Abstract
Bone cells sense mechanical load, which is essential for bone growth and remodeling. In a fracture, this mechanism is compromised. Electromagnetic stimulation has been widely used to assist in bone healing, but the underlying mechanisms are largely unknown. A recent hypothesis suggests that electromagnetic stimulation could influence tissue biomechanics; however, a detailed quantitative understanding of EM-induced biomechanical changes in the bone is unavailable. This paper used a muscle/bone model to study the biomechanics of the bone under EM exposure. Due to the dielectric properties of the muscle/bone interface, a time-varying magnetic field can generate both compressing and shear stresses on the bone surface, where many mechanical sensing cells are available for cellular mechanotransduction. I calculated these stresses and found that the shear stress is significantly greater than the compressing stress. Detailed parametric analysis suggests that both the compressing and shear stresses are dependent on the geometrical and electrical properties of the muscle and the bone. These stresses are also functions of the orientation of the coil and the frequency of the magnetic field. It is speculated that the EM field could apply biomechanical influence to fractured bone, through the fine-tuning of the controllable field parameters.
Similar content being viewed by others
Abbreviations
- B o :
-
Intensity of the time-varying magnetic field (Tesla)
- ω :
-
Angular frequency of the time-varying magnetic field radians.
- E A :
-
Intensity of the electric field induced by the time-varying magnetic field in the air (V/m)
- E M :
-
Intensity of the electric field induced by the time-varying magnetic field in the muscle (V/m)
- E B :
-
Intensity of the electric field induced by the time-varying magnetic field in the bone (V/m)
- ρ AM :
-
Surface charge density on the air/muscle interface (C/m2)
- ρ MB :
-
Surface charge density on the muscle/bone interface (C/m2)
- P rAM :
-
Normal stress on the air/muscle interface (N/m2)
- P rMB :
-
Normal stress on the muscle/bone interface (N/m2)
- P θAM :
-
Sheer stress on the air/muscle interface (N/m2)
- P θMB :
-
Sheer stress on the muscle/bone interface (N/m2)
- R M :
-
Radius of the arm (m)
- R B :
-
Radius of the bone (m)
References
Yasuda I (1953) Fundamental aspects of fracture treatment. J Kyoto Med Soc 4:395–406
Aaron RK, Ciombor DM, Simon BJ (2004) Treatment of nonunions with electric and electromagnetic fields. Clin Orthop Relat Res 419:21–29
Akhouayri O, Lafage-Proust MH, Rattner A, Laroche N, Caillot-Augusseau A, Alexandre C, Vico L (1999) Effects of static or dynamic mechanical stresses on osteoblast phenotype expression in three-dimensional contractile collagen gels. J Cell Biochem 76(2):217–230
Aslamazov LG, Varlamov AA (2001) The Wonder of Physics. World Scientific, Singapore
Bae C, Butler PJ (2008) Finite element analysis of microelectrotension of cell membranes. Biomech Model Mechanobiol 7(5):379–386. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10237-007-0093-y
Bashir S, Perez JM, Horvath JC, Pascual-Leone A (2013) Differentiation of motor cortical representation of hand muscles by navigated mapping of optimal TMS current directions in healthy subjects. J Clin Neurophysiol 30(4):390–395. https://doi.org/10.1097/WNP.0b013e31829dda6b
Bryant G, Wolfe J (1987) Electromechanical stresses produced in the plasma membranes of suspended cells by applied electric fields. J Membr Biol 96(2):129–139
Chakkalakal DA, Johnson MW, Harper RA, Katz JL (1980) Dielectric properties of fluid-saturated bone. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 27(2):95–100
Ciombor DM, Aaron RK (2005) The role of electrical stimulation in bone repair. Foot Ankle Clin 10(4):579–593, vii. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fcl.2005.06.006
