Skip to main content

Spatial Panel Data Models

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Handbook of Applied Spatial Analysis

Abstract

In recent years, the spatial econometrics literature has exhibited a growing interest in the specification and estimation of econometric relationships based on spatial panels. Spatial panels typically refer to data containing time series observations of a number of spatial units (zip codes, municipalities, regions, states, jurisdictions, countries, etc.). This interest can be explained by the fact that panel data offer researchers extended modeling possibilities as compared to the single equation cross-sectional setting, which was the primary focus of the spatial econometrics literature for a long time. Panel data are generally more informative, and they contain more variation and less collinearity among the variables. The use of panel data results in a greater availability of degrees of freedom, and hence increases efficiency in the estimation. Panel data also allow for the specification of more complicated behavioral hypotheses, including effects that cannot be addressed using pure cross-sectional data (see Hsiao 2005 for more details).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Allers MA, Elhorst JP (2005) Tax mimicking and yardstick competition among governments in the Netherlands. Int Tax Publ Fin 12(4):493–513

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anselin L (1988) Spatial econometrics: methods and models. Kluwer, Dordrecht

    Google Scholar 

  • Anselin L, Bera AK (1998) Spatial dependence in linear regression models with an introduction to spatial econometrics. In Ullah A, Giles DEA (eds) Handbook of applied economic statistics. Marcel Dekker, New York, pp. 237–289

    Google Scholar 

  • Anselin L, Hudak S (1992) Spatial econometrics in practice: a review of software options. Reg Sci Urban Econ 22(3):509–536

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anselin L, Le Gallo J, Jayet H (2006) Spatial panel econometrics. In Matyas L, Sevestre P. (eds) The econometrics of panel data, fundamentals and recent developments in theory and practice (3rd edition). Kluwer, Dordrecht, pp. 901–969

    Google Scholar 

  • Anselin L, Bera AK, Florax R, Yoon MJ (1996) Simple diagnostic tests for spatial dependence. Reg Sci Urban Econ 26(1):77–104

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baltagi BH (1989) Applications of a necessary and sufficient condition for OLS to be BLUE. Stat Prob Letters 8(5):457–461

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baltagi BH (2005) Econometric analysis of panel data (3rd edition). Wiley, New York, Chichester, Toronto and Brisbane

    Google Scholar 

  • Baltagi BH (2006) Random effects and spatial autocorrelation with equal weights. Econ Theory 22(5):973–984

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baltagi BH, Li D (2004) Prediction in the panel data model with spatial autocorrelation. In Anselin L, Florax RJGM, Rey SJ (eds) Advances in spatial econometrics: methodology, tools, and applications. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg and New York, pp. 283–295

    Google Scholar 

  • Baltagi BH, Song SH, Jung BC, Koh W (2007) Testing for serial correlation, spatial autocorrelation and random effects using panel data. J Econometrics 140(1):5–51

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beck N (2001) Time-series-cross-section data: what have we learned in the past few years? Ann Rev Pol Sci 4(1):271–293

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Breusch TS (1987) Maximum likelihood estimation of random effects models. J Econometrics 36(3):383–389

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brueckner JK (2003) Strategic interaction among local governments: an overview of empirical studies. Int Reg Sci Rev 26(2):175–188

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cressie NAC (1993) Statistics for spatial data (revised edition). Wiley, New York, Chichester, Toronto and Brisbane

    Google Scholar 

  • Elhorst JP (2001) Dynamic models in space and time. Geogr Anal 33(2):119–140

    Google Scholar 

  • Elhorst JP (2003) Specification and estimation of spatial panel data models. Int Reg Sci Rev 26(3):244–268

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elhorst JP (2005a) Unconditional maximum likelihood estimation of linear and log-linear dynamic models for spatial panels. Geogr Anal 37(1):62–83

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elhorst J.P. (2005b) Models for dynamic panels in space and time; an application to regional unemployment in the EU. Paper presented at the Spatial Econometrics Workshop, April 8–9, 2005, Kiel

    Google Scholar 

  • Elhorst JP (2008a) A spatiotemporal analysis of aggregate labour force behaviour by sex and age across the European Union. J Geogr Syst 10(2):167–190

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elhorst JP (2008b) Serial and spatial autocorrelation. Econ Letters 100(3):422–424

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elhorst JP, Freret S (2009) Evidence of political yardstick competition in France using a two-regime spatial Dublin model with fixed effects. J Reg Sci. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9787.2009.00613.x [forthcoming]

    Google Scholar 

  • Elhorst JP, Blien U, Wolf K (2007) New evidence on the wage curve: a spatial panel approach. Int Reg Sci Rev 30(2):173–191

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elhorst JP, Piras G, Arbia G (2006) Growth and convergence in a multi-regional model with space-time dynamics. Paper presented at the Spatial Econometric Workshop, May 25–27, 2006, Rome

    Google Scholar 

  • Ertur C, Koch W (2007) Growth, technological interdependence and spatial externalities: theory and evidence. J Appl Econ 22(6):1033–1062

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fingleton B (2008) A generalized method of moments estimator for a spatial panel data model with endogenous spatial lag and spatial moving average errors. Spat Econ Anal 3(1):27–44

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fingleton B, Le Gallo J (2007) Estimating spatial models with endogenous variables, a spatial lag en spatially dependent disturbances: finite sample properties. Paper presented at the First World Conference of the Spatial Econometrics Association, July 11–14, 2007, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Florax RJGM, Folmer H (1992) Specification and estimation of spatial linear regression models. Reg Sci Urban Econ 22(3):405–432

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Florax RJGM, Folmer H, Rey SJ (2003) Specification searches in spatial econometrics: the relevance of Hendry's methodology. Reg Sci Urban Econ 33(5):557–579

