References
Cicourel, A.V. (1964). Method and Measurement in Sociology. New York: Free Press.
Denzin, N.V. (1970). The Research Act: A Theoretical Introduction to Sociological Methods. Chicago: Aldine.
Dijkstra, W. and Van der Zouwen, J., eds. (1982). Response Behaviour in the Survey Interview. London/New York: Academic Press.
Freeman, J. and Butler, W. (1976). “Some sources of interviewer variance in surveys”, Public Opinion Quarterly 40: 79–92.
Hagenaars, J.A. and Heinen, T.G. (1982). “Response effects of ‘role-independent’ interviewer characteristics”, pp. 91–130 in W., Dijkstra and J. van der, Zouwen, eds., Response Behaviour in the Survey Interview. London/New York: Academic Press.
Henson, R., Cannell, C.F. and Lawson, S. (1976). “Effects of interviewer style on quality of reporting in a survey interview”, Journal of Psychology 93: 221–227.
Kish, L. (1962). “Studies of interviewer variance for attitudinal variables”, Journal of the American Statistical Association 57: 92–115.
Landis, J.R., Sullivan, D. and Sheley, J. (1973). “Feminist attitudes as related to sex of the interviewer”, Pacific Sociological Review 16: 305–314.
O'Muircheartaigh, C.A. (1976). “Response errors in an attitudinal sample survey”, Quality and Quantity 10: 97–115.
Phillips, D.L. (1971). Knowledge from What? Chicago: Rand McNally.
Sudman, S. and Bradburn, N.M. (1974). Response Effects in Surveys. Chicago: Aldine.
Winer, B.J. (1971). Statistical Principles in Experimental Design. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Dijkstra, W. How interviewer variance can bias the results of research on interviewer effects. Qual Quant 17, 179–187 (1983). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00167582
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00167582