Claes LE, Heigele CA (1999) Magnitudes of local stress and strain along bony surfaces predict the course and type of fracture healing. J Biomech 32(3):255–266
Cowin SC (2002) Mechanosensation and fluid transport in living bone. J Musculoskelet Neuronal Interact 2(3):256–260
Di Lazzaro V, Oliviero A, Pilato F, Saturno E, Dileone M, Mazzone P, Insola A, Tonali PA, Rothwell JC (2004) The physiological basis of transcranial motor cortex stimulation in conscious humans. Clin Neurophysiol 115(2):255–266
Di Palma F, Chamson A, Lafage-Proust MH, Jouffray P, Sabido O, Peyroche S, Vico L, Rattner A (2004) Physiological strains remodel extracellular matrix and cell-cell adhesion in osteoblastic cells cultured on alumina-coated titanium alloy. Biomaterials 25(13):2565–2575
Engelhardt H, Sackmann E (1988) On the measurement of shear elastic moduli and viscosities of erythrocyte plasma membranes by transient deformation in high frequency electric fields. Biophys J 54(3):495–508. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0006-3495(88)82982-5
Gehl J (2003) Electroporation: theory and methods, perspectives for drug delivery, gene therapy and research. Acta Physiol Scand 177(4):437–447
Goldenberg NM, Steinberg BE (2010) Surface charge: a key determinant of protein localization and function. Cancer Res 70(4):1277–1280. https://doi.org/10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-09-2905
Griffiths DJ (1999) Introduction to electrodynamics, 3rd edn. Prentice Hall, New Jersey
Grumet AE, Wyatt JL Jr, Rizzo JF 3rd (2000) Multi-electrode stimulation and recording in the isolated retina. J Neurosci Methods 101(1):31–42
Hannouche D, Petite H, Sedel L (2001) Current trends in the enhancement of fracture healing. J Bone Joint Surg 83(2):157–164
Hu WF, Lai MC, Seol Y, Young YN (2016) Vesicle electrohydrodynamic simulations by coupling immersed boundary and immersed interface method. J Comput Phys 317:66–81
Hyuga H, Kinosita K, Wakabayashi N (1991) Deformation of vesicles under the influence of strong electric-fields. Jpn J Appl Phys 1 30(5):1141–1148
Hyuga H, Kinosita K, Wakabayashi N (1991) Deformation of vesicles under the influence of strong rlectric-fields .2. Jpn J Appl Phys 1 30(6):1333–1335
Ingber D (1991) Integrins as mechanochemical transducers. Curr Opin Cell Biol 3(5):841–848
Janssen AM, Oostendorp TF, Stegeman DF (2015) The coil orientation dependency of the electric field induced by TMS for M1 and other brain areas. J Neuroeng Rehabil 12:47. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12984-015-0036-2
Kaspar D, Seidl W, Neidlinger-Wilke C, Ignatius A, Claes L (2000) Dynamic cell stretching increases human osteoblast proliferation and CICP synthesis but decreases osteocalcin synthesis and alkaline phosphatase activity. J Biomech 33(1):45–51
Kawata A, Mikuni-Takagaki Y (1998) Mechanotransduction in stretched osteocytes--temporal expression of immediate early and other genes. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 246(2):404–408. https://doi.org/10.1006/bbrc.1998.8632
Kotnik T, Miklavcic D (2000) Analytical description of transmembrane voltage induced by electric fields on spheroidal cells. Biophys J 79(2):670–679. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0006-3495(00)76325-9
Kotnik T, Miklavcic D (2000) Second-order model of membrane electric field induced by alternating external electric fields. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 47(8):1074–1081. https://doi.org/10.1109/10.855935
Kotnik T, Bobanovic F, Miklavcic D (1997) Sensitivity of Transmembrane voltage induced by applied electric fields—a theoretical analysis. Bioelectrochem Bioenerg 43(2):285–291
Kotnik T, Miklavcic D, Slivnik T (1998) Time course of transmembrane voltage induced by time-varying electric field - a method for theoretical analysis and its application. Bioelectrochem Bioenerg 45:3–16
