Skip to main content
Log in

Vertebrate receptor optics and orientation

  • Published:
Documenta Ophthalmologica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Vertebrate photoreceptors act as optical waveguides. They exhibit directionality, non-uniform distribution of energy within and immediately about the receptor, etc. Photolabile pigment absorption favors light traveling axially down the receptor. Clearly these properties influence response of the transducer. Retinal receptors, rods and cones, are aligned normally with a point approximating the center of the exit pupil of the eye. Taken together, these findings suggest that a prime role of receptor optics is to favor acceptance of the pertinent visual stimulus passing through the pupillary aperture and to inhibit stray light noise contained in the integrating spherelike eyes.

Many intriguing problems remain to be resolved. It is necessary to relate the properties of the receptor as a waveguide to determinations of directional sensitivity of the retina (Stiles-Crawford effects), and in particular, to understand mechanisms leading to fine receptor alignment. There must also be a pathology of receptor orientation - a science still its infancy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bailey, J.E. Directional Sensivity of Retinal Receptors, Dissertation, Indiana Univ., Bloomington, Indiana, 1974.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bailey, J.E. The Orientation Properties of Retinal Rods. Optom. Weekly 63: No. 19, 32–33 (1972).

    Google Scholar 

  • Barer, R. Refractometry and Interferometry of Living Cells. J. Optical Soc. Amer. 47: 545–556 (1957).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bedell, H.E. & Enoch, J.M. A Study of the Stiles-Crawford Function at 35° in the Temporal Field. J. Optical Soc. Amer. (in press). See also Enoch, J.M. & Hope, G.M. Investigative Ophthal. 12: 497–503 (1973).

  • Benson, W.E. et al. Best's Vitelliform Macular Dystrophy. Amer. J. Ophthal. 79: 59–66 (1975).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Campos, E., Bedell, H., Enoch, J. & Fitzgerald, C. Retinal Receptive Field-like Properties and Stiles-Crawford Effect Followed in a Patient with Traumatic Choroidal Rupture. Documenta Ophthal. 45: 381–395 (1978).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Coble, J. & Rushton, W.A.H. Stiles-Crawford Effect and the Bleaching of Cone Pigments. J. Physiol. (Lond.) 217: 231–242 (1971).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Enoch, J.M. The Current Status of Receptor Amblyopia. Documenta Ophthal. 23: 130–148 (1967).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Enoch, J.M. Marked Accommodation, Retinal Stretch, Monocular Space Perception and Retinal Receptor Orientation, Charles F. Prentice Lecture, 1974. Amer. J. Optom. and Physiol. Opt. 52: 375–392 (1975).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Enoch, J.M. Nature of the Transmission of Energy in the Retinal Receptors. J. Optical Soc. Amer. 51: 1122–1126 (1961).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Enoch, J.M. Optical Properties of the Retinal Receptors. J. Optical Soc. Amer. 53: 71–85 (1963).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Enoch, J.M. Retinal Directional Resolution: In Visual Science (Edited by J. Pierce and J. Levine), Indiana Univ. Press, Bloomington, Indiana, 1971.

    Google Scholar 

  • Enoch, J.M. Retinal Receptor Orientation and the Role of Fiber Optics in Vision, First Glenn A. Fry lecture. Amer. J. Optom. 49: 455–470 (1972).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Enoch, J.M. Vertebrate Receptor Orientation. Int. J. Quantum Chem.: Quantum Biology Symp. No. 3: 65–88 (1976).

  • Enoch, J.M. Vertebrate Rod Receptors Are Directionally Sensitive. In Photoreceptor Optics (Edited by A. Snyder and R. Menzel), Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1975, pp. 17–37.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Enoch, J.M., Bedell, H. & Campos, E. Local Variations in Rod Receptor Orientation. Vision Research 18: 123–124 (1978).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Enoch, J.M. & Glismann, L. Physical and Optical Changes in Excised Retinal Tissue. Investigative Ophthal. 5: 208–221 (1966).

    Google Scholar 

  • Enoch, J.M. & Horowitz, B. The Vertebrate Retinal Receptor as a Waveguide. In Proc. Polytech. Inst. of New York Microwave Research Inst. Symp. 23. Polytechnic Press, New York, 1974, pp. 133–159.

    Google Scholar 

  • Enoch, J.M. & Scandrett, J. Human Far Field Radiation Pattern. Investigative Ophthal. 10: 167–170 (1911).