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • FranzeseJr RJ, Hays JC (2007) Spatial econometric models of cross-sectional interdependence in political science panel and time-series-cross-section data. Pol Anal 15(2):140–164

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goldberger AS (1962) Best linear unbiased prediction in the generalized linear regression model. J Am Stat Assoc 57:369–375

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greene WH (2008) Econometric analysis (6th edition). Pearson, Upper Saddle River [NJ]

    Google Scholar 

  • Griffith DA (1988) Advanced spatial statistics. Kluwer, Dordrecht

    Google Scholar 

  • Griffith DA, Lagona F (1998) On the quality of likelihood-based estimators in spatial auto-regressive models when the data dependence structure is mis-specified. J Stat Plann Inference 69(1):153–174

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hendry DF (2006) A comment on ‘Specification searches in spatial econometrics: The relevance of Hendry's methodology’. Reg Sci Urban Econ 36(2):309–312

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hsiao C (2003) Analysis of Panel Data (2nd edition). Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Hsiao C (2005) Why panel data? University of Southern California, IEPR Working Paper 05.33

    Google Scholar 

  • Hunneman A, Bijmolt T, Elhorst JP (2007) Store location evaluation based on geographical consumer information. Paper presented at the Marketing Science Conference, June 28–30, 2007, Singapore

    Google Scholar 

  • Jarque CM, Bera AK (1980) Efficient tests for normality, homoskedasticity and serial independence of regression residuals. Econ Letters 6(3):255–259

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kapoor M, Kelejian HH Prucha IR (2007) Panel data models with spatially correlated error components. J Econometrics 140(1):97–130

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kelejian HH, Prucha IR (1998) A generalized spatial two stage least squares procedure for estimating a spatial autoregressive model with autoregressive disturbances. J Real Est Fin Econ 17(1):99–121

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kelejian HH, Prucha IR, Yuzefovich Y (2006) Estimation problems in models with spatial weighting matrices which have blocks of equal elements. J Reg Sci 46(3):507–515

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kholodilin KA, Siliverstovs B, Kooths S (2008) A dynamic panel data approach to the forecasting of the GDP of German Länder. Spat Econ Anal 3(2):195–207

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Korniotis GM (2005) A dynamic panel estimator with both fixed and spatial effects. Paper presented at the Spatial Econometrics Workshop, April 8–9, 2005, Kiel

    Google Scholar 

  • Lahiri SN (2003) Central limit theorems for weighted sums of a spatial process under a class of stochastic and fixed designs. Sankhya 65(2): 356–388

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee LF (2003) Best spatial two-stage least squares estimators for a spatial autoregressive model with autoregressive disturbances. Econ Rev 22(4):307–335

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee LF (2004) Asymptotic distribution of quasi-maximum likelihood estimators for spatial autoregressive models. Econometrica 72(6):1899–1925

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leenders RTAJ (2002) Modeling social influence through network autocorrelation: Constructing the weight matrix. Soc Netw 24(1):21–47

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • LeSage JP (1999) Spatial econometrics. www.spatial-econometrics.com/html/sbook.pdf

  • LeSage JP, Pace RK (2007) A matrix exponential spatial specification. J Econometrics 140(1):190–214

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Magnus JR (1982) Multivariate error components analysis of linear and non-linear regression models by maximum likelihood. J Econometrics 19(2):239–285

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Magnus JR, Neudecker H (1988) Matrix differential calculus with applications in statistics and econometrics. Wiley, New York, Chichester, Toronto and Brisbane

    Google Scholar 

  • Manski CF (1993) Identification of endogenous social effects:the reflection problem. Rev Econ Stud 60:531–542

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mood AM, Graybill F, Boes DC (1974) Introduction to the theory of statistics (3rd edition). McGraw-Hill, Tokyo

    Google Scholar 

  • Nerlove M, Balestra P (1996) Formulation and estimation of econometric models for panel data. In Mátyás L, Sevestre P (eds) The econometrics of panel data (2nd edition). Kluwer, Dordrecht, pp. 3–22

    Google Scholar 

  • Ord JK (1975) Estimation methods for models of spatial interaction. J Am Stat Assoc 70:120–126

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pace RK, Barry R (1997) Quick computation of spatial autoregressive estimators. Geogr Anal 29(3):232–246

    Google Scholar 

  • Partridge MD (2005) Does income distribution affect U.S. state economic growth. J Reg Sci 45(2):363–394

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Su L, Yang Z (2007) QML Estimation of dynamic panel fata models with spatial errors. Paper presented at the First World Conference of the Spatial Econometrics Association, July 11–14, 2007, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Verbeek M (2000) A guide to modern econometrics. Wiley, New York, Chichester, Toronto and Brisbane

    Google Scholar 

  • Vrijburg H, Jacobs JPAM, Ligthart JE (2007) A spatial econometric approach to commodity tax competition. Paper presented at the NAKE Research Day, October 24, 2007, Utrecht

    Google Scholar 

  • Yang Z, Li C, Tse YK (2006) Functional form and spatial dependence in spatial panels. Econ Letters 91(1):138–145

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yu J, Jong R de, Lee L (2007) Quasi-maximum likelihood estimators for spatial dynamic panel data with fixed effects when both n and T are large. J Econometrics 146(1):118–134

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to J. Paul Elhorst .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2010 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Elhorst, J.P. (2010). Spatial Panel Data Models. In: Fischer, M., Getis, A. (eds) Handbook of Applied Spatial Analysis. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-03647-7_19

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-03647-7_19

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-03646-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-03647-7

  • eBook Packages: Business and EconomicsEconomics and Finance (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics