Skip to main content

The process of learning that neurogenesis actually exists has taken almost a century and has progressed slowly so far. In the late 1800s, scientists worldwide, including the prestigious Spanish researcher, Santiago Ramon y Cajal (1913), maintained that neurogenesis was a process restricted to brain development that ceased after birth. This conclusion was the result of studying the histology of the brain with the techniques of the time, such as Nissl and silver impregnation. Most researchers defined neurons as cells that were characterized by the presence of dendritic arborizations. When dendrites were not well developed, cells were thought to be in the process of differentiation, plastic changes, or the result of a histological artifact.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sara Gil-Perotín .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2009 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Gil-Perotín, S., García-Verdugo, J.M., Álvarez-Buylla, A. (2009). Historic Overview . In: Identification and Characterization of Neural Progenitor Cells in the Adult Mammalian Brain. Advances in Anatomy, Embryology and Cell Biology, vol 203. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-88719-5_1

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics