Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

A Microdata Child Well-Being Index: Conceptualization, Creation, and Findings

  • Published:
Child Indicators Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Over the past 30 years, a prominent stream of research has addressed the conceptualization and measurement of child well-being and the construction of child well-being indices. This paper extends this accumulating body of research in five ways. First, an index of child well-being for US children ages 6–11 is constructed using individual children (micro-data) as the unit of analysis rather than population-based measures which have typically been used in the past. Second, the new index uses a recently developed US data source (National Survey of Children’s Health) to incorporate far more measures related to child well-being (69) into an index than have been used in past efforts. Third, this research explicitly separates child outcome measures (measures of child well-being) from contextual measures (seen as measures of risk or inputs). Fourth, separate indices are developed for children age 6–11 and those aged 12–17. Fifth, analyses show that contextual indicators add significant albeit modest power over and above common demographic measures (age, gender, race/ethnicity) as predictors of individual differences in well-being among children.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. There were two small exceptions to this pattern, including a subquestion referring to children’s participation in “other” activities, and a question on school safety for 12–17–year–olds, only.

  2. Sharon Vandivere, William O’Hare, Astrid Atienza, Kerri Rivers. “States Ranked on the Basis of Child Well–Being For Children in Low–income Families”. A Paper Prepared for the Annie E. Casey Foundation. November 2007.

References

  • Benson, P. L. (1997). All kids are our kids: What communities must do to raise caring and responsible children and adolescents. San Francisco: Jossey‑Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bernstein, J., & Fungard, Y. (2005). Interpreting the FCD Index of Child Well-being. FCD Child Well-Being Index: Critical Appraisals 1. New York: Foundation for Child Development.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brim, O. G. (1975a). Macro-structural influences on child development and the need for childhood social indicators. Am J Orthopsychiatr, 45, 516–524.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brim, O.G. (1975b). Childhood social indicators: Monitoring the ecology of development. Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society 119.

  • Bronfenbrenner, U., & Morris, P. (1997). The ecology of developmental processes. In (Series Editor, W. Damon) R. Lerner (Ed) Handbook of Child Psychology, Fifth Edition: Theoretical Models of Human Development 1, (pp. 993–1028).

  • Brown, B., & Corbett, T. (2003). Social indicators and public policy in the age of devolution. In R. Weissberg, L. Weiss, O. Reyes, & H. Walberg (Eds.), Trends in the well-being of children and Youth. Washington, DC: Child Welfare League of America Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, B., & Moore, K. (2007). An Overview of State-Level Data on Child Well-Being Available through the Federal Statistical System. Washington, DC: Child Trends.

  • Byrd, R. S., & Weitzman, M. L. (1994). Predictors of early grade retention among children in the United States. Pediatrics, 93, 481–487.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eccles, J., Gootman, J. A. (Eds.). (2002) Community programs to promote youth development. Washington, DC: National Academy.

  • Federal Interagency Forum on Child and Family Statistics (1997). America’s children: key national indicators of well-being. Washington, DC: Federal Interagency Forum on Child and Family Statistics, US Government Printing Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hagerty, M., & Land, K. (2007). Constructing summary indices of quality of life: A model for the effect of heterogeneous importance weights.. Sociological Methods & Research, 35, 455–496.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keyes, C. L. (2003). Complete mental health: An agenda for the 21st Century. In J. Haidt (Ed.), Flourishing (pp. 293–312). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Land, K. C. (2006). The foundation for child development child and youth well-being index (CWI), 1975‑2004, with Projections for 2005 (Foundation for Child Development, New York). Retrieved May 18, 2006 from http://www.fcd-us.org.

  • Land, K., Lamb, V. L., & Mustillo, S. K. (2001). Child and youth well-being in the United States, 1975–1998: Some findings from a new index. Social Indicators Research, 56, 241–320.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lippman, L. (2007). Indicators and indices of child well-being: A brief American history. Social Indicators Research, 83, 39–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martin, J. A., Hamilton, B. E., Sutton, P. D., Ventura, S. J., Menacker, F., & Munson, M. L. (2005). Births: Final Data for 2003. Hyattsville, MD: National Center for Health Statistics.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moore, K. A. (1997). Criteria for indicators of child well-being. In R. Hauser, B. Brown, & W. Prosser (Eds.), Indicators of children’s well-being. New York: Russell Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moore, K. A., & Lippman, L. (Eds.). (2005). What do children need to flourish?: Conceptualizing and measuring indicators of positive development. New York: Springer.

  • Moore, K. A., Vandivere, S., Lippman, L., McPhee, C., & Bloch, M. (2007). An index of the condition of children: The ideal and a less-than-ideal U.S. example. Social Indicators Research published online May 25, 2007.

  • Moore, K. A., Vandivere, S., & Redd, Z. (2006). A sociodemographic risk index.. Social Indicators Research, 75, 45–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ogden, C. L., Flegal, K. M., Carroll, M. D., & Johnson, C. L. (2002). Prevalence and trends in overweight among U.S. children and adolescents, 1999–2000.. Journal of the American Medical Association, 288, 1728–1732.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Hare, W. P. (2006). The Kids Count initiative: Using demographic indicators to increase public awareness of child well-being. Paper delivered at the annual meeting of the Population Association of America, Los Angeles, CA, March.

  • O’Hare, W. P., & Bramstedt, N. L. (2003). Assessing the Kids Count Composite Index. A Kids Count Working Paper. Baltimore, MD: Annie E. Casey Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pollard, E. L., & Lee, P. D. (2003). Child well-being: A systematic review of the literature. Social Indicators Research, 61, 59–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sandefur, G. D., McLanahan, S., & Wojtkiewicz, R. A. (1992). The effects of parental marital status during adolescence on high school graduation. Social Forces, 71, 103–121.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seligman, M. E. P., & Csikszentmihalyi, M. (2000). Positive psychology: An introduction. American Psychology, 55, 5–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Theokas, C., & Lerner, R. M. (2006). Observed ecological assets in families, schools and neighborhoods: Conceptualization, measurement and relations with positive and negative developmental outcomes. Applied Developmental Science, Special Issue 10, 61–74.

    Google Scholar 

  • Watts, H. W., & Hernandez, D. J. (Eds.). (1982). Child and family indicators: A Report with recommendations. Washington, DC: Center for Coordination of Research on Social Indicators.

  • Youngblade, L., & Theokas, C. (Eds.). (2006). The multiple contexts of youth development: Implications for theory, research, and practice. Applied Developmental Science, Special Issue 10, 58–60.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zill, N., & Brim, O. G. (1975). Childhood Social Indicators. Newsletter. Society for Research in Child Development. Fall.

Download references

Acknowledgment

The support of the Annie E. Casey Foundation is appreciated.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kristin A. Moore.

Appendix

Appendix

Table 11 Content of the child well-being and contextual well-being indices and percentage of children (ages 6–17) classified as achieving well-being on the indicator, subdomain or domain composite

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Moore, K.A., Theokas, C., Lippman, L. et al. A Microdata Child Well-Being Index: Conceptualization, Creation, and Findings. Child Ind Res 1, 17–50 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12187-007-9000-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12187-007-9000-4

Keywords

Navigation