    Google Scholar 

  • Enoch, J.M., Scandrett, J. & Tobey, F.L. Jr. A Study of the Effects of Bleaching on the Width and Index of Refraction of Frog Rod Outer Segments. Vision Research 13: 171–183 (1973).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Enoch, J.M. & Tobey, F.L., Jr. Special Microscope Microspectrophotometer: Optical Design and Application to the Determination of Waveguide Properties of Frog Rods. J. Optical Soc. Amer. 63: 1345–1356 (1973).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Enoch, J.M. & Tobey, F.L., Jr. Use of the Waveguide Parameter V to Determine Difference in the Index of Refraction Between the Rat Rod Outer Segment and the Interstitial Matrix. J. Optical Soc. Amer. 68: 1130–1134 (1978).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Fineran, B. & Nicol, J.A.C. Studies on the Eyes of Anchovies (Anchoa Mitchilli and A. Hepsetus Engraulidae) with Particular Reference to the Pigment Epithelium. Philosophical Trans. Roy. Soc. Lond., Biol. Series 276: 321–350 (1977).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Fitzgerald, C., Enoch, J., Campos E. & Bedell, H. Comparison of Changes in Visual Functions in Two Cases of Senile Macular Degeneration. A. Von Graefe's Arch. Klin. exp. Ophthal. 210: 79–91 (1979).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Von Helmholtz, H. Treatise on Physiological Optics, 3rd Edition, Translated by J. Southall, Dover Publications, New York, 1962. See Volume 1. p. 18 (Czermak's Orthoscope); Volume 2, p. 35 (Perceived distortion of fine grid lines).

    Google Scholar 

  • Kapany, N., Fiber Optics, In Strong, John, Concepts of Classical Optics, W.H. Freeman and Co., San Francisco, 1958, pp. 553–579.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laties, A.M. Histological Techniques for Study of Photoreceptor Orientation. Tissue and Cell 1: 63–81 (1969).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Laties, A.M. & Enoch, J.M. An Analysis of Retinal Receptor Orientation I. Angular Relationships of Neighboring Photoreceptors, Investigative Ophthal. 10: 69–77 (1971).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Locket, N.A. Retinal Anatomy of Some Scopelarchid Deep Sea Fishes: Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond., Series B, 178: 161–184 (1971).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Machemer, R., Experimental Retinal Detachment in the Owl Monkey. IV. The Reattached Retina. Amer. J. Ophthal. 66: 1075–1091 (1968).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • McRenolds, J.S. & Gorman, A. Photoreceptor Potentials of Opposite Polarity in the Eye of the Scallop, Pecten Irradians. J. Gen. Physiol. 56: 376–406, 392–406 (1970).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mellerio, J. Light Absorption and Scatter in the Human Lens. Vision Research 11: 129–141 (1971). See also, Weale, R. Vision Research 1: 183–191 (1961).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ohzu, H. & Enoch, J.M. Optical Modulation by the Isolated Human Fovea. Vision Research 12: 245–251 (1972).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ohzu, H., Enoch, J.M. & O'Hair, J. Optical Modulation by the Isolated Retina and Retinal Receptors. Vision Research 12: 231–244 (1972).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sidman, R.L. The Structure and Concentration of Solids in Photoreceptor Cells studied by Refractometry and Interference Microscopy. J. Biophysical and Biochem. Cytol. 3: 15–30 (1957).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Snyder, A.W. & Menzel, R. Photoreceptor Optics, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1975.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Steinberg, R. & Wood, I. Pigment Epithelial Cell Ensheathment of Cone Outer Segments in the Retina of the Domestic Cat. Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond., Series B. 187: 461–478 (1974).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Steinberg, R., Wood, I. & Hogan, N. Pigment Ensheathment and Phagocytosis of Extrafoveal Cones in Human Retina. Philosophical Trans. Roy. Soc. Lond. Biological Ser. 277: 459–474 (1977).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Stiles, W.S. The Directional Sensitivity of the Retina. Annals Royal College Surgeons of England 30: 73–101 (1962).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Tobey, F.L. Jr., Enoch, J. & Scandrett, J. Experimentally Determined Optical Properties of Goldfish Cones and Rods. Investigative Ophthal. 14: 7–23 (1975).

    Google Scholar 

  • Webb, N.G. Orientation of Retinal Rod Receptor Membranes in the Intact Eye Using X-ray Diffraction. Vision Research 17: 625–631 (1977).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Westheimer, G. Dependence of the Magnitude of the Stiles-Crawford Effect on Retinal Location. J. Physiol. (Lond.) 192: 309–315 (1967).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

The research has been supported in part by a National Eye Institute Research Grant No. EY-01418, NIH, Bethesda, Maryland. The author also whishes to express his appreciation to the Japanese Society for the Promotion of Science.

Invited Keynote Lecture, First International Ophthalmological Optics Symposium, Tokyo, May, 1978. Reproduced with the permission of the chairman.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Enoch, J.M. Vertebrate receptor optics and orientation. Doc Ophthalmol 48, 373–388 (1980). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00141466

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00141466

Keywords

Navigation