Skip to main content
Log in

Fast Track intervention effects on youth arrests and delinquency

  • Published:
Journal of Experimental Criminology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

An Erratum to this article was published on 01 September 2010

Abstract

This paper examines the effects of the Fast Track preventive intervention on youth arrests and self-reported delinquent behavior through age 19. High-risk youth randomly assigned to receive a long-term, comprehensive preventive intervention from 1st grade through 10th grade at four sites were compared to high-risk control youth. Findings indicated that random assignment to Fast Track reduced court-recorded juvenile arrest activity based on a severity weighted sum of juvenile arrests. Supplementary analyses revealed an intervention effect on the reduction in the number of court-recorded moderate-severity juvenile arrests, relative to control children. In addition, among youth with higher initial behavioral risk, the intervention reduced the number of high-severity adult arrests relative to the control youth. Survival analyses examining the onset of arrests and delinquent behavior revealed a similar pattern of findings. Intervention decreased the probability of any juvenile arrest among intervention youth not previously arrested. In addition, intervention decreased the probability of a self-reported high-severity offense among youth with no previous self-reported high-severity offense. Intervention effects were also evident on the onset of high-severity court-recorded adult arrests among participants, but these effects varied by site. The current findings suggest that comprehensive preventive intervention can prevent juvenile arrest rates, although the presence and nature of intervention effects differs by outcome.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. We estimated a revised imputation model for these auxiliary analyses that included the number of arrests and offenses in each severity category and grade rather than the severity indices at each grade.

References

  • Achenbach, T. M. (1991a). Manual for the child behavior checklist and 1991 profile. Burlington: University of Vermont Department of Psychiatry.

    Google Scholar 

  • Achenbach, T. M. (1991b). Manual for the Teacher’s Report Form and 1991 Profile. Burlington: University of Vermont Department of Psychiatry.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, J. A. (1984). Regression and ordered categorical variables. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B, 46, 1–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bierman, K. L., Greenberg, M. T., & the Conduct Problems Prevention Research Group. (1996). Social skills training in the Fast Track program. In R. DeV Peters & R. J. McMahon (Eds.), Preventing childhood disorders, substance abuse, and delinquency (pp. 65–89). Thousand Oaks: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boisjoli, R., Vitaro, F., Lacourse, E., Barker, E. D., & Tremblay, R. E. (2007). Impact and clinical significance of a preventive intervention for disruptive boys: 15-year follow-up. British Journal of Psychiatry, 191, 415–419.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brandt, D. E. (2006). Delinquency, development, and social policy. New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Butts, J. A., & Snyder, H. N. (2007). Where are juvenile crime trends headed? Juvenile and Family Justice Today, 16–20.

  • Cairns, R. B., Cairns, B. D., Neckerman, H. J., Gest, S. D., & Gariepy, J. L. (1988). Social networks and aggressive behavior: Peer support or peer rejection? Developmental Psychology, 24, 815–823.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cernkovich, S. A., & Giordano, P. C. (2001). Stability and change in antisocial behaviour: The transition from adolescence to early adulthood. Criminology, 39, 371–410.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Conduct Problems Prevention Research Group. (1992). A developmental and clinical model for the prevention of conduct disorder: The FAST Track program. Development and Psychopathology, 4, 509–527.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Conduct Problems Prevention Research Group. (1999). Initial impact of the Fast Track prevention trial for conduct problems: I. The high-risk sample. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 67, 631–647.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Conduct Problems Prevention Research Group. (2002a). Evaluation of the first three years of the Fast Track prevention trial with children at high risk for adolescent conduct problems. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 30, 19–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Conduct Problems Prevention Research Group. (2002b). The implementation of the Fast Track program: An example of a large-scale prevention science efficacy trial. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 30, 1–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Conduct Problems Prevention Research Group. (2004). The effects of the Fast Track program on serious problem outcomes at the end of elementary school. Journal of Clinical Child and Adolescent Psychology, 33, 650–661.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Conduct Problems Prevention Research Group. (2007). The Fast Track randomized controlled trial to prevent externalizing psychiatric disorders. Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 46, 319–333.

    Google Scholar 

  • Conduct Problems Prevention Research Group. (in press). The effects of the Fast Track program on disruptive behavior, deviant peer relations, and social skills during the middle school years. The Journal of Early Adolescence.

  • Dishion, T. J., Patterson, G. R., & Griesler, P. C. (1994). Peer adaptations in the development of antisocial behaviour: A confluence model. In L. R. Huesmann (Ed.), Aggressive behaviour: Current perspectives (pp. 61–95). New York: Plenum Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dodge, K. A. (1993). Home visiting manual for the Fast Track program. Nashville: Unpublished.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dodge, K. A., Dishion, T. J., & Lansford, J. E. (2006). Deviant peer influences in programs for youth: Problems and solutions. New York: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eddy, J. M., Reid, J. B., Stoolmiller, M., & Fetrow, R. A. (2003). Outcomes during middle school for an elementary school-based preventive intervention for conduct problems: Follow-up results from a randomized trial. Behavior Therapy, 34, 535–552.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elliott, D. S., Huizinga, D., & Ageton, S. S. (1985). Explaining delinquency and drug use. Beverly Hills: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elrod, P., & Ryder, R. S. (2005). Juvenile justice: A social, historical, and legal perspective (2nd ed.). Boston: Jones and Bartlett.