Krasteva VT, Papazov SP, Daskalov IK (2003) Peripheral nerve magnetic stimulation: influence of tissue non-homogeneity. Biomed Eng Online 2:19. https://doi.org/10.1186/1475-925X-2-19
Laakso I, Hirata A, Ugawa Y (2014) Effects of coil orientation on the electric field induced by TMS over the hand motor area. Phys Med Biol 59(1):203–218. https://doi.org/10.1088/0031-9155/59/1/203
Lacroix D, Prendergast PJ (2002) A mechano-regulation model for tissue differentiation during fracture healing: analysis of gap size and loading. J Biomech 35(9):1163–1171
Lakes RS, JLK R (1977) Dielectric relaxation in cortical bone. J Appl Phys 48(2):808–811
Larsson S, Kim W, Caja VL, Egger EL, Inoue N, Chao EY (2001) Effect of early axial dynamization on tibial bone healing: a study in dogs. Clin Orthop Relat Res 388:240–251
Leblanc AD, Schneider VS, Evans HJ, Engelbretson DA, Krebs JM (1990) Bone mineral loss and recovery after 17 weeks of bed rest. J Bone Miner Res Off J Am Soc Bone Miner Res 5(8):843–850. https://doi.org/10.1002/jbmr.5650050807
LeBlanc A, Shackelford L, Schneider V (1998) Future human bone research in space. Bone 22(5 Suppl):113S–116S
Lee DC, Grill WM (2005) Polarization of a spherical cell in a nonuniform extracellular electric field. Ann Biomed Eng 33(5):603–615
Liedert A, Kaspar D, Augat P, Ignatius A, Claes L (2005) Mechanobiology of bone tissue and bone cells. In: Kamkin A, Kiseleva I (eds) Mechanosensitivity in cells and tissues. Academia, Moscow
Lipman KM, Dodelson R, Hays RM (1966) The surface charge of isolated toad bladder epithelial cells. Mobility, effect of pH and divalent ions. J Gen Physiol 49(3):501–516
Mansfield P, Harvey PR (1993) Limits to neural stimulation in echo-planar imaging. Magn Reson Med 29(6):746–758
McConnell LC, Vlahovska PM, Miksis MJ (2015) Vesicle dynamics in uniform electric fields: squaring and breathing. Soft Matter 11(24):4840–4846. https://doi.org/10.1039/c5sm00585j
Mills KR, Boniface SJ, Schubert M (1992) Magnetic brain stimulation with a double coil: the importance of coil orientation. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 85(1):17–21
Neidlinger-Wilke C, Wilke HJ, Claes L (1994) Cyclic stretching of human osteoblasts affects proliferation and metabolism: a new experimental method and its application. J Orthop Res 12(1):70–78. https://doi.org/10.1002/jor.1100120109
Nelson S (2015) Dielectric properties of Agricultural materials and their applications. Elsevier, London
Pawar SD, Murugavel P, Lal DM (2009) Effect of relative humidity and sea level pressure on electrical conductivity of air over Indian Ocean. J Geophys Res 114(D02205):1–8
Pilla AA (2002) Low-intensity electromagnetic and mechanical modulation of bone growth and repair: are they equivalent? J Orthop Sci 7(3):420–428. https://doi.org/10.1007/s007760200073
Polk C, Song JH (1990) Electric fields induced by low frequency magnetic fields in inhomogeneous biological structures that are surrounded by an electric insulator. Bioelectromagnetics 11(3):235–249
Riske KA, Dimova R (2006) Electric pulses induce cylindrical deformations on giant vesicles in salt solutions. Biophys J 91(5):1778–1786. https://doi.org/10.1529/biophysj.106.081620
Kamm R, Lammerding J, Mofrad M (2010) Cellular Nanomechanics. In: Bhushan B (ed) Springer handbook of nanotechnology. Springer, Verlag Berlin
Ruohonen J, Panizza M, Nilsson J, Ravazzani P, Grandori F, Tognola G (1996) Transverse-field activation mechanism in magnetic stimulation of peripheral nerves. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 101(2):167–174
Salvador R, Silva S, Basser PJ, Miranda PC (2011) Determining which mechanisms lead to activation in the motor cortex: a modeling study of transcranial magnetic stimulation using realistic stimulus waveforms and sulcal geometry. Clin Neurophysiol 122(4):748–758. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinph.2010.09.022
