, True LD, Lorber MI (1988) Unusual causes of increased vascular impedance in renal transplants: duplex Doppler evaluation. Radiology 169:367–370

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Klinik für Nephrologie, Heinrich-Heine-Universität, Moorenstrasse 5, D-40225, Düsseldorf, Germany

    M. Hollenbeck, N. Hilbert, F. Meusel & B. Grabensee

Authors
  1. M. Hollenbeck
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. N. Hilbert
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. F. Meusel
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. B. Grabensee
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hollenbeck, M., Hilbert, N., Meusel, F. et al. Increasing sensitivity and specificity of Doppler sonographic detection of renal transplant rejection with serial investigation technique. Clin Investig 72, 609–615 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00227454

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00227454

Key words

Search

Navigation