    Google Scholar 

  • Farrington, D., Loeber, R., Stouthamer-Loeber, M., Van Kammen, W. B., & Schmidt, L. (1996). Self-reported delinquency and a combined delinquency seriousness scale based on boys, mothers, and teachers: concurrent and predictive validity for African-Americans and Caucasians. Criminology, 34, 493–517.

  • Farrington, D. P., Jolliffe, D., Loeber, R., & Homish, D. L. (2007). How many offenses are really committed per juvenile court offender? Victims & Offenders, 2, 227–249.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Foster, E. M., Jones, D., & Conduct Problems Prevention Research Group. (2005). The high costs of aggression: Public expenditures resulting from conduct disorder. American Journal of Public Health, 95, 1767–1772.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Foster, E. M., Jones, D., & Conduct Problems Prevention Research Group. (2006). Can a costly intervention be cost-effective? An analysis of violence prevention. Archives of General Psychiatry, 63, 1284–1291.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hawkins, J. D., Kosterman, R., Catalano, R. F., Hill, K. G., & Abbott, R. D. (2005). Promoting positive adult functioning through social development intervention in childhood. Archives of Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine, 159, 25–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hill, L. G., Lochman, J. E., Coie, J. D., Greenberg, M. T., & Conduct Problems Prevention Research Group. (2004). Effectiveness of early screening for externalizing problems: Issues of screening accuracy and utility. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 72, 809–820.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hollingshead, A. A. (1975). Four-factor index of social status. Unpublished manuscript. Yale University: New Haven.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, D. E., Godwin, J., Dodge, K. A., Bierman, K. L., Coie, J. D., Greenberg, M.T. et al. (in press). The impact of the fast track prevention trial on health services utilization by youth at risk for conduct problems. Pediatrics.

  • Kirk, D. S. (2006). Examining the divergence across self-report and official data sources on inferences about the adolescent life-course of crime. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 22, 107–129.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kusche, C. A., & Greenberg, M. T. (1993). The PATHS (Promoting alternative thinking strategies) Curriculum. Deerfield: Channing-Bete Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lahey, B. B., Loeber, R., Burke, J. D., & Applegate, B. (2005). Predicting future antisocial personality disorder in males from a clinical assessment in childhood. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 73, 389–399.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lochman, J. E., & the Conduct Problems Prevention Research Group. (1995). Screening of child behavior problems for prevention programs at school entry. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 63, 549–559.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lochman, J. E., & Wells, K. C. (2003). Effectiveness study of Coping Power and classroom intervention with aggressive children: outcomes at a one-year follow up. Behavior Therapy, 34, 493–515.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lochman, J. E., & Wells, K. C. (2004). The coping power program for preadolescent aggressive boys and their parents: Outcome effects at the one-year follow-up. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 72, 571–578.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Long, J. S., & Freese, J. (2001). Regression models for categorical and limited dependent variables with Stata. College Station: Stata Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McKelvey, R. D., & Zavoina, W. (1975). A statistical model for the analysis of ordinal level dependent variables. Journal of Mathematical Sociology, 4, 103–120.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McMahon, R. J., Slough, N., & the Conduct Problems Prevention Research Group. (1996). Family-based intervention in the Fast Track Program. In R. DeV Peters & R. J. McMahon (Eds.), Preventing childhood disorders, substance use, and delinquency (pp. 90–110). Thousand Oaks: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olds, D., Henderson, C. R., Cole, R., Eckenrode, J., Kitzman, H., Luckey, D., et al. (1998). Long-term effects of nurse home visitation on children's criminal and antisocial behavior: 15-year follow-up of a randomized controlled trial. Journal of the American Medical Association, 280, 1238–1244.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oyserman, D. (2000). School-to-Jobs facilitators manual: After-school program. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pellegrini, A. D. (2003). Perceptions and functions of play and real fighting in early adolescence. Child Development, 74, 1522–1533.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reinherz, H. Z., Tanner, J. L., Berger, S. R., Beardslee, W. R., & Fitzmaurice, G. M. (2006). Adolescent suicidal ideation as predictive of psychopathology, suicidal behavior and compromised functioning at age 30. American Journal of Psychiatry, 163, 1226–1232.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schafer, J. L., & Graham, J. W. (2002). Missing data: Our view of the state of the art. Psychological Methods, 7, 147–177.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thornberry, T. P., & Krohn, M. D. (2001). The development of delinquency: An interactional perspective. In S. O. White (Ed.), Handbook of youth and justice (pp. 289–305). Dordrecht: Kluwer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vitaro, F., Brendgen, M., Pagani, L., Tremblay, R. E., & McDuff, P. (1999). Disruptive behavior, peer association, and conduct disorder: Testing the developmental links through early intervention. Development and Psychopathology, 11, 287–304.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Werthamer-Larsson, L., Kellam, S. G., & Wheeler, L. (1991). Effects of first grade classroom environment on shy behavior, aggressive behavior, and concentration problems. American Journal of Community Psychology, 19, 585–602.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • West, D. J., & Farrington, D. P. (1973). Who becomes delinquent? Second report of the Cambridge Study in delinquent development. Oxford: Crane.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Disclosure