Schultz LGHHL (1936) The dielectric constant of air at radiofrequencies. Physics 7:133–136. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1745374
Semrov D, Miklavcic D (1998) Calculation of the electrical parameters in electrochemotherapy of solid tumours in mice. Comput Biol Med 28(4):439–448
Sniadecki NJ (2010) A tiny touch: activation of cell signaling pathways with magnetic nanoparticles. Endocrinology 151(2):451–457. https://doi.org/10.1210/en.2009-0932
Stratton J (1941) Electromagnetic theory. McGraw-Hill, New York
Toma CD, Ashkar S, Gray ML, Schaffer JL, Gerstenfeld LC (1997) Signal transduction of mechanical stimuli is dependent on microfilament integrity: identification of osteopontin as a mechanically induced gene in osteoblasts. J Bone Miner Res 12(10):1626–1636. https://doi.org/10.1359/jbmr.1997.12.10.1626
Veerapaneni S (2016) Integral equation methods for vesicle electrohydrodynamics in three dimensions. J Comput Phys 317:66–81
Ye H, Curcuru A (2015) Vesicle biomechanics in a time-varying magnetic field. BMC Biophys 8(1):2. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13628-014-0016-0
Ye H, Curcuru A (2016) Biomechanics of cell membrane under low-frequency time-varying magnetic field: a shell model. Med Biol Eng Comput 54(12):1871–1881. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11517-016-1478-9
Ye H, Steiger A (2015) Neuron matters: electric activation of neuronal tissue is dependent on the interaction between the neuron and the electric field. J Neuroeng Rehabil 12:65. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12984-015-0061-1
Ye H, Cotic M, Carlen PL (2007) Transmembrane potential induced in a spherical cell model under low-frequency magnetic stimulation. J Neural Eng 4(3):283–293. https://doi.org/10.1088/1741-2560/4/3/014
Ye H, Cotic M, Fehlings MG, Carlen PL (2011) Transmembrane potential generated by a magnetically induced transverse electric field in a cylindrical axonal model. Med Biol Eng Comput 49(1):107–119. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11517-010-0704-0
Yonemori K, Matsunaga S, Ishidou Y, Maeda S, Yoshida H (1996) Early effects of electrical stimulation on osteogenesis. Bone 19(2):173–180
You L, Cowin SC, Schaffler MB, Weinbaum S (2001) A model for strain amplification in the actin cytoskeleton of osteocytes due to fluid drag on pericellular matrix. J Biomech 34(11):1375–1386
Acknowledgements
Austin Curcuru helped with the validation of the equations and Stephanie Kaszuba assisted with editing of the manuscript.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Appendix - Determining unknown coefficients C n, D n in Eq. (3) using boundary conditions (A)-(D)
Appendix - Determining unknown coefficients C n, D n in Eq. (3) using boundary conditions (A)-(D)
Since V is bounded at r = 0 and r → ∞, from Eq. (3),
Therefore, expressions for the potential distribution in the extracellular media, the membrane, and in the cytoplasm are:
Substitution of A0r (Eq. 9) and the \( \overset{\rightharpoonup }{r} \) components of ∇V in the three regions into (1) yielded the expressions of the normal components of the electric fields in the three regions:
Following boundary condition (A), V is continuous at the air/limb interface (r = RM) and muscle/bone interface (r = RB),
From the boundary condition (B), that the normal components of the current densities are continuous between two different media (Eqs. 1 and 2), we can obtain the following equations:
Equations (A-7) through (A-10) yielded the last four unknown coefficients:
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Ye, H. Mechanic stress generated by a time-varying electromagnetic field on bone surface. Med Biol Eng Comput 56, 1793–1805 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11517-018-1814-3
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11517-018-1814-3