Abstract
An aging United States population, combined with traditional American values of independence and individualism, is fostering increased interest in community efforts to promote aging in place. This article describes the types of community aging-friendly initiatives that currently exist in the United States, and the roles that various sectors (e.g., public, non-profit, private) have played in their development. Findings from a national internet-based survey identified 292 current aging-friendly community initiatives, of four types: community planning, system coordination and program development, co-location of services, and consumer associations. Most represent local community interventions, developed in the absence of federal funding or guidance and often hampered by limited political authority or economic resources. Private sector solutions, such as mutual-benefit associations, appear to be on the rise; however, such initiatives are not widely accessible, especially to those individuals with insufficient resources or political power to participate in the private market. Taken together, these findings raise questions regarding the sustainability of current efforts, their availability to less-resourced individuals and communities, and the long-term ability of communities in the United States to make the infrastructure changes required to meet the needs of an aging society without an increased government role.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
AARP PPI (2008). The role of the older Americans Act in providing long-term care. Fact Sheet. Washington, DC: AARP PPI. Retrieved on May 27, 2009 from: http://assets.aarp.org/rgcenter/il/fs12r_oaa_ltc.pdf.
Abramson, L., Seligman, M., & Teasdale, J. (1978). Learned helplessness in humans: critique and reformulation. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 87, 49–74.
Atchley, R. (1989). A continuity theory of normal aging. Gerontologist, 29, 183–190.
Bloomberg, M., & Quinn, C. (2009). Age-friendly NYC. New York
Bolda, E., Saucier, P., Maddox, G., Wetle, T., & Lowe, J. I. (2006). Governance and management structures for community partnerships: experiences from the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation’s Community Partnerships for Older Adults Program. Gerontologist, 46, 391–397.
Carstensen, L., Fung, H., & Charles, S. (2003). Socioemotional selectivity theory and the regulation of emotion in the second half of life. Motivation and Emotion, 27, 103–123.
Clarke, P., & George, L. K. (2005). The role of the built environment in the disablement process. American Journal of Public Health, 95, 1933–9.
Eberhard, J. (2008). Older drivers’ “high per-mile crash involvement”: the implications for licensing authorities. Traffic Injury Prevention, 9, 284–290.
Feldman, P. H., Oberlink, M. R., Simantov, E., & Gursen, M. D. (2004). A tale of two older Americas: Community opportunities and challenges. Advantage Initiative 2003 National Survey of Adults Aged 65 and Older. New York: Center for Home Care Policy and Research, Visiting Nurse Service of New York.
Hartocollis, A. (2010). A fast-paced city tries to be a gentler place to grow old. New York Times, July 18, 2010. Retrieved from: http://www.nytimes.com/2010/07/19/nyregion/19aging.html.
Keenan, T. (2010). Home and community preferences of the 45+ population. Accessed January 31. 2011, from http://www.aarp.org/home-garden/livable-communities/info-11-2010/home-community-services-10.html.
Lawton, M. P., & Nahemow, L. (1973). Ecology and the aging process. In C. Eisdorfer & M. P. Lawton (Eds.), Psychology of adult development and aging (pp. 657–668). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
Lehning, A., Chun, Y., & Scharlach, A. (2007). Structural barriers to developing ‘aging-friendly’ communities. Public Policy & Aging Report, 17, 15–20.
Mezuk, B., & Rebok, G. W. (2008). Social integration and social support among older adults following driving cessation. Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, 63, S298–303.
National Association of Home Builders (NAHB). (2009). Planning for aging-in-place remodeling on the rise. Accessed January 31. 2011, from http://www.nahb.org/news_details.aspx?newsID=9008.
NORC Aging in Place Initiative. (2011). History of the Jewish Federations of North America’s Aging in Place Initiative. Accessed January 31. 2011, from http://www.norcs.org/page.aspx?id=160579.
NORC Blueprint. (2011). NORC Blueprint: A guide to community action. Accessed January 31. 2011, from http://www.norcblueprint.org/.
National Association of Area Agencies on Aging (N4A) and Partners for Livable Communities. (2007). A blueprint for action: Developing a livable community for all ages. Washington, D.C. Retrieved August 2009 from: http://www.n4a.org/files/programs/livable-communities/blueprint-for-action.pdf.
Rosenbloom, S. (2009). Meeting transportation needs in an aging-friendly community. Generations, 33(2), 33–43.
Rowe, J., & Kahn, R. (1999). Successful aging. New York: Dell.
Scharlach, A. E., Lehning, A. J., & Graham, C. L. (2010). Proliferation of the “Village” model: Neighborhood associations for aging in place. New Orleans: Paper presented at the Annual Scientific Meeting of the Gerontological Society of America.
Thomas, W. H., & Blanchard, J. M. (2009). Moving beyond place: aging in community. Generations, 33(2), 12–17.
Timiras, P. (2007). Physiological basis of aging and geriatrics (4th ed.). London: Informa Healthcare.
U.S. Census Bureau (2004). U.S. interim projections by age, sex, race, and Hispanic origin. Retrieved on July 9, 2007 from: http://www.census.gov/ipc/www/usinterimproj/natprojtab02a.pdf.
U.S. Census Bureau (2009). Facts for features: Older Americans month: 2009. Retrieved on June 1, 2009 from: http://www.census.gov/Press-Release/www/releases/archives/facts_for_features_special_editions/013384.html.
U.S. Department of Transportation: Federal Highway Administration. (2007). Accommodating bicycle and pedestrian travel: a recommended approach. US DOT policy statement integrating bicycling and walking into transportation infrastructure. Washington, DC. Retrieved July 2007 from: http://www.fhwa.dot.gov/environment/bikeped/design.htm.
Verbrugge, L. M., & Jette, A. M. (1994). The disablement process. Social Science & Medicine, 38, 1–14.
Wider Opportunities for Women. (2009, March). Factsheet: Elder Economic Security Initiative. Retrieved on December 30, 2009, from: http://www.wowonline.org/ourprograms/eesi/documents/NatlEESIFactSheet2008FINAL.pdf.
Zucker, A., Ostrove, J., & Stewart, A. (2002). College-educated women’s personality development in adulthood: perceptions and age differences. Psychology and Aging, 17, 236–44.
Acknowledgements
This study was conducted with generous support from the MetLife Foundation, the SCAN Foundation, and the Kleiner Family Foundation.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Scharlach, A. Creating Aging-Friendly Communities in the United States. Ageing Int 37, 25–38 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12126-011-9140-1
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12126-011-9140-1