Drs. Bierman, Coie, Dodge, Greenberg, Lochman, and McMahon are the developers of the Fast Track curriculum and have a publishing agreement with Oxford University Press. Dr. Greenberg is an author on the PATHS curriculum and has a royalty agreement with Channing-Bete, Inc. Dr. Greenberg is a principal in PATHS Training, LLC. Dr. McMahon is a coauthor of Helping the Noncompliant Child and has a royalty agreement with Guilford Publications, Inc.; he is also a member of the Treatments That Work Scientific Advisory Board with Oxford University Press. The other authors have no financial relationships to disclose.

Karen L. Bierman, Ph.D.

is a distinguished professor of child-clinical psychology and director of the Child Study Center at The Pennsylvania State University. Her research program focuses on social-emotional development and children at risk, with an emphasis on the design and evaluation of school- and community-based programs that promote social competence, school readiness, positive intergroup relations, and that reduce aggression and violence. Dr. Bierman served as the principal investigator for the Pennsylvania site of the Fast Track Program.

John D. Coie, Ph.D.

is Professor Emeritus in Psychology and Neuroscience at Duke University. He has studied the development of antisocial behavior and children’s relations with peers. He continues to be interested in prevention of antisocial behavior and disorder and the promotion of children’s competence in community settings.

Kenneth A. Dodge, Ph.D.

is the William McDougall Professor of Public Policy and Director of the Center for Child and Family Policy at Duke University. He studies the development and prevention of violence in children and families.

Mark T. Greenberg, Ph.D.

is the Bennett Chair of Prevention Research and Director of the Prevention Research Center at Pennsylvania State University. He studies developmental processes and interventions focused on improving the competence of children and families.

John E. Lochman, Ph.D., ABPP

is Professor and Doddridge Saxon Chairholder in Clinical Psychology at The University of Alabama, and he directs the Center for Prevention of Youth Behavior Problems. His research examines social and social-cognitive risk factors related to children’s aggressive behavior, examines intervention efficacy, and examines variables that affect the dissemination of interventions in real-world settings.

Robert J. McMahon, Ph.D.

is Professor and Director of the Child Clinical Psychology Program in the Department of Psychology at the University of Washington. His primary research and clinical interests concern the development, assessment, treatment, and prevention of conduct problems and other problem behavior in youth, especially in the context of the family. Dr. McMahon served as the principal investigator for the Seattle site of the Fast Track Program.

Ellen E. Pinderhughes, Ph.D.

is Associate Professor in the Eliot-Pearson Department of Child Development at Tufts University. Her research examines family socialization processes among children and youth at-risk for problems in their development.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Consortia

Additional information

Members of the Conduct Problems Prevention Research Group, in alphabetical order, include Karen L. Bierman, Department of Psychology, Pennsylvania State University; John D. Coie, Department of Psychology and Neuroscience, Duke University; Kenneth A. Dodge, Center for Child and Family Policy, Duke University; Mark T. Greenberg, Department of Human Development and Family Studies, Pennsylvania State University; John E. Lochman, Department of Psychology, The University of Alabama; Robert J. McMahon, Department of Psychology, University of Washington; and Ellen E. Pinderhughes, Department of Child Development, Tufts University.

This work was supported by National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH) grants R18 MH48043, R18 MH50951, R18 MH50952, and R18 MH50953. The Center for Substance Abuse Prevention and the National Institute on Drug Abuse also have provided support for Fast Track through a memorandum of agreement with the NIMH. This work was also supported in part by Department of Education grant S184U30002, NIMH grants K05MH00797 and K05MH01027, and NIDA grants DA16903, DA017589, and DA015226.

We are grateful for the close collaboration of the Durham Public Schools, the Metropolitan Nashville Public Schools, the Bellefonte Area Schools, the Tyrone Area Schools, the Mifflin County Schools, the Highline Public Schools, and the Seattle Public Schools. We greatly appreciate the hard work and dedication of the many staff members who implemented the project, collected the evaluation data, and assisted with data management and analyses. We particularly express appreciation to Jennifer Godwin for her work on data analyses for this paper.

An erratum to this article can be found at http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11292-010-9114-4

Appendix

Appendix

figure 1

Consort flow-chart

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Conduct Problems Prevention Research Group. Fast Track intervention effects on youth arrests and delinquency. J Exp Criminol 6, 131–157 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11292-010-9091-7

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11292-010-9091-7

Keywords

Navigation