Abstract
Aim: To describe the outcomes and complication rates in 236 patients with idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus (INPH) after treatment.
Patients and Methods: Among a cohort of 257 patients with suspected INPH, 244 were shunted and 236 were followed up at 6 months after shunting (145 men [61.4%] and 91 women [38.6%] with a median age of 75 years). The study protocol of these patients included clinical, radiological, neuropsychological and functional assessment. The decision to shunt patients was based on continuous intracranial pressure monitoring and CSF dynamics studies. A differential low-pressure valve system, always combined with a gravity compensating device, was implanted in 99% of the patients.
Results: After shunting, 89.9% of the patients showed clinical improvement (gait improved in 79.3% of patients, sphincter control in 82.4%, and dementia in 63.7%). Two patients (0.8%) died. Early postsurgical complications were found in 13 of the 244 shunted patients (5.3%). Six months after shunting, the follow-up CT showed asymptomatic hygromas in 8 of the 236 (3.4%). Additional postsurgical complications were found in 7 patients (3%), consisting of 6 subdural hematomas (3 acute and 3 chronic) and 1 distal catheter infection.
Conclusions: Currently, a high percentage of patients with INPH can improve after shunting, with early and late complication rates of less than 12%.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Albeck MJ, Skak C, Nielsen PR et al (1998) Age dependency of resistance to cerebrospinal fluid outflow. J Neurosurg 89:275–278
Boon AJ, Tans JT, Delwel EJ et al (1997) Dutch normal-pressure hydrocephalus study: prediction of outcome after shunting by resistance to outflow of cerebrospinal fluid. J Neurosurg 87:687–693
Borgesen SE (1984) Conductance to outflow of CSF in normal pressure hydrocephalus. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 71:1–45
Eide PK, Sorteberg W (2010) Diagnostic intracranial pressure monitoring and surgical management in idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus: a 6-year review of 214 patients. Neurosurgery 66:80–91
Fillenbaum GG (1985) Screening the elderly. A brief instrumental activities of daily living measure. J Am Geriatr Soc 33:698–706
Hussey F, Schanzer B, Katzman R (1970) A simple constant-infusion manometric test for measurement of CSF absorption. II. Clinical studies. Neurology 20:665–680
Kahlon B, Sundbarg G, Rehncrona S (2002) Comparison between the lumbar infusion and CSF tap tests to predict outcome after shunt surgery in suspected normal pressure hydrocephalus. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 73:721–726
Katzman R, Hussey F (1970) A simple constant-infusion manometric test for measurement of CSF absortion. I. Rationale and method. Neurology 20:534–544
Klinge P, Marmarou A, Bergsneider M et al (2005) Outcome of shunting in idiopathic normal-pressure hydrocephalus and the value of outcome assessment in shunted patients. Neurosurgery 57:S40–S52
Linn MW, Linn BS (1982) The rapid disability rating scale-2. J Am Geriatr Soc 30:378–382
Lundberg N (1960) Continuous recording and control of ventricular fluid pressure in neurosurgical practice. Acta Psychiatr Scand 36:1–193
Marmarou A, Bergsneider M, Relkin N et al (2005) Development of guidelines for idiopathic normal-pressure hydrocephalus: introduction. Neurosurgery 57:S1–S3
Meier U, Bartels P (2001) The importance of the intrathecal infusion test in the diagnostic of normal-pressure hydrocephalus. Eur Neurol 46:178–186
Poca MA, Sahuquillo J, Busto M et al (1996) Clinical management of patients with normal pressure hydrocephalus syndrome. Ann Psychiatry 6:273–292
Poca MA, Sahuquillo J, Ibañez J et al (2001) Study of cerebrospinal fluid dynamics in the diagnosis of adult chronic hydrocephalus. In: Vázquez-Barquero A, Poca MA, Martín R (eds) Adult chronic hydrocephalus. Gráficas Calima S.A., Santander, pp 103–122
Poca MA, Mataro M, Matarin M et al (2004) Is the placement of shunts in patients with idiopathic normal-pressure hydrocephalus worth the risk? Results of a study based on continuous monitoring of intracranial pressure. J Neurosurg 100:855–866
Poca MA, Sahuquillo J, Barba MA et al (2004) Prospective study of methodological issues in intracranial pressure monitoring in patients with hydrocephalus. J Neurosurg 100:260–265
Poca MA, Mataro M, Matarin M et al (2005) Good outcome in patients with normal-pressure hydrocephalus and factors indicating poor prognosis. J Neurosurg 103:455–463
Sahuquillo J, Rubio E, Codina A et al (1991) Reappraisal of the intracranial pressure and cerebrospinal fluid dynamics in patients with the so-called normal pressure hydrocephalus syndrome. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 112:50–61
Solana E, Poca MA, Sahuquillo J et al (2010) Cognitive and motor improvement after retesting in normal-pressure hydrocephalus: a real change or merely a learning effect? J Neurosurg 112:399–409
Acknowledgments
The authors gratefully acknowledge Sabrina Voss for editorial assistance and the collaboration of the neurosurgical nurses in the study of these patients, especially Maria Jesús Peñarrubia (RN) and Maria Soledad Armengol (RN). This study was supported in part by Grant 07/0681 from the Fondo de Investigación Sanitaria (FIS) given to Dr. M.A. Poca.
Conflict of interest statement
We declare that we have no conflict of interest.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2012 Springer-Verlag/Wien
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Poca, M.A., Solana, E., Martínez-Ricarte, F.R., Romero, M., Gándara, D., Sahuquillo, J. (2012). Idiopathic Normal Pressure Hydrocephalus: Results of a Prospective Cohort of 236 Shunted Patients. In: Schuhmann, M., Czosnyka, M. (eds) Intracranial Pressure and Brain Monitoring XIV. Acta Neurochirurgica Supplementum, vol 114. Springer, Vienna. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-7091-0956-4_49
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-7091-0956-4_49
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Vienna
Print ISBN: 978-3-7091-0955-7
Online ISBN: 978-3-7091-0956-4
eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)