Skip to main content
Log in

Evaluation of stents following septoplasty

  • Published:
Aesthetic Plastic Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This prospective study was designed to evaluate the immediate postoperative course and long-term efficacy of septal stents. In 20 patients who underwent primary septorhinoplasty, Doyle 11 silicone stents were inserted bilaterally parallel to the septum. The stents were removed after an average of 3.3 days. A hollow tube was designed into this particular stent in an attempt to minimize patients discomfort from nasal airway obstruction. Subjective ratings of airway improvement were very similar for patients whose septums were supported with nasal stents and for those patients from our 1989 study whose noses were treated with nasal packing. However, the number of patients who complained about discomfort was substantially higher in the stent group, 60% (12 of 20), compared with the nasal packing group, 22% (5 of 23 patients) (p < 0.05). The percentage of partial residual or recurrent septal deviation was also slightly higher in the stent group, 25% (5 of 20), than in the packing group, 13% (3 of 23 patients), but this was not statistically significant (p > 0.50). The alar base incision was partially dehisced during removal of the stent in one patient, in spite of a routine reduction in the width of the splint.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bernal-Sprekelsen M: The postoperative nasal dressing: A new intranasal splint. Rhinology 28(3): 197–203, 1990

    Google Scholar 

  2. Campbell JB, Watson MG, Shenoi PM: The role of intranasal splints in the prevention of post-operative nasal adhesions. J Laryngol Otol 101:1140–1143, 1987

    Google Scholar 

  3. Cohen S: Postrhinoplastic intranasal adhesions. Arch Otolaryngol 54:683–692, 1951

    Google Scholar 

  4. Cook JA: Intranasal splints and their effects on intranasal adhesions and septal stability. Clin Otolaryngol 17(1):24–27, 1992

    Google Scholar 

  5. Gilchrist AG: Surgery of the nasal septum and pyramid. J Laryngol Otol 88:759–771, 1974

    Google Scholar 

  6. Guyuron B: Is packing after septorhinoplasty necessary? A randomized study. Plast Reconstr Surg 84(1):41–44, 1989

    Google Scholar 

  7. Maliniac JW: The role of the septum in rhinoplasty. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 48:189–201, 1948

    Google Scholar 

  8. Spillman D: Aspiration von nasentamponaden mit todesfolge. Laryngol Rhinol Otolaryngol Stutt 60:56, 1981

    Google Scholar 

  9. Wagner R, Toback J: Toxic shock syndrome following septorhinoplasty using septal splints. Laryngoscope 96:609, 1986

    Google Scholar 

  10. Wallace AF: Maintenance of postoperative airway. Br J Plast Surg 15:318, 1962

    Google Scholar 

  11. Wieland H: Ober die Verbandstechnik nach plastischer gesichtschirurgie. J Med Kosmet 8:240–245, 1959

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Guyuron, B., Vaughan, C. Evaluation of stents following septoplasty. Aesth. Plast. Surg. 19, 75–77 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00209314

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00209314

Key words

Navigation